Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 11186 Raj
Judgement Date : 7 April, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:17987]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2755/2025
Birmaram S/o Jairam Ji Baniwal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o
Vishnoiyon Ka Bass, Jaliyali, P.s. Jhanwar Dist Jodhpur
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashok Khillery
For Respondent(s) : Mr. VS Rajpurohit, Dy.G.A.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
07/04/2025
1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, challenge
has been made to the order dated 04.03.2025 passed by the
learned Special Judge, NDPS Act Cases, Beghu, District
Chittorgarh in Criminal Misc. Case No.123/2025 pertaining to FIR
No. 32/2025 registered at Police Station Beghu, District
Chittorgarh whereby the application filed by the petitioner for
releasing the vehicle in question (Marutri Car) bearing registration
No. RJ 31 CA 1521, Aadhar Card, Pen Card, Driving Licence,
Mobile has been declined.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is the
owner of the vehicle and mobile in question which have been
seized by the Police Officers. He further submits that the petitioner
being the owner of the vehicle and mobile in question, is the
[2025:RJ-JD:17987] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-2755/2025]
person best entitled to get back the possession of the seized
property. There is no other person claiming supurdagi of the
same. He further submits that the petitioner needs his aadhar
card, pen card and driving license for his personal use.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the instant criminal misc.
petition.
4. Considering the submissions and following the judgment
rendered by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of
Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat, reported in
AIR 2003 SC 638 and the order dated 18.11.2022 passed by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No.2005/2022 [SLP
(Crl.) No.7280/2022) titled as Sainaba Vs. The State of Kerala
& Anr., wherein, the vehicle involved in a crime under NDPS Act
was directed to be released on terms and conditions to be
determined by the Special Court, the criminal misc. petition is
allowed and this Court deems it just and appropriate to release
the vehicle in question in favour of the petitioner on interim
custody till conclusion of the trial provided he furnishes a
Supurdaginama of Rs. 3,00,000/- and surety of like amount to the
satisfaction of the Court below. It is also directed that the aadhar
card, pen card and license of the petitioner shall also be released
after keeping photo copies of the same on record by the learned
trial Court.
5. Since, mobile of the petitioner may be required as a piece of
evidence, no order of its release is passed at this stage.
[2025:RJ-JD:17987] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-2755/2025]
Appropriate directions in this regard may be issued after the
statement of the Seizing Officer is recorded during the trial.
(FARJAND ALI),J 84-divya/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!