Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bhupendra Alias Roopa Ram vs State Of Rajasthan
2025 Latest Caselaw 15066 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 15066 Raj
Judgement Date : 7 November, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Bhupendra Alias Roopa Ram vs State Of Rajasthan on 7 November, 2025

     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
               S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 2560/2025

Bhupendra Alias Roopa Ram S/o Shri Nava Ram, Aged About 25
Years, R/o Fatapur Police Station Sumerpur District Pali
                                                                    ----Appellant
                                    Versus
1.        State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2.        Prakash Kumar S/o Shri Hansa Ram, R/o Paldi PS
          Sumerpur District Pali
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Appellant(s)          :     Mr. Saurabh Soni
                                Mr. Ghanshyam Dewasi
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Shri Ram Choudhary, PP



              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHAH

Order

07/11/2025

IN S.B. Criminal Appeal (SB) No. 2560/2025:-

1. Admit.

2. Call for record.

IN S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application for Suspension of

Sentence No.2087/2025:-

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant-applicant as well as

learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on

record.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant-applicant submits that the

offences under Schedule Castes and Schedule Tribes (Prevention

of Atrocities) Act, 1989 are not proved as the incident occurred at

a place which was not within public view. He further submits that

the injury could not be proved, the punishment imposed is 1 year

(Uploaded on 07/11/2025 at 05:08:10 PM)

(2 of 3) [CRLAS-2560/2025]

simple imprisonment and the hearing of the appeal will take

sufficient time. He, therefore, implores this Court to allow the

present application for suspension of sentence.

3. Per contra, the learned Public Prosecutor opposes the

application for suspension of sentence and submits that the

learned Trial Court has considered each and every aspect of the

matter threadbare and thereafter the conviction order has been

passed, and therefore, the accused-appellant is not entitled for

any indulgence whatsoever.

4. Upon consideration of the arguments advanced on behalf of

the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of

the case, including the facts that there are arguable points raised

by learned counsel for the appellant-applicant, conviction imposed

is 1 year simple imprisonment and the chances of hearing of

appeal in near future being bleak, this Court is of the opinion that

it is a fit case for suspending the sentence awarded to the

accused-appellant.

5. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed

under Section 389 of Cr.P.C./ Section 430 of BNSS, 2023 is

allowed and it is ordered that the sentence passed by the learned

Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Pali, vide

judgment dated 08.10.2025 in Sessions Case No. 31/2022 against

the applicant Bhupendra Alias Roopa Ram S/o Shri Nava

Ram shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid

appeal and he shall be released on bail, provided he executes a

personal bond in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- with two sureties of

Rs.1,00,000/-, each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge

for his appearance in this court on 10.12.2025 and whenever

(Uploaded on 07/11/2025 at 05:08:10 PM)

(3 of 3) [CRLAS-2560/2025]

ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions

indicated below:-

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

6. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered

as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the

accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this

order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal

Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose

relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In

case the said accused-applicant(s) does/do not appear before the

trial Court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the

High Court for cancellation of bail.

(SANDEEP SHAH),J 55-charul/-

(Uploaded on 07/11/2025 at 05:08:10 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter