Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3506 Tel
Judgement Date : 1 November, 2023
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO
and
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N. RAO NALLA
C.C.C.A. No. 321 of 2003
Between:
Jagannath Pershad Verma Sunhera
and another .... Appellants
Vs.
Nayantara .... Respondent
JUDGMENT: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice B.Prakash Rao) It appears that this matter underwent several adjournments at
the request of the learned counsel appearing on either side. On
07.10.2010, when this matter was called both in the morning and in the
afternoon sessions, none appeared for the appellants, hence, the matter was directed to be listed after Dasara Vacation, 2010 under the
caption "for Dismissal". Even today, when the matter was taken up for
hearing, the learned counsel for the appellants sought further adjournment.
Having regard to the fact that the matter has already undergone
number of adjournments, we are not inclined to grant any further adjournments.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order
as to costs.
__________________ B. PRAKASH RAO, J
19-10-2010 _________________ B.N. RAO NALLA, J bcj
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!