Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Laljibhai Sahmjibhai Degama vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 2036 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2036 Guj
Judgement Date : 7 April, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Laljibhai Sahmjibhai Degama vs State Of Gujarat on 7 April, 2026

                                                                                                                 NEUTRAL CITATION




                             R/CR.MA/7914/2026                                      ORDER DATED: 07/04/2026

                                                                                                                  undefined




                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                             R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
                                         CHARGESHEET) NO. 7914 of 2026

                       ==========================================================
                                                     LALJIBHAI SAHMJIBHAI DEGAMA
                                                                 Versus
                                                           STATE OF GUJARAT
                       ==========================================================
                       Appearance:
                       MR N H PARMAR(11277) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                       MR. MH SHEKHAWAT(7194) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                       MR.JIRGA JHAVERI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                       ==========================================================

                          CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
                                DESAI

                                                           Date : 07/04/2026

                                                            ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate appearing on behalf of the

applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor

appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf

of the respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,

2023 for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in

connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11189010250012 of

2025 registered with Cyber Crime Police Station, Morbi,

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/7914/2026 ORDER DATED: 07/04/2026

undefined

for the offence punishable under Sections 111(2)(B),

316(5), 318(4), 61(2), 317(2) and 54 of the BNS.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit

that, considering the role attributed to the applicant, and

nature of the allegation levelled, the applicant may be

enlarged on regular bail. It is further submitted that,

since the charge-sheet is filed, further incarceration of

the applicant will not benefit the Investigation Officer in

any manner. It is further contended that, the applicant is

ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may

be imposed by this Court, if released on bail. Learned

advocate upon instructions submits that the applicant will

remain within the State of Gujarat during the trial.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public

Prosecutor appearing for the respondent - State has

vehemently objected to the grant of regular bail. Learned

APP has submitted that looking to the nature of offence

and the role attributed to the present applicant as coming

out from the charge-sheet, this Court may not exercise

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/7914/2026 ORDER DATED: 07/04/2026

undefined

discretion in favour of the applicant and the application

may be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf

of the respective parties and perused the papers.

Following aspects are considered:-

i. The applicant is a permanent resident of

District:Morbi, hence, would be available at the time of

trial.

ii. The applicant does not have any criminal

antecedent.

iii. The investigation is over and charge-sheet is filed.

iv. As per the prosecution case, the applicant provided

his bank account for depositing the Cyber fraud monies

and he had received Rs.2,54,560/- in his said account

out of which he had withdrawn Rs.2,50,000/- and had

given the said amount to accused no.4-Gopal Upsariya,

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/7914/2026 ORDER DATED: 07/04/2026

undefined

for which, he had received commission of Rs.25,000/-.

v. The apprehension of the learned APP about the

applicant, after being granted bail, would indulge in

such or similar offense, can be put to rest by imposing

stringent conditions.

This Court has taken into consideration the law laid

down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay

Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation reported

in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and

considering the nature of the allegations made against

the applicant in the First Information Report, without

discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court

is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the

discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The

applicant is ordered to be released on bail in connection

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/7914/2026 ORDER DATED: 07/04/2026

undefined

with FIR being C.R. No. 11189010250012 of 2025

registered with Cyber Crime Police Station, Morbi, on

executing a bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five

Thousand only) with one local surety of the like amount to

the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the

conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse

liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the

prosecution;

[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within

a week, and if he does not possess a passport, he shall

file an affidavit to that effect;

[d] not leave the State of Gujarat without prior

permission of the Sessions Court concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of his residence to the

I.O. and also to the Court at the time of execution of

the bond along with documentary proof and shall not

change his residence without prior intimation to the

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/7914/2026 ORDER DATED: 07/04/2026

undefined

I.O. and the court;

[f] not to leave Morbi District till the trial is over;

[g] mark presence on every Sunday before the

concerned police station till the trial is over.

[g] not indulge in similar kind of offence hereinafter,

for which, he shall file an affidavit before the

concerned court and the police station.

9. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he

is not required in connection with any other offence for

the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is

committed, the Court concerned will be at liberty to take

appropriate action in accordance with law.

10. Bail bond to be executed before the competent Court

having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the

concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the

above conditions in accordance with law.

11. At the stage of trial, the competent Court shall not

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/7914/2026 ORDER DATED: 07/04/2026

undefined

be influenced by any observations of this Court which are

of preliminary nature, made at this stage only for the

purpose of enlarging the applicant on regular bail.

12. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms.

Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct

service is permitted.

(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J) ANKIT SHAH

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter