Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Brij Lal vs State Of Rajasthan
2025 Latest Caselaw 13764 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 13764 Raj
Judgement Date : 25 September, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Brij Lal vs State Of Rajasthan on 25 September, 2025

     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
              S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 2290/2025

Brij Lal S/o Shri Hariram, Aged About 46 Years, R/o 2/3 Rjm
Rozari,   Police    Station       New        Mandi         Gharsana,   District
Sriganganagar.
                                                                  ----Appellant
                                   Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
                                                                ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)         :     Mr. Jayant Garg
For Respondent(s)        :     Mr. Narendra Gehlot, PP
                               Mr. Omprakash Choudhary



              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHAH

Order

25/09/2025

IN S.B. Criminal Appeal (SB) No.2290/2025:-

1. Admit.

2. Call for the record.

IN S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application

No.1803/2025:-

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant-applicant as well as

learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on

record.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant-applicant submits that the

appellant-applicant has been convicted for offences punishable

under Sections 323 & 326 IPC. He submits that the punishment

imposed upon the appellant-applicant is three years' simple

imprisonment. He also submits that the case pertains to a simple

injury, and the weapon recovered is not a sharp-edged weapon,

(Uploaded on 25/09/2025 at 06:46:22 PM)

(2 of 3) [CRLAS-2290/2025]

whereas the injury has been attributed to a sharp-edged weapon.

He further submits that the appellant-applicant was on bail during

the course of trial, and there is no chance of hearing of the appeal

in near future. He, therefore, implores this Court to allow the

suspension of sentence application.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the application for

suspension of sentence and submits that the learned Trial Court,

after considering the evidence threadbare, has rightly convicted

the appellant-applicant for the offences in question, the appellant-

applicant is not entitled for any indulgence from this Court.

4. Upon consideration of the arguments advanced on behalf of

both the sides and having regard to the facts and circumstances of

the case, including the facts that the punishment imposed upon

the appellant-applicant is only thee years' simple imprisonment,

he was on bail during the course of trial, the appellant-applicant

has raised arguable points, and the chances of hearing of appeal

in near future being bleak, this Court is of the opinion that it is a

fit case for suspending the sentences awarded to the accused

appellant-applicant.

5. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed

under Section 430 of BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the

sentence passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention

of Atrocities) Cases, District Sriganganagar, vide judgment dated

26.08.2025 in Session Case No.45/2015 (CIS No.45/2015),

against the appellant-applicant; Brij Lal S/o Shri Hariram, shall

remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and he

shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in

the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to

(Uploaded on 25/09/2025 at 06:46:22 PM)

(3 of 3) [CRLAS-2290/2025]

the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this

court on 28.10.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the

disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

6. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the appellant-applicant in a separate file. Such file be registered

as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the

appellant-applicant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order

shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc.

file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating

to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the

said appellant-applicant does not appear before the trial court, the

learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

cancellation of bail.

(SANDEEP SHAH),J 208-devrajP/-

(Uploaded on 25/09/2025 at 06:46:22 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter