Sindhu S vs Sri.Ishitha Roy Ias
2023 Latest Caselaw 10215 Ker

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                             PRESENT
            THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
   THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 30TH BHADRA, 1945
                   CON.CASE(C) NO. 1657 OF 2023
ARISING OUT OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 20.10.2022 IN I.A.1/2022 IN
             WP(C) 3718/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS:


    1     SINDHU.S,
          AGED 47 YEARS, W/O.JAYACHANDRAN K,
          DISTRICT MANAGER (ERNAKULAM)
          VEGETABLE AND FRUIT PROMOTION COUNCIL,
          KERALAM MYTHRI BHAVAN, NEAR DOORDARSAN KENDRAM,
          KAKKANAD, KOCHI, PIN - 682037

    2     ANIL KUMAR G.R,
          AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.G.RATHNAKARAN, DISTRICT MANAGER,
          VEGETABLE AND FRUIT PROMOTION COUNCIL, KERALAM
          MALAPPURAM - 676121

    3     RESHMI I,
          AGED 48 YEARS, W/O.M.JAYAPRASAD,
          DISTRICT MANAGER,
          VEGETABLE AND FRUIT PROMOTION COUNCIL, KERALAM
          PATHANAMTHITTA, NEAR SASTHA TEMPLE,
          PANDALAM, PIN - 689501

    4     MARY SIMON,
          AGED 56 YEARS, W/O.BINU EAPEN, DISTRICT MANAGER,
          VEGETABLE AND FRUIT PROMOTION COUNCIL, KERALAM
          KOLLAM, SWATHI, NEAR FACTORY JUNCTION, NADUVATHOOR,
          NEELESWARAM P.O., KOLLAM-., PIN - 691505

    5     SINDHU S
          AGED 49 YEARS, W/O.PRAKASH B, DISTRICT MANAGER,
          VEGETABLE AND FRUIT PROMOTION COUNCIL, KERALAM
          BUILDING NO.CPIX-382,SDM BUILDING, KARIMULACKAL,
          KOMALLOOR P.O, CHARUMOODU, KAYAMKULAM,
          ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 690505

    6     JAHANGIR KASIM,
          AGED 54 YEARS, DISTRICT MANAGER,
          VEGETABLE AND FRUIT PROMOTION COUNCIL, KERALAM
          J.M.COMPLEX, KODAKARA P.O., THRISSUR- - 680684
 C.O.(C)No.1657/2023         2



    7      SHYLA PILLAI,
           AGED 53 YEARS, MANAGER(P.T),
           VEGETABLE AND FRUIT PROMOTION COUNCIL, KERALAM
           MYTHRI BHAVAN, NEAR DOORDARSAN KENDRAM,
           KAKKANAD, KOCHI, PIN - 682016

    8      NISHA JOSE,
           AGED 48 YEARS, MANAGER(CREDIT)
           VEGETABLE AND FRUIT PROMOTION COUNCIL, KERALAM
           MYTHRI BHAVAN, NEAR DOORDARSAN KENDRAM,
           KAKKANAD, KOCHI-, PIN - 682016

    9      AMJA A.A
           AGED 52 YEARS, MANAGER TRAINING,
           MYTHRI BHAVAN, NEAR DOORDARSAN KENDRAM,
           KAKKANAD, KOCHI, PIN - 682016

    10     RAJESH U,
           AGED 51 YEARS, MANAGER,
           WAYANAD TRAINING CENTRE, VEGETABLE AND FRUIT
           PROMOTION COUNCIL, KERALAM
           KAMBALAKKAD, WAYANAD- - 673122

    11     HAREESH C,
           AGED 52 YEARS, MANAGER,
           VEGETABLE AND FRUIT PROMOTION COUNCIL, KERALAM
           TRAINING SEED PROCESSING PLANT, ALATHUR P.O,
           PALAKKAD - 678541

    12     MANJUSHA S
           AGED 49 YEARS, MANAGER(MARKETING)
           VEGETABLE AND FRUIT PROMOTION COUNCIL, KERALAM
           MYTHRI BHAVAN, NEAR DOORDARSAN KENDRAM,
           KAKKANAD, KOCHI, PIN - 682037

           BY ADVS.
           KALEESWARAM RAJ
           APARNA NARAYAN MENON
           CHINNU MARIA ANTONY

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 & 2:
    1   SRI.ISHITHA ROY IAS,
        AGE AND FATHER'S NAME ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE
        PETITIONERS, SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
        DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. SECRETARIAT,
        THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695001
 C.O.(C)No.1657/2023         3



    2      SRI.V.SIVARAMAKRISHNAN, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME
           ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS,
           CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           VEGETABLE AND FRUIT PROMOTION COUNCIL KERALA
           MYTHRI BHAVAN, NEAR DOORDARSHAN KENDRA,
           KAKKANAD, KOCHI, PIN - 682037

           BY ADV P.A.AZIZ, R2

           SRI.B.UNNIKRISHNA KAIMAL-SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER


        THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP
FOR ADMISSION ON 21.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 C.O.(C)No.1657/2023                  4




                              JUDGMENT

Dated this the 21st day of September, 2023

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

the respondents are refusing to comply with the interim

direction dated 20.10.2022. From the materials placed on

record and the affidavit filed by the second respondent, I

fail to see how the petitioners have been denied any

benefits on the basis of the non participation of the

petitioners in the test notified as Ext.P10. All contentions

are left open to be decided in the Writ Petition.

Accordingly, the Contempt of Court Case is closed.

Sd/-

ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE csl

APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 1657/2023 PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES

Annexure I TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 20.10.2022 IN IA 1/2022 IN WP(C) NO. 3718/2021.

Annexure II TRUE COPY OF THE LEGAL NOTICE DATED 04.04.2023 ALONG WITH THE POSTAL RECEIPT.

Annexure III TRUE COPY OF EXT.P10 IN THE WRIT PETITION, I.E. NOTIFICATION DATED 13.10.2022

RESPONDENT ANNEXURES

Annexure R2 (a) True copy of the Order Dated 6-10-

2021 in IA No. 1/2021 in W.P.

(c)No.3718/2021