Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vipin Kumar Agarwal, Son Of Shri ... vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 6319 Raj/2

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6319 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 22 September, 2022

Rajasthan High Court
Vipin Kumar Agarwal, Son Of Shri ... vs State Of Rajasthan on 22 September, 2022
Bench: Mahendar Kumar Goyal
       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                   BENCH AT JAIPUR

               S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6108/2020

Vipin Kumar Agarwal, Son Of Shri Pooran Chand, Through Power
Of Attorney Holder Triloki Nath Sharma, Son Of Shri Krishna Hari
Sharma, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of 56, Yaduraj Nagar,
District Bharatpur (Rajasthan).
                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                   Versus
1.      State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of
        Mines And Geology, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.      Joint Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Mines (Group-2)
        Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.
3.      Additional Director, Mines (E & D), Mines And Geology
        Department, Udaipur
4.      Mining Engineer, Department Of Mines And Geology,
        Bharatpur
                                                                ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashwani Kumar Chobisa For Respondent(s) : Mr. Zakir Hussain, Addl.G.C. with Mr. Ajay Khandal

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL

Order

22/09/2022 The matter comes up on an application (1/2022) filed by the

petitioner seeking disposal of the writ petition in the light of order

of this Court passed in case of Geeta Devi vs. State of

Rajasthan Through its Principal Secretary, Department of

Mines & Petroleum, Jaipur & Ors.: 2020(1) DNJ (Raj.) 381.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his appeal

was dismissed by the appellate authority on the ground of

(2 of 2) [CW-6108/2020]

limitation and as per dictum of a Division Bench in case of Geeta

Devi (supra), the matter requires reconsideration on merit.

Learned counsel for the respondents did not dispute the

aforesaid legal position.

In view thereof, the application deserves to be allowed. The

application is allowed accordingly.

The matter is remanded back to the appellate authority, i.e.,

Additional Director, Mines for decision of the appeal on its merit in

view of the judgment of this Court in case of Geeta Devi (supra).

The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.

(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J

MADAN/26

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter