Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Lila Kant Jha vs The State Of Bihar
2021 Latest Caselaw 5416 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5416 Patna
Judgement Date : 23 November, 2021

Patna High Court
Lila Kant Jha vs The State Of Bihar on 23 November, 2021
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.200 of 2021
     ======================================================

Lila Kant Jha S/o Valeshawr Jha R/o Village- Beloun, P.o.- Nawada, P.S.- Bahera, Darbhanga, Bihar-847201

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Recourse Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar, patna

3. The District Magistrate, Darbhanga

4. The Superintendent of Police, Darbhanga

5. The Accountant General Bihar, Patna

6. The Treasury Officer, Darbhanga

7. The District Account Officer, Darbhanga

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Puneet Siddhartha, Advocate Mr. Aryan Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. M.N.H. Khan,SC-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 23-11-2021

Heard the learned counsels for the parties.

2. In the instant petition, petitioner has sought for

following reliefs:

"(D) A writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ/s, order/s direction/s quashing the following:

(i) The Memo No. 1145 dated 11.07.2019 (hereinafter referred as 'impugned order') passed by the Respondent No. 4 wherein, Respondent No. 4 has ordered to deduct the excess financial benefit made to the Petitioner during his service from year 2006 to 31.03.2019 from his retirement benefits.

(ii) The Memo no. 2258 dated Patna High Court CWJC No.200 of 2021 dt.23-11-2021

16.11.2019 (hereinafter also referred as 'impugned order') passed by the Respondent No. 4, whereby and whereunder, the Respondent No. 4 has ordered Respondent No. 6 to deduct Rs. 7,61,792/- from the retirement benefit of the Petitioner.

(E) A writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/s, order/s direction/s for the following reliefs:

(iv) To pay the Petitioner Rs. 7,61,792/- along with the interest which has been illegally deducted from the retirement benefit of the Petitioner.

(v) To refix the pay scale and pension amount of the Petitioner which has been illegally reduced by the Respondent Authorities vide memo no. 1145 dated 11.07.2019.

(vi) To pay the arrears of salary and pension along with the interest after refixing the pay scale of the Petitioner.

(F) To any other relief/s to which the petitioner is found entitled to."

3. Undisputed facts are that the petitioner has attained

age of superannuation and retired from service on 31.03.2019

while holding the post of Constable. He has rendered service

from the year 1982. The 4th Respondent noticed that petitioner

has been extended excess financial benefits. After noticing the

aforesaid alleged error, he has proceeded to pass impugned

order dated 11.07.2019 without issuing notice to the petitioner.

On this point, impugned order is hereby set aside.

The 4th Respondent is hereby directed to issue show Patna High Court CWJC No.200 of 2021 dt.23-11-2021

cause notice furnishing the details of excess financial benefits

awarded in favour of the petitioner while he was in service. He is

also directed to point out the relevant provisions of law under

which the financial benefits awarded to the petitioner has been

deducted. On receipt of such notice, the petitioner is hereby

directed to submit his explanation along with relevant provision of

law/ executive order that earlier fixation of financial benefits was

in order. After receipt of petitioner's explanation, the 4 th

respondent is hereby directed to pass a speaking order on each of

the contention to be raised by the petitioner. Petitioner is also

permitted to apprise the 4th respondent in respect of Apex Court's

decision passed in the case of State of Punjab V. Rafiq Masih

reported in (2015) 4 SCC 334.

The above exercise shall be completed within a period of

four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

If any recovery has been made, the same shall be

refunded to the petitioner forthwith.

With the above observations, the instant petition stands

disposed of.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) rakhi/-

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date          29.11.2021
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter