Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2205 HP
Judgement Date : 17 March, 2021
CMP-T No.138 of 2021 in Execution Petition No.5 of 2021
.
17.3.2021 Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner.
Mr. Sudhir Bhatnagar and Mr. Arvind Sharma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Kunal Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents.
By way of instant application, prayer has been
made on behalf of the applicant/petitioner for revival of
Execution Petition No. 5 of 2021, which was disposed of by this
Court vide judgment 5.1.2021. Careful perusal of aforesaid
judgment reveals that this court having taken note of the
undertaking given by learned Senior Additional Advocate
General representing the non-applicants/ respondents that
judgment dated 7.1.2019 passed by erstwhile Himachal
Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in OA No.1416 of 2018 , if
not, already implemented, shall be implemented within a
period of six weeks, disposed of the aforesaid execution
petition with the direction to the non-applicants/respondents
to do the needful within a period of six weeks. Since, no steps
whatsoever have been taken by the non-applicants/respondents
toward execution/implementation of the judgment alleged to
have not been implemented, applicant/petitioner has
approached this Court in the instant proceedings, praying
therein for revival of the execution proceedings.
Mr. Sudhir Bhatnagar, learned Additional
.
Advocate General representing the non-applicants/respondents
prays for and is granted further three weeks' time to do the
needful in terms of judgment/order dated 7.1.2019, failing
which, respondents shall remain present in Court on the next
date of hearing.
r to
List on 24.4.2021
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge
March 17, 2021
(shankar)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!