Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 11465 Raj
Judgement Date : 16 April, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:18707]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 964/2025
1. Sangeeta W/o Tansukh, Aged About 24 Years, D/o
Budharam R/o Purana Bijligar Ke Pas, Borunda Pipar, Dist.
Jodhpur
2. Tansukh S/o Chenaram, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Van
Vaibhag Ke Pass, Borunda, Pipar, Dist. Jodhpur
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Ministry Of
Home Affairs, Jaipur,raj.
2. The Police Commissioner, Jodhpur
3. The Police Superintendent Of Police, Dist. Jodhpur
4. Station House Officer, P.s. Borunda, Jodhpur
5. Nenaram S/o Jasaram, R/o Purana Bijaligar Ke Pass,
Bournda, Pipar,dist. Jodhpur
6. Chimnaram S/o Jasaram, R/o Purana Bijaligar Ke Pass,
Bournda, Pipar,dist. Jodhpur
7. Dhaglaram S/o Jasaram, R/o Purana Bijaligar Ke Pass,
Bournda, Pipar,dist. Jodhpur
8. Budharam S/o Jasaram, R/o Purana Bijaligar Ke Pass,
Bournda, Pipar,dist. Jodhpur
9. Shyamlal S/o Nenaram, R/o Purana Bijaligar Ke Pass,
Bournda, Pipar,dist. Jodhpur
10. Sumer S/o Chimanram, R/o Purana Bijaligar Ke Pass,
Bournda, Pipar,dist. Jodhpur
11. Kishore S/o Nenaram, R/o Purana Bijaligar Ke Pass,
Bournda, Pipar,dist. Jodhpur
12. Gajendra S/o Chimanaram, R/o Purana Bijaligar Ke Pass,
Bournda, Pipar,dist. Jodhpur
13. Prabhu S/o Dhaglaram, R/o Purana Bijaligar Ke Pass,
Bournda, Pipar,dist. Jodhpur
14. Dharmendra S/o Dhaglaram, R/o Purana Bijaligar Ke
Pass, Bournda, Pipar,dist. Jodhpur
15. Bhagirath S/o Budharam, R/o Purana Bijaligar Ke Pass,
Bournda, Pipar,dist. Jodhpur
16. Bansi Lal S/o Manglaram, R/o Sardar Samand Road, Dist.
(Downloaded on 16/04/2025 at 09:39:34 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:18707] (2 of 3) [CRLW-964/2025]
Pali
17. Dinesh S/o Bansi Lal, R/o Sardar Samand Road, Dist. Pali
18. Surendra S/o Bansilal, R/o Sardar Samand Road, Dist.
Pali
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Leeladhar
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Lalit Kishore Sen, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
16/04/2025
The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the
petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking
direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.
The petitioners both being major persons claim to have
performed a love marriage. They submit that the marriage was
performed against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel
threat to their lives at the hands of private respondents, who are
their relatives. The petitioners allegedly approached the concerned
respondent authorities, with a prayer to be provided with
adequate protection but no heed has been paid to their request so
far.
The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and
the marriage ceremony performed between them have been filed
on record. Thus, taking cue from the judgment rendered by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the prayer made by the petitioners
[2025:RJ-JD:18707] (3 of 3) [CRLW-964/2025]
for directing the concerned respondent authorities to provide
protection to the petitioners deserves to be accepted.
The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter
enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be
provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned
respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the
petitioners, who have performed a love marriage.
The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 240-divya/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!