Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5187 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 21 September, 2023
[2023:RJ-JP:24341]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 14/2022
In
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10186/2021
Barma Kumari Meena D/o Shri Goverdhan Meena And W/o Shri
Raju Meena, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Satwara, Tehsil
Dooni, District Tonk At Present Posted As Nurse Grade II (GNM)
PHC, PPP Mode, Kalmanda, Malpura, District Tonk, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Mr. Vaibhav Galriya, State Of Rajasthan Through The
Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department,
Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
2. Mr. Mukul Sharma, The Directorate Of Medical And Health
Department, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme,
Jaipur (Rajasthan.)
3. Dr. Ashok Kumar Yadav, The Chief Medical And Health
Office, District Tonk (Rajasthan.)
4. Dr. Sunil Kumar Yadav, Medical Officer Incharge,
Government Primary Centre, Kalmanda, Malpura, District
Tonk (Rajasthan.)
5. Mr. Nemichand Nitharwal (Director,), The Jal Kalyan And
Rehabilitation And Development Society, Chomu Through
Its Director,
6. State Of Rajasthan Through The Principal Secretary,
Medical And Health Department, Government Secretariat,
Jaipur (Rajasthan.)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmi Kant Malpura For Respondent(s) : Dr. V.B. Sharma, AAG with Mr. Aman Bhargava Mr. Prateek Mathur
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Judgment / Order
[2023:RJ-JP:24341] (2 of 2) [CCP-14/2022]
21/09/2023
This contempt petition has been filed alleging wilful
disobedience of the order dated 14.09.2021 whereby, the
respondents were directed to decide the representation filed by
the petitioner by a detailed speaking order.
Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted a copy of
the order dated 20.06.2023 passed by the Medical Officer
Incharge, Government Primary Centre, Kalmanda, Malpura,
District Tonk for perusal of this court. The copy of the order is
taken on record.
Inviting attention of this Court towards the aforesaid order,
learned counsel submits that the representation filed by the
petitioner has been decided vide speaking order. He, therefore,
prays for dismissal of the contempt petition.
Learned counsel for the petitioner did not dispute the
decision of the representation filed by her.
In view thereof, this contempt petition is dismissed.
Notices are discharged.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
Sudha/91
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!