Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 
JATINDER KUMAR vs. STATE OF HARYANA

Judgement Date : 17 Dec 2019

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1278 SC

Headnote :

The Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 498A and 304B regarding dowry death - The appellant was charged with subjecting the deceased to cruelty related to dowry demands. The Trial Court and the High Court accepted the testimonies of prosecution witnesses regarding the torture and dowry demands made by...
HARINDER SINGH @ HIRA vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

Judgement Date : 17 Dec 2019

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1279 SC

Headnote :

The Indian Penal Code of 1860, specifically Sections 302 and 201, along with Sections 25 and 27 of the Evidence Act of 1872, pertain to the murder of a cousin brother. In this case, an extrajudicial confession was made, and the recovery of the deceased\'s body was conducted. The complainant, who is...
KOOLI SASEENDRAN vs. STATE OF KERALA HOME DEPARTMENT

Judgement Date : 17 Dec 2019

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1280 SC

Headnote :

The Indian Penal Code of 1860, specifically Sections 143, 147, 148, and 302 in conjunction with Section 149, along with the Explosive Substances Act of 1908, Sections 3 and 5, pertains to the murder of an RSS worker. This case involves an unlawful assembly of CPM workers who were armed with lethal w...
CENTRAL ORGANISATION FOR RAILWAY ELECTRIFICATION vs. M/S ECI SPIC SMO MCML (JV) A JOINT VENTURE COMPANY

Judgement Date : 17 Dec 2019

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1281 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTThe appointment of an Arbitrator must adhere to the General Conditions of Contract.A. Under Sections 11(6) and 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the appointment of an Arbitrator is discussed. The appellant awarded a contract to the respondent company, which failed to comp...
SAKETA VAKSANA LLP vs. KAUKUTLA SARALA

Judgement Date : 17 Dec 2019

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1282 SC

Headnote :

The Civil Procedure Code of 1908, specifically Order 39 Rules 1 and 2, pertains to an agreement to sell made between a developer and landowners. The document in question was not registered, yet physical possession was transferred to the developer. The developer requested that the landowners be order...
CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD vs. M/S. PARASVANATH DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.

Judgement Date : 17 Dec 2019

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1283 SC

Headnote :

The Consumer Protection Act of 1986, Section 23, addresses the directive to pay compensation in an appeal case. The National Commission ordered both the Developer and the CHB to compensate the complainant, a flat purchaser, with a principal sum and additional compensation in a 70:30 ratio due to del...
M/S GENENTECH INC. vs. DRUGS CONTROLLER GENERAL OF INDIA

Judgement Date : 17 Dec 2019

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1284 SC

Headnote :

Civil Procedure Code, Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Section 37 - Biosimilar drugs - Protection - The respondent\'s drug \'TrastuRel\' is claimed to be a biosimilar version of the appellant\'s \'Trastuzumab\'. The appellant\'s lawsuit in the High Court is neither a trademar...
M/S LANCO HILLS TECHNOLOGY PARK PVT LTD. vs. MANISHA BALKRISHNA KULKARNI

Judgement Date : 17 Dec 2019

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1285 SC

Headnote :

The Consumer Protection Act of 1986, Section 23, addresses the execution of a sale deed in cases of delayed possession of a flat. The order mandates compensation at a rate of Rs. 5 per square foot, along with an 18% per annum compensation for a six-month delay based on the agreed contractual terms....
P. SINGARAVELAN vs. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPPUR

Judgement Date : 18 Dec 2019

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1286 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTThe refusal to grant Special Leave Petition (SLP) through a non-speaking order does not equate to a declaration of law under Article 141 of the Constitution, nor does it invoke the doctrine of merger.A. According to the Tamil Nadu Revised Scales of Pay Rules, 1998, Schedule II, Serial No. 6...
JHARKHAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION vs. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA

Judgement Date : 18 Dec 2019

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1287 SC

Headnote :

The Jharkhand Eligibility Test determines candidates\' eligibility for lecturer positions in universities and colleges. According to Clause 4.1 of the scheme, a moderation committee was established solely to determine the cut-off marks for each subject when declaring results. The advertisement speci...
M/S SHANTI CONDUCTORS (P) LTD vs. ASSAM STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD

Judgement Date : 18 Dec 2019

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1288 SC

Headnote :

A. Under Article 137 of the Constitution of India, 1950, and Order 7, Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, along with Section 19 of the Limitation Act, 1963, a suit can be dismissed on the basis of limitation. The judgment determined that the limitation period for the petitioner\'s suit was gov...
RANA PRATAP SINGH vs. VITTIYA EVAM LEKHA ADHIKARI DIST. BASIC EDUCATION OFFICER

Judgement Date : 18 Dec 2019

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1289 SC

Headnote :

A. Under the Subordinate Offices Ministerial Staff (Direct Recruitment) Rules, 1985, specifically Rule 22, the appointment of the appellant as a Junior Accounts Clerk is valid. The position became vacant due to the promotion of the individual previously holding the role. The appointing authority cal...
STATE OF UP vs. RAVINDRA @ BABLOO

Judgement Date : 18 Dec 2019

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1290 SC

Headnote :

A. Indian Penal Code, 1860 Sections 302, 307, 149, 147, 148, and 452 - Acquittal - Appeal - Five individuals armed with weapons entered the residence of the deceased. When the deceased attempted to flee for safety, he was pursued and attacked. One of the assailants shot at the deceased, causing him...
M/S CEE CEE AND CEE CEES vs. K. DEVAMANI

Judgement Date : 18 Dec 2019

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1291 SC

Headnote :

The Puducherry Excise Act of 1970, specifically Section 2(22), along with the Puducherry Excise Rules of 1970, including Rules 22A (a), 163, and 209, addresses the relocation of liquor shops. The term \"place\" as defined in the Act encompasses various types of locations such as houses, buildings, s...
MAYANK N SHAH vs. STATE OF GUJARAT

Judgement Date : 18 Dec 2019

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1292 SC

Headnote :

A. Under the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 161 and 165, the fabrication of false invoices in the name of a firm led to the fraudulent and dishonest inducement of a bank to disburse Rs. 30,93,300/-. When the advocate who filed the appeal was promoted to the Bench, it became the responsibility of...
KHAJA BILAL AHMED vs. STATE OF TELANGANA

Judgement Date : 18 Dec 2019

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1293 SC

Headnote :

The Telangana Act for the Prevention of Dangerous Activities related to Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Land Grabbers, Spurious Seed Offenders, Insecticide Offenders, Fertilizer Offenders, Food Adulteration Offenders, Fake Document Offenders, Scheduled Commo...
M/S DYNA TECHNOLOGIES PVT.LTD. vs. M/S CROMPTON GREAVES LTD.

Judgement Date : 18 Dec 2019

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1294 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALArbitration Courts must exercise caution when differentiating between insufficient reasoning in an award and awards that are unintelligible.Generally, awards that are unintelligible should be annulled, unless the parties choose to forgo a reasoned award.A. According to Section 34 of the Arbit...
DAV PUBLIC SCHOOL vs. SENIOR MANAGER INDIAN BANK MIDNAPUR BRANCH

Judgement Date : 18 Dec 2019

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1295 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALOnline Banking Fraud - Misappropriation of Rs. 30,00,000/- from the school\'s bank accounts lacking net banking access - Order for Bank to compensate the School with Rs. 25,00,000/-.According to the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Section 2(1)(g), an Online Banking Fraud occurred when the schoo...
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK vs. HEAVY ENGINEERING CORPORATION LTD.

Judgement Date : 18 Dec 2019

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1296 SC

Headnote :

A bank guarantee is an independent agreement between the bank and the beneficiary. The bank is always required to fulfill its guarantee as long as it is unconditional and irrevocable. Any disputes between the beneficiary and the party that requested the bank guarantee are irrelevant and do not affec...
AKSHAY KUMAR SINGH vs. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Judgement Date : 18 Dec 2019

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1298 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTReview petition regarding the Death Penalty - A review petition is not intended for re-evaluating the appeal based on repeated assessments of evidence.A. Constitution of India, 1950 Article 137; Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 120B; Sections 120B IPC, 302, 307, 365, 366, 376 (2)(g), 377, 39...
IN RE ASSESSMENT OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN RESPONSE TO SEXUAL OFFENCES

Judgement Date : 18 Dec 2019

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1299 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTRegarding the agitation, anxiety, and unrest among the public due to delays in rape case proceedings, the Court has requested status reports from various responsible parties.Under the Indian Penal Code, 1860, specifically Sections 376, 166A, 357C, and 166B concerning rape cases, the Court h...
UTTARAKHAND TRANSPORT CORPORATION vs. HEERA SINGH PARIHAR

Judgement Date : 18 Dec 2019

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1300 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTDisciplinary proceedings are not of a quasi-criminal nature.Misconduct Incident - Disciplinary proceedings - An employee assaulted and mistreated a fellow driver - The High Court annulled the disciplinary proceedings, noting that they were treated as quasi-criminal in nature - The High Cour...
RAVINDRA PARSHI PARADKE vs. KALUSING

Judgement Date : 18 Dec 2019

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1301 SC

Headnote :

The Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act of 1961, Section 12(2)(c) addresses the issue of elections and reservations. The petition concerns the reservation proposed by the State Election Commission for upcoming elections, based on previous arrangements, with approximately 50% of the...
M/S DALMIA POWER LTD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Judgement Date : 18 Dec 2019

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1303 SC

Headnote :

The Income Tax Act of 1961, specifically Sections 139(5) and 170(1), addresses the amalgamation of the assessee company. It allows for the submission of a revised return even after the due date. It is the responsibility of the Department to evaluate the total income of the successor company for the...
VINAY EKNATH LAD vs. CHIU MAO CHEN

Judgement Date : 18 Dec 2019

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1304 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTIn eviction proceedings, the landlord may be required to demonstrate their title; however, this does not need to be proven with the same rigor as in a suit for a declaration of title.A. Under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and Section 45(1) of the Indian Partnership Act,...
STATE OF ODISHA vs. BICHITRANANDA DAS

Judgement Date : 18 Dec 2019

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1305 SC

Headnote :

The Government Grants Act of 1895, Section 3, and the Orissa Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act of 1972, Section 4(1) pertain to leases and the conversion to freehold status. In this case, a lease of land was granted to a lessee with the stipulation that no encroachments would...
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter