Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bharat Prasad vs The State Of Bihar
2024 Latest Caselaw 814 Patna

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 814 Patna
Judgement Date : 2 February, 2024

Patna High Court

Bharat Prasad vs The State Of Bihar on 2 February, 2024

Author: Purnendu Singh

Bench: Purnendu Singh

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2030 of 2024
     ======================================================
     Bharat Prasad Son of Late Bindeshwari Sah Resident of Village- Patkhauli,
     Ward No. 14, P.O.- Mushahari, P.S.- Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at
     Bettiah, Presently Pramukh, Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti, District-
     West Champaran at Bettiah.

                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                       Versus
1.   The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.   The Additional Chief Secretary,Panchayati Raj Department, Government of
     Bihar, Patna.
3.   The District Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah, District- West
     Champaran at Bettiah.
4.   The District Panchayat Raj Officer, West Champaran at Bettiah, District-
     West Champaran at Bettiah,
5.   The Block Development Officer-cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat
     Samiti, Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Bettiah,
6.   Manju Devi Wife of not known to the Petitioner Presently Up-Pramukh,
     Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti, P.O. and P.S.- Yogapatti, District- West
     Champaran at Bettiah,
7.   Ram Prabha Devi Wife of not known to the Petitioner The Elected Member
     of Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti through the Block Development
     Officer-cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti, P.O. and
     P.S.- Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Bettiah.
8.   Subhagwati Devi wife of not known to the Petitioner The Elected Member
     of Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti through the Block Development
     Officer-cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti, P.O. and
     P.S.- Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Bettiah.
9.   Meena Devi Wife of not known to the Petitioner The Elected Member of
     Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti through the Block Development Officer-
     cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti, P.O. and P.S.-
     Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Bettiah.
10. Chhotelal Manjhi Son of not known to the Petitioner The Elected Member of
    Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti through the Block Development Officer-
    cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti, P.O. and P.S.-
    Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Bettiah.
11. Bhanu Yadav son of not known to the petitioner The Elected Member of
    Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti through the Block Development Officer-
    cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti, P.O. and P.S.-
    Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Bettiah.
12. Dhurendra Sah son of not known to the petitioner The Elected Member of
    Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti through the Block Development Officer-
    cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti, P.O. and P.S.-
    Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Bettiah.
13. Naresh Prasad Son of not known to the Petitioner The Elected Member of
 Patna High Court CWJC No.2030 of 2024 dt.02-02-2024
                                           2/7




        Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti through the Block Development Officer-
        cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti, P.O. and P.S.-
        Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Bettiah.
  14. Akali Devi wife of not known to the Petitioner The Elected Member of
      Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti through the Block Development Officer-
      cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti, P.O. and P.S.-
      Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Bettiah.
  15. Munni Devi wife of not known to the petitioner The Elected Member of
      Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti through the Block Development Officer-
      cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti, P.O. and P.S.-
      Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Bettiah.
  16. Tara Devi wife of not known to the petitioner The Elected Member of Block
      Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti through the Block Development Officer-cum-
      Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti, P.O. and P.S.-
      Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Bettiah.
  17. Guriya Devi wife of not known to the Petitioner The Elected Member of
      Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti through the Block Development Officer-
      cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti, P.O. and P.S.-
      Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Bettiah.
  18. Mobina Khatoon wife of not known to the Petitioner The Elected Member of
      Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti through the Block Development Officer-
      cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti, P.O. and P.S.-
      Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Bettiah.
  19. Manorma Devi wife of not known to the petitioner The Elected Member of
      Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti through the Block Development Officer-
      cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti, P.O. and P.S.-
      Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Bettiah.
  20. Gayatri Devi wife of not known to the Petitioner The Elected Member of
      Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti through the Block Development Officer-
      cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti, P.O. and P.S.-
      Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Bettiah.
  21. Sheela Devi wife of not known to the petitioner The Elected Member of
      Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti through the Block Development Officer-
      cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti, P.O. and P.S.-
      Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Bettiah.
  22. Malti Devi wife of not known to the Petitioner The Elected Member of
      Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti through the Block Development Officer-
      cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti, P.O. and P.S.-
      Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Bettiah.
  23. Yogesh Prasad son of not known to the petitioner The Elected Member of
      Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti through the Block Development Officer-
      cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti, P.O. and P.S.-
      Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Bettiah.
  24. Santosh Baitha son of not known to the p0etitioner The Elected Member of
      Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti through the Block Development Officer-
      cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti, P.O. and P.S.-
      Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Bettiah.
 Patna High Court CWJC No.2030 of 2024 dt.02-02-2024
                                           3/7




  25. Chinta Devi wife of not known to the Petitioner The Elected Member of
      Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti through the Block Development Officer-
      cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti, P.O. and P.S.-
      Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Bettiah.
  26. Rustam Alam son of not known to the Petitioner The Elected Member of
      Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti through the Block Development Officer-
      cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti, P.O. and P.S.-
      Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Bettiah.
  27. Manju Devi wife of not known to the Petitioner The Elected Member of
      Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti through the Block Development Officer-
      cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti, P.O. and P.S.-
      Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Bettiah.
  28. Sunil Yadav son of not known to the petitioner The Elected Member of
      Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti through the Block Development Officer-
      cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti, P.O. and P.S.-
      Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Bettiah.
  29. Aisa Khatoon wife of not known to the Petitioner The Elected Member of
      Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti through the Block Development Officer-
      cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti, P.O. and P.S.-
      Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Bettiah.
  30. Ram Shankar Prasad son of not known to the Petitioner The Elected
      Member of Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti through the Block
      Development Officer-cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti,
      Yogapatti, P.O. and P.S.- Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Bettiah.
  31. Sushila Devi wife of not known to the Petitioner The Elected Member of
      Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti through the Block Development Officer-
      cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti, P.O. and P.S.-
      Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Bettiah.

                                                 ... ... Respondent/s
       ======================================================
       Appearance :
       For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. S.B.K. Manglam, Advocate
                                        Mr. Awnish Kumar, Advocate
       For the Respondent/s     :       Mr. S. Raza Ahmad, AAG-5
                                        Md. Kamil Akhtar, AC to AAG-5
       ======================================================
       CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
       ORAL JUDGMENT
         Date : 02-02-2024
                        Heard Mr. S.B.K. Manglam, learned counsel

         appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. S. Raza Ahmad,

         learned AAG -5 for the State.

                      2. Petitioner has filed the writ petition for following
 Patna High Court CWJC No.2030 of 2024 dt.02-02-2024
                                           4/7




         relief(s):

                                       "(I) For issuance of an appropriate writ in the
                         nature of CERTIORARI for quashing the requisition dated
                         09.01.2024

signed by 16 elected members of Block Panchayat Samiti, Yogapatti addressed to the petitioner but submitted in the office of Respondent no. 5 on 09.01.2024, whereby and where under the signatory members had made a grievance from the petitioner to convene the special meeting of the Block Panchayat Samiti for consideration of their No Confidence Motion against the petitioner.

(II) For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of CERTIORARI for quashing the notice of the special meeting issued under the signature of the Respondent no. 5 and contained in his letter no. 53 dated 24.01.2024 whereby and where under he has been pleased to inform the petitioner about the special meeting of Block Panchayat Samiti convened on 03.02.2024 for consideration of No Confidence Motion against the petitioner.

(III) For issuance of any other appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions for which the writ petition would be found entitled under the facts and circumstances of the case."

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

petitioner submitted that the requisitionists have not personally

presented the requisition which was received in the office of the

Block Development Officer on 09.01.2024 and the petitioner

came to know about the requisition that 16 elected members of

the Panchayat Samiti have called for special meeting of 'No

Confidence Motion' against the petitioner on frivolous charges,

which is in violation of Section 44 (3) (iv) of the Bihar

Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act')

and based on the said requisition, the Block Development

Officer in connivance with the interested requisitionists has

fixed the date of special meeting on 03.02.2024, which is not in Patna High Court CWJC No.2030 of 2024 dt.02-02-2024

accordance with the provision of Sections 44 (3) (i) (iv) of the

Act. Learned counsel in these background submitted that the

Block Development Officer is only required to fix a date on the

basis of the recommendation of the Pramukh or Up-Pramukh or

the requisitionists, as the case may be, as in terms of Section 44

(3) (i) of the Act. The action of the Block Development Officer

can be considered to be not in accordance with law as he instead

of directing the requisitionists to present the requisition before

the petitioner, who is the Pramukh, has proceeded to notify the

special meeting of 'No Confidence Motion' on 03.02.2024. The

notice is also devoid of any circumstances being dealt with the

Block Development Officer dealing with the preliminary fact

before he has exercised his jurisdiction in issuing notice that

such request was made by him to the requisitionists.

4. Learned counsel for the State submits that the

petitioner cannot bypass the provision of the Act, especially, the

provisions contained in Section 44 of the Act, which is required

to hold a special meeting once he comes to the knowledge that a

requisition has been made for calling of special meeting of 'No

Confidence Motion' against him. Petitioner has deliberately

tried to mislead this Court by making a statement that the

requisition was never made to him by the requisitionists. Patna High Court CWJC No.2030 of 2024 dt.02-02-2024

5. Having considered the rival submissions made on

behalf of the parties, as well as, the notice contained in Letter

No. 25 dated 09.01.2024 issued under the signature of Block

Development Officer-cum-Executive Officer, Yogapatti, West

Champaran. According to Section 44 (3) (i) of the Act, a

requisition is required to be served to the Block Development

Officer notifying for issuing notice to the elected members of

the Panchayat Samiti including the Pramukh and Up-Pramukh

the date of meeting.

6. I have perused the notice. The notice don't contain

that the said notice has been served upon the elected members

after having dealt the jurisdictional fact. The Block

Development Officer was required to first satisfy himself before

issuing notice by dealing with the jurisdictional fact. In this case

requirement was that, as to whether, the record reveals that no

requisition was made before the Pramukh, who is the petitioner

in this case.

7. The existence of jurisdictional facts is sine qua non

or a condition precedent to the assumption of jurisdiction by a

Court, Tribunal or Authority. The Apex Court in the case of

Carona Ltd. v. Parvathy Swaminathan & Sons, (2007) 8

SCC 559, has held as follows:-

Patna High Court CWJC No.2030 of 2024 dt.02-02-2024

"27. Stated simply, the fact or facts upon which the jurisdiction of a court, a tribunal or an authority depends can be said to be a "jurisdictional fact". If the jurisdictional fact exists, a court, tribunal or authority has jurisdiction to decide other issues. If such fact does not exist, a court, tribunal or authority cannot act. It is also well settled that a court or a tribunal cannot wrongly assume existence of jurisdictional fact and proceed to decide a matter. The underlying principle is that by erroneously assuming existence of a jurisdictional fact, a subordinate court or an inferior tribunal cannot confer upon itself jurisdiction which it otherwise does not posses."

8. Considering the fact that in absence of any

jurisdictional fact clearly stated in the notice, the notice

contained in Annxure-P-2 is hereby set aside and quashed and

consequential communication contained in Letter No. 53 dated

24.01.2024 is also set aside and quashed.

9. The petitioner, who came into the knowledge of the

requisition and charges levelled against him on 09.01.2024 must

not refrain from special meeting of 'No Confidence Motion'

which is to be held on 03.02.2024.

10. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/-

AFR/NAFR                N.A.F.R.
CAV DATE                N/A
Uploading Date          02.02.2024
Transmission Date       N/A
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter