2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950

January February March April May June July August September October November December

The State of West Bengal Vs. Anwar All Sarkarhabib Mohamed, The State of Hyderabad [1952] INSC 1 (11 January 1952)

Judgement Date : 11 Jan 1952

Citation : 1952 Latest Caselaw 1 SC

Constitution of India
Delhi Laws Act, 1912
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)

Chintaman Rao Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh [1950] INSC 29 (8 November 1950)

Headnote :

The West Bengal Special Courts Act, 1950 (Act X of 1950), was introduced with the stated purpose of ensuring the speedier trial of certain offences, as reflected in the preamble and title of the Act. Section 3 empowered the State Government to establish Special Courts via official notification, whil...

Read full Judgement

N.P. Ponnuswami Vs. Returning Officer, Namakkal Constituency & Ors [1952] INSC 2 (21 January 1952)

Judgement Date : 21 Jan 1952

Citation : 1952 Latest Caselaw 2 SC

Constitution of India
Government of India Act, 1935
Representation of the People Act, 1951

Headnote :

Article 329(b) of the Constitution of India states that \"no election to either House of Parliament or to the House or either House of the Legislature of a State shall be called into question except by an election petition presented to such authority and in such manner as may be provided for, by or...

Read full Judgement

Hanumant Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh Raojibhai the State of Madhya Pradesh [1952] INSC 3 (23 January 1952)

Judgement Date : 23 Feb 1952

Citation : 1952 Latest Caselaw 3 SC

Constitution of India

Headnote :

When dealing with circumstantial evidence, there is always a risk that conjecture or suspicion might replace proper legal proof. Therefore, in cases based on circumstantial evidence, it is crucial to ensure that the circumstances leading to a conclusion of guilt are first fully established. These fa...

Read full Judgement

Naranjan Sigh Nathawan Vs. The State of Punjab [1952] INSC 4 (25 January 1952)

Judgement Date : 25 Jan 1952

Citation : 1952 Latest Caselaw 4 SC

Headnote :

In the absence of bad faith, a detaining authority may revoke an earlier detention order that has been challenged on merely formal grounds and issue a new order that is free from defects and fully complies with the legal requirements. Any allegation of bad faith, if raised, must be evaluated based o...

Read full Judgement

Shrimant Sardar Bhujangaraodaulatrao Ghorpade Vs. Shrimant Malojirao Daulatraoghorpade & Ors [1952] INSC 5 (30 January 1952)

Judgement Date : 30 Jan 1952

Citation : 1952 Latest Caselaw 5 SC

Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act, 1876

Headnote :

The Gajendragad estate, recognized as a saranjam by the British Government and declared partible by the Bombay High Court in 1868, was reassessed in 1891. The Government issued a resolution affirming that the entire estate was a hereditary saranjam, transferable to all legitimate male descendants of...

Read full Judgement