Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dr. Chandu Ram Gadi vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:29960)
2025 Latest Caselaw 2094 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2094 Raj
Judgement Date : 10 July, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Dr. Chandu Ram Gadi vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:29960) on 10 July, 2025

Author: Vinit Kumar Mathur
Bench: Vinit Kumar Mathur
[2025:RJ-JD:29960]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13109/2025

1.       Dr. Chandu Ram Gadi S/o Shri Rana Ram Gadi, Aged
         About 44 Years, R/o Village And Post Devikot, District
         Jaisalmer,       Presently        Serving       As     Assistant       Professor,
         Choudhary Kheta Ram Govt. College, Bhaniyana, District
         Jaisalmer (Raj.)
2.       Rohit Garg S/o Shri Buta Ram Garg, Aged About 49
         Years, R/o 25Ab, Dattatrey Nagar, Gudli, Rajsamand,
         District     Rajsamand,           Presently        Serving       As    Assistant
         Professor, Govt. College, Amet, District Rajsamand (Raj.)
3.       Dr. Nema Ram Garg S/o Shri Arjun Ram Garg, Aged
         About 47 Years, R/o Village And Post Bhakharani, Tehsil
         Fatehgarh,        District       Jaisalmer,        Presently      Serving     As
         Assistant Professor, Govt. College, Fatehgarh, District
         Jaisalmer (Raj.)
4.       Dr. Khevara Ram S/o Shri Chuna Ram, Aged About 49
         Years, R/o Village And Post Dabla, District Jaisalmer,
         Presently Serving As Assistant Professor, Govt. College,
         Fatehgarh, District Jaisalmer (Raj.)
                                                                         ----Petitioners
                                         Versus
1.       State       Of   Rajasthan,         Through         Its      Secretary    Higher
         Education Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.       The Commissioner, Department Of College Education,
         Block Iv, Dr. S. Radhakrishnan Shiksha Sankul, Jln Marg,
         Jaipur.
3.       Rajasthan College Education Society, Through The Ex-
         Officio Secretary, Executive Committee, Rajasthan College
         Education Society, Block Iv, Dr. S. Radhakrishnan Shiksha
         Sankul, Jln Marg, Jaipur Cum Additional Commissioner,
         College Education Department, Jaipur.
4.       The     Joint      Director       (Hrd),       Department         Of     College
         Education, Block Iv, Dr. S. Radhakrishnan Siksha Sankul
         Jln Marg Jaipur.
5.       The Principal, Choudhary Kheta Arm Govt. College,
         Bhaniyana, District Jaisalmer (Raj.)
6.       The     Principal,       Government            College,        Amet,     District
         Rajsamand (Raj.)

                          (Downloaded on 10/07/2025 at 09:44:56 PM)
 [2025:RJ-JD:29960]                   (2 of 3)                       [CW-13109/2025]


7.       The Principal, Govt. College, Fatehgarh, District Jaisalmer
         (Raj.)
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. K. L. Chauhan
For Respondent(s)         :     Dr. Praveen Khandelwal, AAG with
                                Mr. Piyush Bhandari.



         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Order

10/07/2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The present writ petition has been filed with the following

prayers:-

"(1) That the impugned action of the Respondents in terminating the services of the Petitioners after every session and every now and then, may be condemned and the Respondents may be directed to continue the petitioners on their said place of posting until the joining of the regularly selected candidates.

(2). That the respondents may kindly be restrained from issuing advertisements and discontinuing the services of the petitioners and may be directed to grant priority and preference to petitioners in their respective colleges in the light of Ram Chaturvedi's case decided by this Hon'ble Court at Jaipur Bench and continue the services of the petitioners till the vacant available posts are not being filled by the respondents through regular recruitment process.

(3). The advertisements passed in pursuance to the order dated 21.01.2025 (Annex.-2) and further advertisement (An.3) of similar nature issued by the respondent may kindly be quashed and the respondents may kindly be directed to give priority to the petitioners while making any posting or new engagements. (4). The respondents may kindly be refrained from issuing advertisements for posts on which the petitioners and similarly situated persona are already working and they may not be replaced by any kind of deputation."

[2025:RJ-JD:29960] (3 of 3) [CW-13109/2025]

3. However, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

petitioners will be satisfied if a liberty is granted to them to file an

appropriate representation before the respondent-authorities for

redressal of their grievances and the respondents may be directed

to decide the same in accordance with law while keeping in mind

the judgments rendered by this Court as well as circulars issued

by the respondents.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in case

such representation is filed, the same shall be considered and

decided by keeping in mind the judgment rendered by this Court

at Jaipur Bench dated 28.08.2023 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition

No.1474/2023 (Ram Chaturvedi & Ors. Vs. State of

Rajasthan & Ors.) as well as the circulars issued in compliance

thereof dated 17.11.2021, 26.07.2024, 18.03.2025, 20.03.2025

& 28.04.2025 issued by the respondents expeditiously.

5. In view of the submissions made before this Court, the

present writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioners

to file an appropriate representation before the respondents for

redressal of their grievances and in case such representation is

filed, the respondents are directed to decide the same while

keeping in mind the judgments rendered by this Court as well as

circulars issued by the respondents at the earliest preferably

within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of such

representation, strictly in accordance with law.

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 238-SanjayS/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter