Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 
Maharao Sahib Sri Bhim Singhji Etc Vs. Union of India & Ors [1985] INSC 142 (1 July 1985)

Judgement Date : 01 Jul 1985

Citation : 1985 Latest Caselaw 142 SC

Headnote :

The Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (Act XXXIII of 1976) is currently applicable in 17 States and all Union Territories across the nation. Its aim is to establish a ceiling on vacant lands within urban areas that have a population of 200,000 or more. To achieve this, the Act categorize...
D.K Mitra Ors Vs. Union of India & Ors [1985] INSC 143 (1 July 1985)

Judgement Date : 01 Jul 1985

Citation : 1985 Latest Caselaw 143 SC

Headnote :

The Indian Railways Medical Service is composed of various positions including Assistant Divisional Medical Officers Class I (previously known as Assistant Medical Officers Class II before January 1, 1973), Divisional Medical Officers, Medical Superintendents, Chief Medical Officers, and the Directo...
Handibandhu Rautharao & Ors Vs. State of Orissa & Ors [1985] INSC 144 (1 July 1985)

Judgement Date : 01 Jul 1985

Citation : 1985 Latest Caselaw 144 SC

Headnote :

Until the academic year 1978-79, the Post Graduate Medical course in Orissa was designed to last three years, which included a one-year appointment on the Resident House Staff.Admission to this three-year program was based on an Entrance Examination, and after completing the Resident House Staff app...
Distributors (Baroda) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India And Two Ors [1985] INSC 145 (1 July 1985)

Judgement Date : 01 Jul 1985

Citation : 1985 Latest Caselaw 145 SC

Headnote :

The first provision that exempted inter-corporate dividends from super tax was established on December 9, 1933, through a Notification from the Governor General in Council, which stated: \"The Governor General in Council is pleased to exempt from super tax:779 (i) The portion of income from any inve...
Bombay Hawkers' Union & Ors Vs. Bombay Municipal Corporation & Ors [1985] INSC 146 (3 July 1985)

Judgement Date : 03 Jul 1985

Citation : 1985 Latest Caselaw 146 SC

Headnote :

In the city of Bombay, there are approximately 150,000 hawkers, with one-sixth of them being women. Generally, hawkers can be categorized into three groups: those with four-wheeled carts, those who sit on the streets (around 120,000), and those who operate from stalls to sell their products. They of...
Commissioner of Income Tax, A.P. Vs. M/S. T.Veerabhadra Rao, K. Koteswara Rao & Co. [1985] INSC 147 (8 July 1985)

Judgement Date : 08 Jul 1985

Citation : 1985 Latest Caselaw 147 SC

Headnote :

The assessee, a partnership firm, acquired the ongoing business of a previous firm along with all its assets and liabilities, which included a debt of Rs. 23,577. The assessee reported income tax on the interest earned from this debt for the assessment year 1963-64. On March 31, 1965, the assessee a...
Union Territory of Chandigarh Vs. M/S. Amrit Roller Flour Mills [1985] INSC 148 (8 July 1985)

Judgement Date : 08 Jul 1985

Citation : 1985 Latest Caselaw 148 SC

Headnote :

The respondent firm operated as a Roller Flour Mill and was licensed under the Wheat Roller Flour Mills (Licensing and Control) Order of 1957. According to Clause 3 of this Order, no owner or individual in charge of a roller mill is permitted to manufacture or have manufactured any wheat product unl...
M/S. Dhanpat Oil & General Mills Vs. Union of India & Ors [1985] INSC 149 (8 July 1985)

Judgement Date : 08 Jul 1985

Citation : 1985 Latest Caselaw 149 SC

Headnote :

The Produce Cess Act, 1966 is a dual legislation that establishes the imposition and collection of a cess on customs duty for produce listed in the first schedule of the Act when exported outside India, as well as an excise duty on the produce outlined in the second schedule.According to Section 8 o...
Dr. Dinesh Kumar & Ors Vs. Motilal Nehru Medical College [1985] INSC 150 (8 July 1985)

Judgement Date : 08 Jul 1985

Citation : 1985 Latest Caselaw 150 SC

Headnote :

The Civil Miscellaneous Petitions highlighted that neither the Government of India nor the Medical Council of India was able to conduct an All India Entrance Examination to fill 30% of the open category seats in the first year M.B.B.S. Course and 50% of the open seats in the Post-Graduate Course unt...
Maharaja Kumar Somendra Chand Nandy Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [1985] INSC 152 (10 July 1985)

Judgement Date : 10 Jul 1985

Citation : 1985 Latest Caselaw 152 SC

Headnote :

A Jagir consisting of 41 villages was granted to Dewan Krishna Kant Nandy, the predecessor of the appellant, by the Raja of Banaras. On January 10, 1785, a new Sanad was issued by the Governor-General, designating these villages as \'Altamga Jagir\' to cover the expenses related to the worship of a...
Sakuru Vs. Tanaji [1985] INSC 153 (10 July 1985)

Judgement Date : 10 Jul 1985

Citation : 1985 Latest Caselaw 153 SC

Headnote :

The Revenue Divisional Officer determined that the Respondent was the owner of approximately 6 acres of land under Section 38e of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950, on the basis that he was a \'Protected Tenant\'. Although the Appellant-Land-Holder had the...
K. Chandruetc. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors [1985] INSC 154 (10 July 1985)

Judgement Date : 10 Jul 1985

Citation : 1985 Latest Caselaw 154 SC

Headnote :

The Tamil Nadu government enacted the Tamil Nadu Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1971, to eliminate slums that pose a risk to public health or sanitation. In line with this Act, approximately 450 huts along Canal Bank Road near Loyola College were demolished on November 17, 1981. The nex...
Olga Tellis & Ors Vs. Bombay Municipal Corporation & Ors [1985] INSC 155 (10 July 1985)

Judgement Date : 10 Jul 1985

Citation : 1985 Latest Caselaw 155 SC

Headnote :

The petitioners in writ petitions Nos. 4610-12/81 reside on pavements and in slums throughout the city of Bombay. Some petitioners from the second set of writ petitions Nos. 5068-79 of 1981 are inhabitants of Kamraj Nagar, a settlement that reportedly emerged around 1960-61 near the Western Express...
A.Sreenivasa Pai & ANR Vs. Saraswathi Ammal Allas G. Kamala Bai [1985] INSC 157 (12 July 1985)

Judgement Date : 12 Jul 1985

Citation : 1985 Latest Caselaw 157 SC

Headnote :

The first appellant, A Sreenivasa Pai, executed a Settlement Deed in Malayalam on December 12, 1932, transferring two plots of land along with some buildings and outbuildings in Quilon to his mother-in-law, Padmavathi Ammal. The first appellant\'s father-in-law passed away in 1932, and his brother-i...
Ministry of Labour & Rehabilitation & ANR Vs. Tiffin's Barytes Asbestos & Paints Ltd. & ANR [1985] INSC 158 (16 July 1985)

Judgement Date : 16 Jul 1985

Citation : 1985 Latest Caselaw 158 SC

Headnote :

After reviewing the recommendations of the Committee established under sections 5(1)(a) and 9 of the Minimum Wages Act of 1948, the Government of India issued a Notification under the Act that set the minimum wage rates for specific categories of workers in certain mines. The mine owners contested t...
Jyasing Dnyanu Mhoprekar & ANR Vs. Krishna Babaji Patil & ANR [1985] INSC 159 (17 July 1985)

Judgement Date : 17 Jul 1985

Citation : 1985 Latest Caselaw 159 SC

Headnote :

Krishna Babaji Patil, the first respondent, along with his brother Bandu Babaji Patil, owned a half-share in the lands identified by survey numbers 221/1, 222/2, 226/8, and 226/12, totaling 22 acres and 13 gunthas, located in Monja Shirsi, Peta Shirola, District Sangli, Maharashtra. They were perman...
Narayan Singh & Ors Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh [1985] INSC 160 (19 July 1985)

Judgement Date : 19 Jul 1985

Citation : 1985 Latest Caselaw 160 SC

Headnote :

There was an ongoing land dispute between the deceased and the appellants. While the deceased was on his way to his village with PW 11, the appellants attacked him with swords and farsis, leading to his death from the injuries sustained. A First Information Report was filed without delay. The Sessio...
Mrs. Geetinder Kaur Vs. State of Punjab & Ors [1985] INSC 161 (23 July 1985)

Judgement Date : 23 Jul 1985

Citation : 1985 Latest Caselaw 161 SC

Headnote :

In her petition filed under Article 32, the wife of the detainee argued that his preventive detention in Bharatpur, Rajasthan, could be situated in Punjab or nearby. She requested that he be granted suitable amenities and facilities, not be subjected to solitary confinement, and be permitted to meet...
M/S. Krishna Bus Service Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors [1985] INSC 162 (25 July 1985)

Judgement Date : 25 Jul 1985

Citation : 1985 Latest Caselaw 162 SC

Headnote :

According to section 133-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, the State Government has the authority to establish a motor vehicles department to implement the Act\'s provisions and appoint officers as deemed appropriate. Prior to March 16, 1973, Rule 10:2 of the Punjab Motor Vehicles Rules, 1940 (appl...
P.A. Thillai Chidambara Nadar Vs. The Addl. Asstt. Commissioner. Madurai & ANR [1985] INSC 163 (29 July 1985)

Judgement Date : 29 Jul 1985

Citation : 1985 Latest Caselaw 163 SC

Headnote :

According to G.P. No. 1764 dated April 5, 1960, which was amended on December 22, 1960, under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, the Government exempted \"all sales of vegetables (excluding dried and dehydrated vegetables), fresh fruits, betel and plantain leaves, flowers, eggs, meat, and f...
State of Orissa Vs. Sridhar Kumar Malik & Ors [1985] INSC 164 (31 July 1985)

Judgement Date : 31 Jul 1985

Citation : 1985 Latest Caselaw 164 SC

Headnote :

Chapter XXX-A of the Orissa Municipal Act, 1950 grants the State Government the authority to apply the Act\'s provisions to areas outside of towns, referred to as \"notified areas.\" According to section 417-A in that Chapter, prior to extending the Act\'s application to a municipality, the Governm...
Ramesh Balkrishna Kulkarni Vs. State of Maharashtra [1985] INSC 165 (31 July 1985)

Judgement Date : 31 Jul 1985

Citation : 1985 Latest Caselaw 165 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, who served as a Municipal Councillor, faced prosecution under Section 161 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 5(1)(d) in conjunction with Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The trial court found him guilty of these charges. Upon appeal, the High Court upheld both his c...
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter