Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
BARE ACTS

Supreme Court (SC) Judgements on Ccc

Bare Act Title Category / State
Ccc Karnataka State Laws
 

List of Judgements

South Delhi Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. SMS Ltd.

Judgement Date : may/2025, Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 576 SC

Sajid Khan Vs. L. Rahmathullah & Ors.

Judgement Date : february/2025, Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 174 SC

Vinubhai Mohanlal Dobaria Vs. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax

Judgement Date : february/2025, Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 114 SC

Mukul Kumar Tyagi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.

Judgement Date : november/2024, Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 684 SC

State of Telangana & Ors. Vs. Mohd. Abdul Qasim (D) per LRS.

Judgement Date : april/2024, Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 246 SC

M K Ranjitsinh & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors.

Judgement Date : march/2024, Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 205 SC

Union of India and Ors. Vs. Dilip Paul

Judgement Date : november/2023, Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 844 SC

The Revenue Divisional Officer Vs. Ismail Bhai

Judgement Date : november/2022, Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 914 SC

Zakia Ahsan Jafri Vs. State of Gujarat & Anr.

Judgement Date : june/2022, Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 496 SC

Union of India Vs. Dalbir Singh

Judgement Date : september/2021, Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 418 SC

P. Ishwari Bai Vs. Anjani Bai

Judgement Date : september/2021, Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 360 SC

Union of India Vs. S. Narasimhulu Naidu (D) through LRS.

Judgement Date : august/2021, Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 352 SC

In Re: Distribution of Essential Supplies and Services During Pandemic

Judgement Date : april/2021, Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 230 SC

Headnote :

The Constitution of India, 1950, Article 32, and the Disaster Management Act, 2005, Section 2(e) address the unprecedented humanitarian crisis caused by the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic. This includes the supply of oxygen and the Covidshield and Covaxin vaccines. The Central and State Govern...

PRANEETH K vs. UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION (UGC)

Judgement Date : august/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 479 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALExaminations - Guidelines from the University Grant Commission for conducting examinations by 30.9.2020 - A uniform date for the completion of examinations has been established nationwide to ensure consistency in the academic calendar - Neither the State nor the State\'s Disaster Management A...

PANDURANG GANPATI CHAUGULE vs. VISHWASRAO PATIL MURGUD SAHAKARI BANK LIMITED

Judgement Date : may/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 356 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALThe recovery process outlined in Section 13 of the SARFAESI Act applies to Cooperative Banks.The Reserve Bank of India exercises significant and comprehensive control over primary credit societies engaged in banking activities.Co-operative banks, whether established under State legislation or...

RAJENDRA K. BHUTTA vs. MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Judgement Date : february/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 195 SC

Headnote :

A. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 14(1)(d), along with Sections 76 and 79 of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976, pertains to a Tripartite Joint Development Agreement made between the Society, MHADA, and the Corporate Debtor for redevelopment purposes. A loan ag...

HANUMAN LAXMAN AROSKAR vs. UNION OF INDIA

Judgement Date : january/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 40 SC

Headnote :

The Environment Protection Rules of 1986, specifically Rule 5(3)(d), pertain to the granting of Environment Clearance and the lifting of its suspension. The Union of India has initiated proceedings requesting that the Minutes from the fortieth meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) be offic...

MUKUL KUMAR TYAGI vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Judgement Date : december/2019, Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1269 SC

Headnote :

A. The Uttar Pradesh Electricity Board of Operational Employees Category Service Regulations, 1995 - Recruitment - Qualifications - The advertisement for the Technical Technician Grade-II position specified that the required Computer Course qualification was the CCC certificate issued by NIELIT/DOEA...

DR. SYED AFZAL (D) vs. RUBINA SYED FAIZUDDIN

Judgement Date : november/2019, Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1058 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTInterim mandatory injunction - Cannot be issued without giving the other party a chance to respond.Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 39 - Preliminary decree of Partition - Issuance of Mandatory injunction and police assistance without providing a hearing opportunity - It is clear that whil...

M. SRIKANTH vs. STATE OF TELANGANA

Judgement Date : october/2019, Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1011 SC

Headnote :

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 482 Indian Penal Code, 1860 Sections 418, 420 and 120B Cheating - Quashing of proceedings - The complainant accused her brother of fabricating a Will and a gift deed, claiming he presented himself as the sole owner of the property. He executed a lease deed in fa...

PRABHAKAR GONES PRABHU NAVELKAR vs. S.S.PRABHU NAVELKAR(D) BY LRS

Judgement Date : august/2019, Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 759 SC

Headnote :

The Limitation Act of 1963, Article 65, and Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act of 1882.

State of Andhra Pradesh v. B. Ranga Reddy

Judgement Date : august/2019, Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 702 SC

Headnote :

Order 14, Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908.[Paragraph]

State of Andhra Pradesh v. B. Ranga Reddy

Judgement Date : august/2019, Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 696 SC

Headnote :

A. According to the Civil Procedure Code of 1908, specifically Order 41, Rules 22 and 33, in the context of appeals and cross-objections, defendants are not permitted to appeal against a decree that simply dismisses a suit. They can, however, challenge any findings against them through cross-objecti...

G. Shashikala (D) through LRS. Vs. G. Kalawati Bai (D) through LR.

Judgement Date : april/2019, Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 399 SC

M/s. Vijay Industries Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Judgement Date : march/2019, Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 211 SC

M/s. Vijay Industries Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Judgement Date : march/2019, Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 209 SC

Sanjay K. Dixit Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Judgement Date : february/2019, Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 164 SC

Ramesh Sanka Vs. Union of India

Judgement Date : january/2019, Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 59 SC

Pradeep Bisoi @ Ranjit Bisoi Vs. The State of Odisha [October 10, 2018]

Judgement Date : october/2018, Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 739 SC

Rajiv Vijayasarathy Ratnam Vs. Savitha Seetharam [September 11, 2018]

Judgement Date : september/2018, Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 634 SC

M. Durga Singh & Ors. Vs. Yadagiri & Ors. [April 18, 2018]

Judgement Date : april/2018, Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 290 SC

Rajive Raturi Vs. Union of India and Others [DECEMBER 15, 2017]

Judgement Date : december/2017, Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 917 SC

M/S Shanti Fragrances Vs. Union of India and Ors. [September 21, 2017]

Judgement Date : september/2017, Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 701 SC

Somasundaram @ Somu Vs. State Rep. by Dy. Comm. of Police [September 28, 2016]

Judgement Date : september/2016, Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 707 SC

Hari Shankers Vs State of Uttar Pradesh [April 28, 2015]

Judgement Date : april/2015, Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 335 SC

Madras Bar Association Vs. Union of India and another [September 25, 2014]

Judgement Date : september/2014, Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 621 SC

Mithilesh Vs. State of NCT, Delhi [MAY 28, 2014]

Judgement Date : may/2014, Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 381 SC

Majendran Langeswaran Vs. State (NCT of Delhi) & ANR. [July 1, 2013]

Judgement Date : july/2013, Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 426 SC

Sooguru Subrahmanyam Vs. State of A.P. [April 04, 2013]

Judgement Date : april/2013, Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 262 SC

State of Maharashtra Vs. Fazal Rehman Abdul [March 21, 2013]

Judgement Date : march/2013, Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 219 SC

State Bank of India and others Vs. Palak Modi and another [December 03, 2012]

Judgement Date : december/2012, Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 683 SC

Jai Prakash Singh Vs. The State of Bihar & ANR. Etc. [March 14, 2012]

Judgement Date : march/2012, Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 176 SC

Om Prakash Asati Vs. State of U.P. & Ors. [January 13, 2012]

Judgement Date : january/2012, Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 30 SC

B.N. Shivanna Vs Advanta India Limited & ANR

Judgement Date : march/2011, Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 207 SC

State of Uttaranchal Vs. Sandeep Kumar Singh & Ors. (7 October 2010)

Judgement Date : october/2010, Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 747 SC

Union of India Vs. Anil Chanana & Another [2008] INSC 99 (25 January 2008)

Judgement Date : january/2008, Citation : 2008 Latest Caselaw 99 SC

Hamza Haji VS. State of Kerala & Anr [2006] Insc 503 (18 August 2006)

Judgement Date : august/2006, Citation : 2006 Latest Caselaw 503 SC

D.S. Poonia Vs. Yumnam Dimbajit Singh & ANR [2003] INSC 115 (25 February 2003)

Judgement Date : february/2003, Citation : 2003 Latest Caselaw 114 SC

Patel Hiralal Joitaram [2001] INSC555 (18 October 2001)

Judgement Date : october/2001, Citation : 2001 Latest Caselaw 555 SC

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Jeet Singh [1999] INSC 69 (15 March 1999)

Judgement Date : march/1999, Citation : 1999 Latest Caselaw 69 SC

R. Pandian & ANR Vs. State of Tamil Nadu [1997] INSC 782 (21 October 1997)

Judgement Date : october/1997, Citation : 1997 Latest Caselaw 698 SC

Kiran Bala Vs. Surinder Kumar [1996] INSC 647 (2 May 1996)

Judgement Date : may/1996, Citation : 1996 Latest Caselaw 407 SC

Suraj Pal Vs. State of Haryana [1994] INSC 569 (9 November 1994)

Judgement Date : november/1994, Citation : 1994 Latest Caselaw 563 SC

Bharat Forge & Press Industries (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Baroda, Gujarat [1990] INSC 11 (16 January 1990)

Judgement Date : january/1990, Citation : 1990 Latest Caselaw 11 SC

Headnote :

Steel pipes and tubes of all kinds, including blanks, whether they are rolled, forged, spun, cast, drawn, annealed, welded, or extruded, were subject to duties under Item 26AA(iv) of the First Schedule of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.However, the Department aimed to classify \'pipe fitting...

Collector of Central Excise, Bombay-I & ANR Vs. Parle Exports (P) Ltd. [1988] INSC 352 (22 November 1988)

Judgement Date : november/1988, Citation : 1988 Latest Caselaw 348 SC

Headnote :

The respondent company was involved in producing nonalcoholic beverage bases classified under Tariff Item 68 of the Central Excise Tariff. The Revenue claimed that the company manufactured these beverage bases without a valid Central Excise Licence and had cleared the goods without paying the requir...

Collector of Customs, Bombay Vs. Swastic Woollen (P) Ltd. & Ors [1988] INSC216 (10 August 1988)

Judgement Date : august/1988, Citation : 1988 Latest Caselaw 215 SC

Headnote :

Respondent No. 1 imported consignments of wool material, asserting that the imported items were wool waste and therefore exempt from customs duty. An Expert Committee examined the goods and concluded that they were not wool waste. Following the Committee\'s findings, the Additional Collector of Cust...

Om Prakash & Ors Vs. R. K . Lakra [1988] INSC 183 (22 July 1988)

Judgement Date : july/1988, Citation : 1988 Latest Caselaw 182 SC

Headnote :

The land in question was allocated to an individual referred to as A by the Government of Kashmir, and according to the local customs, he was recognized as the Wasidar for that land.Upon his passing, his son inherited the leasehold rights. Following the son\'s death, his widow became the inheritor o...

Collector of Customs, Bombay Vs. Bhor Industries Ltd. [1988] INSC 112 (20 April 1988)

Judgement Date : april/1988, Citation : 1988 Latest Caselaw 112 SC

Headnote :

The respondents who imported \'Sancticizer 429\' challenged the duty imposed by the Department and submitted a refund claim, which was denied by the Assistant Collector on the basis that the product was identified as an organic compound (easter-type) in the form of a colorless viscous liquid and, ac...

Spaco Carburettors (India) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs, Bombay [1988] INSC 53 (24 February 1988)

Judgement Date : february/1988, Citation : 1988 Latest Caselaw 53 SC

Headnote :

The appellant firm imported a \"special purpose complex machine\" and asserted that it should be classified under item 84.45/48 of the tariff schedule, with a duty rate of 40 percent applicable.The Assistant Collector determined that the imported machine was not used for manufacturing carburettors b...

U.P. State Electricity Board, Lucknow Vs. P.L. Kelkar, [1987] INSC 159 (7 May 1987)

Judgement Date : may/1987, Citation : 1987 Latest Caselaw 158 SC

Headnote :

The first respondent in the appeal, a Superintending Engineer, was directly hired by the U.P. Electricity Board as an Assistant Engineer on October 7, 1964. He received nine advance increments due to his diverse experience in various governmental and other organizations, compared to only two advance...

Khandelwal Metal & Engineering Works & ANR Vs. Union of India & Ors [1985] INSC 141 (11 June 1985)

Judgement Date : june/1985, Citation : 1985 Latest Caselaw 141 SC

Headnote :

Section 2(15) of the Customs Act, 1962 defines \"duty\" as a customs duty that is chargeable under the Act. Chapter V of the Act outlines the rules regarding the imposition of customs duties and the exemptions available. According to section 12(1) of the Act, \"Unless otherwise specified in the Act...

State of Punjab & ANR Vs. Dina Nath [1983] INSC 180 (21 November 1983)

Judgement Date : november/1983, Citation : 1983 Latest Caselaw 180 SC

Headnote :

The respondent, a licensee for liquor vending, failed to pay the license fee despite multiple reminders. Consequently, recovery proceedings were initiated against him under the Punjab Land Revenue Act of 1857. The Collector issued a notice that prohibited the respondent from transferring or encumber...

Mohd. Shabir Vs. State of Maharashtra [1979] INSC 8 (17 January 1979)

Judgement Date : january/1979, Citation : 1979 Latest Caselaw 8 SC

Headnote :

The appellant was apprehended at the Bhuysawal railway station, where 17 containers containing 17,000 white tablets were seized from him. A public analyst tested the tablets and determined that they did not meet the standards outlined in section 18(a) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act. The appellant wa...

Union of India Vs. City Municipal Council, Bellary [1978] INSC 160 (8 September 1978)

Judgement Date : september/1978, Citation : 1978 Latest Caselaw 160 SC

Headnote :

On February 14, 1929, a notification was issued under section 135 of the Indian Railways Act, 1890, allowing the Bellary Municipal Council to impose and collect municipal taxes on railway property owned by the former Madras & Southern Mahratta Railway Company, which was a private entity. The Municip...

Jaila Singh & ANR Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors [1975] INSC 124 (2 May 1975)

Judgement Date : may/1975, Citation : 1975 Latest Caselaw 124 SC

Headnote :

The Rajasthan Colonisation (Bhakra Project Government Land Allotment and Sale) Rules, 1955, established under the Rajasthan Colonisation Act of 1954, came into force on December 25, 1955. These rules indicate that the distinction between tenants before and after 1947 is minimal. The Rajasthan Coloni...

Ram Lal & Ors Vs. Piare Lal Gobindram & Ors [1973] INSC 112 (3 May 1973)

Judgement Date : may/1973, Citation : 1973 Latest Caselaw 112 SC

Headnote :

The appellants, two brothers along with their sons, formed a partnership. They were declared insolvent, leading the Official Receiver to seize all their assets, including the disputed building. The appellants submitted an objection petition under Section 60 of the Code of Civil Procedure in conjunct...

Sohrab S/O Belinayata & ANR Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh [1972] INSC 132 (2 May 1972)

Judgement Date : may/1972, Citation : 1972 Latest Caselaw 132 SC

Headnote :

In an appeal challenging the acquittal, the High Court upheld the acquittal of certain defendants but overturned it for the appellants, convicting them of offenses under Section 302 in conjunction with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (I.P.C.).The appeal to this Court was dismissed.

Prabhakar Rao N. Mawle Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh [1965] INSC 98 (9 April 1965)

Judgement Date : april/1965, Citation : 1965 Latest Caselaw 98 SC

Headnote :

According to section 2(1) of the Madras Vexatious Litigation (Prevention) Act of 1949, the High Court of Madras had the authority to issue orders preventing any individual from initiating legal proceedings in any court (i) within the Presidency town without the High Court\'s permission, and (ii) els...