Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
BARE ACTS

Category SideBar

Section 72. Liability of person to whom money is paid, or thing delivered, by mistake or under coercion-


Category of Bare Act Name of the Act Year of Promulgation
Civil Laws Indian Contract Act, 1872 1872
Act Number Enactment Date Chapter Number
9 1872-04-25 5
Chapter Title Ministry Department
Of certain relation resembling those created by contract Ministry of Law and Justice, Legislative Department Department of Law and Legislative Affairs

A person to whom money has been paid, or anything delivered, by mistake or under coercion, must repay or return it.

Illustrations

 (a) A and B jointly owe 100 rupees to C, A alone pays the amount to C, and B, not knowing this fact, pays 100 rupees over again to C. C is bound to repay the amount to B.

 (b) A railway company refuses to deliver up certain goods to the consignee except upon the payment of an illegal charge for carriage. The consignee pays the sum charged in order to obtain the goods. He is entitled to recover so much of the charge as was illegal and excessive.

COMMENTS

Ingredients of unjust enrichment

Under this Section the principle of unjust enrichment cannot be extended to give a right to the State to recover or realise vend fee after the concerned statute for realisation or recovery of vend fee has been struck down; M/s. Somaiya Organics (India) Ltd. V. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 2001 SC 1725.

Help us improve! Please suggest corrections.
 

Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 
 

Related judgement on Section 72. Liability of person to whom money is paid, or thing delivered, by mistake or under coercion-

M/S ULTRATECH CEMENT LTD. vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN, 2020 Latest Caselaw 424 SC Allahabad Bank Vs. Bengal Paper Mills Co. Ltd. & Ors [2004] Insc 624 (7 October 2004), 2004 Latest Caselaw 584 SC Indian Banks' Association, Bombay & Ors Vs. M/S Devkala Consultancy Service & Ors [2004] Insc 287 (16 April 2004), 2004 Latest Caselaw 283 SC Union of India & Ors Vs. West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. & Anr [2004] Insc 77 (5 February 2004), 2004 Latest Caselaw 76 SC Mahabir Kishore & Ors Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh [1989] INSC 215 (31 July 1989), 1989 Latest Caselaw 215 SC Salonah Tea Company Ltd Vs. Superintendent of Taxes Nowgong & Ors [1987] INSC 386 (18 December 1987), 1987 Latest Caselaw 385 SC Commissioner of Sales Tax, U.P. Vs. Auriaya Chamber of Commerce, Allahabad [1986] INSC 71 (10 April 1986), 1986 Latest Caselaw 71 SC State of Of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Vyankatlal & ANR [1985] INSC 72 (28 March 1985), 1985 Latest Caselaw 72 SC Shri Vallabh Glass Works Ltd. & Ors Vs. Union of India & Ors [1984] INSC 57 (14 March 1984), 1984 Latest Caselaw 57 SC Dhanyalakshmi Rice Mills Vs. The Commissioner of Civil Supplies & ANR [1976] INSC 29 (16 February 1976), 1976 Latest Caselaw 29 SC D. Cawasji & Co. Vs. The State of Mysore & ANR [1974] INSC 216 (29 October 1974), 1974 Latest Caselaw 214 SC Tilokchand Motichand & Ors Vs. H.B. Munshi & ANR [1968] INSC 289 (22 November 1968), 1968 Latest Caselaw 289 SC Jammu & Kashmir Bank Ltd. Vs. Attar-Ul-Nissa & Ors [1966] INSC 207 (7 October 1966), 1966 Latest Caselaw 208 SC Kamala Mills Ltd. Vs. State of Bombay [1965] INSC 120 (23 April 1965), 1965 Latest Caselaw 120 SC Bharat Kala Bhandar Ltd. Vs. Municipal Committee, Dhamangaon [1965] INSC 81 (26 March 1965), 1965 Latest Caselaw 81 SC State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Bhailal Bhai & Ors [1964] INSC 7 (20 January 1964), 1964 Latest Caselaw 7 SC Seth Badri Prasad & Ors Vs. Seth Nagarmal & Ors [1958] INSC 127 (9 December 1958), 1958 Latest Caselaw 127 SC Sales Tax Officer, Banaras & Ors Vs. Kanhaiya Lal Mukundlal Saraf [1958] INSC 81 (23 September 1958), 1958 Latest Caselaw 81 SC