Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6459 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 3 November, 2023
[2023:RJ-JP:32801]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 475/2023
In
S. B Civil Writ No. 8603/2021
Babu Lal S/o Chhitar Lal, Aged About 66 Years (Senior Citizen)
R/o Kali Paltan Road Ghosi Mohollaha Tonk Rajasthan Retired
Post Of Conductor RSRTC Depot Tonk Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Shri Nathmal Didel, Chairman Cum Managing Director,
Rajasthan State Road Corporation Head Office Chomu
House Parivahan Marg Jaipur Rajasthan.
2. Shri Ramchandra Gochar Chief Manager, Rajasthan State
Road Transport Corporation Depot Tonk Rajasthan.
---- Contemnors/Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.B. Sharma Ganthola For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Judgment / Order
03/11/2023
This contempt petition has been filed alleging wilful
disobedience of the order dated 12.08.2021 passed by this Court
whereby, the writ petition was disposed of in terms of judgment
dated 16.02.2021 passed by this Court in case of Krishan Gopal
Sharma Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation &
Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5883/2020.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although, the
petitioner has been paid gratuity and other retiral benefits; but, he
has not been paid certain allowances and interest. He, therefore,
[2023:RJ-JP:32801] (2 of 2) [CCP-475/2023]
prays that the respondents may be directed to purge the contempt
and they may also be punished suitably.
Heard. Considered.
This Court has, vide order dated 12.08.2021, contempt
whereof is alleged, disposed of the writ petition in the light of
direction contained in case of Krishan Gopal Sharma (supra)
which in turn was disposed of in terms of judgment passed by this
Court in case of Bhori LaL Meena Vs. Rajasthan State Road
Transport Corporation: S.B. Civil Writ Petition
No.11474/2019 wherein, the respondent-corporation was
directed to make due payment to the petitioner as and when turn
comes for considering grant of such benefits as per the scheme
framed by this Court.
Learned counsel for the petitioner could not satisfy this Court
that as per the scheme framed by this Court for payment of retiral
dues including interest and allowances, his turn has come and he
has not been paid the payment.
In view thereof, no contempt is made out. The contempt
petition is dismissed.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
Sudha/47
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!