Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jamuna Gurjar vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:28339)
2025 Latest Caselaw 1586 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1586 Raj
Judgement Date : 1 July, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Jamuna Gurjar vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:28339) on 1 July, 2025

Author: Kuldeep Mathur
Bench: Kuldeep Mathur
[2025:RJ-JD:28339]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
               S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1900/2025

1.       Jamuna Gurjar D/o Kanaram Gurjar, Aged About 19
         Years, Resident Jadan Tehsil Sarvar District Ajmer At
         Present R/o Shahoura Tehsil Shahpura, Dist Bhilwara
2.       Devraj Gurjar S/o Ramdhan Gurjar, Aged About 23 Years,
         Resident Jadan Tehsil Sarvar District Ajmer At Present Ro
         Shahpura Tehsil Shahpura District Bhilwara
                                                                     ----Petitioners
                                    Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Dept Of Home ,
         Govt Of Raj. Jaipur
2.       The Superintendent Of Police, Bhilwara
3.       The    Additional    Superintendent            Of       Police,   Shahpura
         Bhilwara
4.       The Superintendent Of Police, Ajmer
5.       The Deputy Superintedent Of Police, Kekdi Ajmer
6.       The Additional Superintendent Of Police, Kekdi Ajmer
7.       The Sho, Police Station Sarvar Ajmer
8.       Kana Chachiyar Gurjar S/o Shri Kishan Chachiyar, R/o
         Jadana Tehsil Sarvar District Ajmer
9.       Ratan Lal Chachiyar S/o Kishan Chachiyar, R/o Jadana
         Tehsil Sarvar District Ajmer
10.      Kanaram Chachiyar S/o Soji Chachiyar, R/o Jadana Tehsil
         Sarvar District Ajmer
11.      Hardayal Chachiyar S/o Shri Bhairu Chachiyar, R/o Jadana
         Tehsil Sarvar District Ajmer
12.      Dhiraj Gurjar S/o Shri Chothu Chachiyar, R/o Jadana
         Tehsil Sarvar District Ajmer
13.      Harisham Chachiyar S/o Lala Chachiyar, R/o Jadana Tehsil
         Sarvar District Ajmer
14.      Bharat Chachiyar S/o Raychand Chachiyar, R/o Jadana
         Tehsil Sarvar District Ajmer
15.      Manoj Sharma S/o Girdhar Sharma, R/o Jadana Tehsil
         Sarvar District Ajmer
16.      Pradhan Bhadana Gurjar S/o Bhanwar Bhadana Gurjar, R/
         o Jadana Tehsil Sarvar District Ajmer

                     (Downloaded on 02/07/2025 at 09:42:56 PM)
 [2025:RJ-JD:28339]                   (2 of 3)                      [CRLW-1900/2025]


17.      Bhanwar Bhadana Gurjar S/o Ugma Bhadana Gurjar, R/o
         Dhigariya Tehsil Sarvar District Ajmer
18.      Shaitan Bhadana Gurjar S/o Bhanwar Bhadana Gurjar, R/
         o Dhigariya , Tehsil Sarvar , Dist Ajmer (Raj)
19.      Gopal Tendva Gurjar S/o Ladutendva Gurjar, R/o Dorai
         Kekdi District Ajmer
20.      Devraj Tendva Gurjar S/o Gopal Tendva Gurjar, R/o Dorai,
         Kekdi, Dist Ajmer
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :    Mr. Mukesh Chandra
For Respondent(s)          :    Mr. Narendra Gehlot, PP



              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Order

01/07/2025

The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the

petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking

direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.

The petitioners both being major persons claim to be in a live

in relationship. They submit that they are living with each other

against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel threat at

the hands of private respondents, who are their relatives. The

petitioners allegedly approached the concerned respondent

authorities with a prayer to be provided with adequate protection

but no heed has been paid to their request so far.

The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and

an ikrarnama verifying the factum of them being in a live in

relationship have been filed on record. Thus, taking cue from the

judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of

Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the

[2025:RJ-JD:28339] (3 of 3) [CRLW-1900/2025]

prayer made by the petitioners for directing the concerned

respondent authorities to provide protection to the petitioners

deserves to be accepted.

The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter

enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be

provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned

respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the

petitioners, who are in a live in relationship.

The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 230-himanshu/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter