Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Daulat Choudhary vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:17884)
2025 Latest Caselaw 11196 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 11196 Raj
Judgement Date : 7 April, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Daulat Choudhary vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:17884) on 7 April, 2025

[2025:RJ-JD:17884]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7488/2025

1.       Daulat Choudhary S/o Shri Jeeva Ram, Aged About 41
         Years, Resident Of 406, A Dhani, Village Pilowani, Tehsil
         Rani, District Pali.
2.       Manorama Kararwal D/o Shri Rajpal, Aged About 35
         Years, Resident Of Kumharawala, 59 Rb, Raisinghnagar,
         Ganganagar.
3.       Geetika Tak D/o Shri Ramesh Tak, Aged About 31 Years,
         Resident Of Rathodikuwa, Nagaur.
4.       Suresh Chand Jorwal S/o Shri Chhuttan Lal Jorwal, Aged
         About 39 Years, Resident Of Village Tahatara, Tehsil Raini,
         Dist. Alwar.
5.       Jaipal Yadav S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Yadav, Aged About
         36 Years, Resident Of Dhani Hiron Ki Parasrampura,
         Sargoth, Sikar.
6.       Mukesh Kumar Jat S/o Shri Girdhari Lal, Aged About 40
         Years, Resident Of Satavas, Shahpura, Jaje Kalan, Jaipur.
7.       Manish Kumar Meena S/o Shri Prem Chand Meena, Aged
         About 31 Years, Resident Of Jyotipura, Ghar, Tonk.
8.       Chhitar Singh Solanki S/o Shri Manohar Singh Solanki,
         Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Kachnariya, Bundi.
9.       Shankar Lal Choudhary S/o Shri Balu Ram Choudhary,
         Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of 371, Harda Ki Dhani,
         Dhasook, Ajmer.
10.      Ravi Kumar Jat S/o Shri Arjun Lal Jat, Aged About 27
         Years, Resident Of Dhani Dolyawali, Tehsil Amer, Gram
         Ghatwara Jatanwali, District Jaipur.
11.      Jitendra Singh Devanda S/o Shri Birbal Singh Devanda,
         Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Dhani Devanda Wali,
         Ward No. 16, Mahroli Sikar, Sri Madhopur.
12.      Manju Meena D/o Shri Brahm Deo Meena, Aged About 29
         Years, Resident Of Vpo Newar, Aandhi, Dist Jaipur.
13.      Sitaram S/o Shri Jagu Ram, Aged About 45 Years,
         Resident Of Village Jugrajpura, Ajeetagarh, Sikar.
14.      Gokul Kumar Verma S/o Shri Kajod, Aged About 33 Years,
         Resident Of Raigar Gangwada, Sawai Madhopur.



                        (Downloaded on 10/04/2025 at 09:33:46 PM)
 [2025:RJ-JD:17884]                      (2 of 3)                        [CW-7488/2025]


15.      Hanuman Ram Meghwal S/o Shri Badri Ram Meghwal,
         Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 07, Karshi
         Mandi Road, Degana, Nagaur.
16.      Bharat Kumar Bansal S/o Shri Buddha Lal, Aged About 51
         Years,      Resident      Of     Naya       Shahar,        Regran    Mohalla
         Kishangarh, Ajmer.
                                                                      ----Petitioners
                                        Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
         Of   Rural     Development           And      Panchayati      Raj,    Jaipur,
         Rajasthan.
2.       The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner, District
         Bikaner, Rajasthan.
                                                                    ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)            :     Mr. Kailash Choudhary
For Respondent(s)            :



               HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

Order (Oral)

07/04/2025

1. Petitioners herein are before this Court seeking directions to

the respondents to give the service benefits, seniority and notional

benefit as was given to the candidates, who were selected /

appointed for the post of Teacher Gr.III, Leve-III pursuant to the

advertisement dated 31.07.2018 (Annex.1).

2. At the outset, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the

petitioner that the issue raised in the present writ petition is

covered by an order dated 16.07.2014 passed by the Jaipur Bench

of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7283/2014 :

Manoj Khandelwal & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. He

submits that the petitioner is sanguine that, in case they are

[2025:RJ-JD:17884] (3 of 3) [CW-7488/2025]

allowed to file a representation qua the grievance raised in the

present writ petition and the same is considered in light of the

aforesaid judgment, they will be meted out with favorable

treatment.

3. In view of the aforesaid, without commenting on the merits

of the case, the petition filed by the petitioners is disposed of with

a direction to the competent authority to decide the

representation (may file fresh, if not already filed) of the

petitioners, in accordance with law, keeping in view the

observations made in the case of Manoj Khandelwal (supra), as

expeditiously as possible.

4. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

(ARUN MONGA),J 204-SP/skm/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter