Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1830 Patna
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.1149 of 2019
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14408 of 2014
======================================================
1. Sunita Devi, Wife of Kuar Vijay Pal Singh, Resident of Dadari Dhanraj, P.O.
N.H. Bangra, P.S. Kothiya, District Samastipur.
2. Ranjit Poddar, Son of Late Deo Nandan Poddar, Resident of Village- Bharo
Khara Poddar Tola, Ward No. 13, P.O. Tajpur, Block Tajpur, District-
Samastipur.
3. Suresh Sah, Son of Late Subelal Sah, Resident of Village and Post-Gauspur
Sarsauna, P.S. N.H. Bengra, District- Samastipur.
... ... Appellants.
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms,
Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The District Collector, Samastipur.
4. The District Land Acquisition Officer, Samastipur.
5. The Circle Officer, Samastipur.
... ... Respondents.
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellants : Mr. Devendra Kumar, Advocate.
For the State : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, GA-2.
Mr. Rajan Prakash, AC to GA-2.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)
Date : 17-02-2025
Appellants have assailed the order of the learned
Single Judge dated 09.08.2019 passed in C.W.J.C. No.14408 of
2014.
2. In the writ petition (C.W.J.C. No.14408 of 2014),
appellants have prayed for the following relief(s):
Patna High Court L.P.A No.1149 of 2019 dt.17-02-2025
"(i) To determine the compensation and prepare the Award on account of land acquired of petitioners under the provisions of Land Acquisition Act as presently applicable.
(ii) To declare that Land Acquisition proceeding has lapsed as Award has not been prepared within 2 years from date of Notification.
(iii) To declare that there were no grounds for invoking urgency Clause under the land Acquisition proceeding.
(iv) To grant such other relief/reliefs to which petitioner is found entitled."
3. Having regard to the facts that the appellants have
accepted 80% of the award, what remains as on the date of
deciding the writ petition is whether appellants are entitled to
remaining 20% of the award or not? In this regard, the learned
Single Judge has proceeded to pass order, directing the
concerned authority to decide 20% award in favour of the
appellants. Still feeling aggrieved by the order of the learned
Single Judge, the present L.P.A. has been filed.
4. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that
the appellants are stated to have received 20% amount of
Rs.975588/- on 15.10.2016.
Patna High Court L.P.A No.1149 of 2019 dt.17-02-2025
5. Today, learned counsel for the appellants submitted
that adjacent land has been treated as a commercial property and
extended award in treating as a commercial value. Therefore,
appellants' property should also be treated as a commercial
property. This issue cannot be adjudicated in the present L.P.A.
In that event, appellants have a remedy of filing necessary
litigation before the next higher forum insofar as challenging the
award. Therefore, appellants are at liberty to invoke such
remedy available to them insofar as assailing the award and in
accordance with law.
6. In the light of the aforementioned observations, the
order of the learned Single Judge would not be a hurdle insofar
as assailing the award passed by the authority, in accordance
with law.
7. L.P.A. stands disposed of.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J)
( Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
P.S./-
AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 21.02.2025. Transmission Date NA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!