Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dilip Kumar vs The Additional Chief Secretary To ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 8849 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8849 Mad
Judgement Date : 24 November, 2025

Madras High Court

Dilip Kumar vs The Additional Chief Secretary To ... on 24 November, 2025

Author: N.Sathish Kumar
Bench: N.Sathish Kumar
                                                                                             HCP.No.2228 of 2025
                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   DATED 24.11.2025

                                                            CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR . JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

                                                              AND

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN

                                                 H.C.P.No.2228 of 2025

                     Dilip Kumar                                                       ... Petitioner/detenue

                                                             Versus

                     1. The Additional Chief Secretary to Government
                        Home, Prohibition and Excise Department
                        Secretariat, Government of Tamil Nadu
                       Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009

                     2. The Commissioner of Police
                        Greater Chennai

                     3. The Superintendent of Police
                        Central Prison-II
                        Puzhal, Chennai

                     4. The Inspector of Police (L & O)
                        S-4, Nanthambakkam Police Station, Chennai                           ...   Respondents

                     Prayer:- Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution
                     of India praying for a Writ of Habeas Corpus to call for the records
                     pertaining to the order of detention dated on 10.02.2025 passed by the 2nd
                     respondent in No.72/BCDFGISSSV/2025 and quash the same as illegal and
                     1/6




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 27/11/2025 06:07:17 pm )
                                                                                            HCP.No.2228 of 2025
                     direct the respondent to produce the Detenue Thiru. Dilip Kumar
                     S/o.Janakiraman, male aged about 29 years now confined at Central Prison-
                     II, Puzhal, Chennai before this Honble Court and set him at liberty


                                       For Petitioner         :        Mr.S.Senthil Kumar

                                       For Respondents :               Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan
                                                                       Additional Public Prosecutor

                                                                  ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.)

The detenu Dilip Kumar S/o.Janakiraman, male, aged about 29 yrs,

has come forward with this petition challenging the detention order passed

by the second respondent dated 10.02.2025 bearing reference

No.72/BCDFGISSSV/2025 slapped on him, branding him as "Goonda"

under the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers,

Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders,

Sand Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982 [Tamil Nadu

Act 14 of 1982].

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.

3. Though several points have been raised in the petitioner, the

learned counsel for the petitioner in the hearing submitted that the detention

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 27/11/2025 06:07:17 pm )

order is liable to be quashed on the ground that the remand report was not

properly translated to Tamil, which prevented the detenu from making an

effective representation.

4. On a perusal of the Booklet, it is seen that Page No.93 of the

booklet furnished to the detenu contains the remand report, but the same

was not properly translated to Tamil, the language known the detenue and

hence, the Detention Order passed by the Detaining Authority is vitiated.

5. In this context, it is useful to refer to the judgment of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in 'Powanammal Vs. State of Tamil Nadu' reported in

'(1999) 2 SCC 413'. The Hon'ble Supreme Court, after discussing the

safeguards embodied in Article 22 (5) of the Constitution, observed that the

detenu should be afforded an opportunity of making representation

effectively against the Detention Order and that, the failure to supply every

material is imperative. In the said context, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has

held in Paragraphs 9 and 16 of the said judgment as follows:

“9.However, this Court has maintained a distinction between a document which has been relied upon by the detaining authority in the grounds of detention and a document which finds a mere reference in the grounds of detention. Whereas the non-supply of a copy of the document relied upon in the grounds of detention

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 27/11/2025 06:07:17 pm )

has been held to be fatal to continued detention, the detenue need not show that any prejudice is caused to him. This is because the non-supply of such a document would amount to denial of the right of being communicated the grounds and of being afforded the opportunity of making an effective representation against the order. But it would not be so where the document merely finds a reference in the order of detention or among the grounds thereof. In such a case, the detenue's complaint of non-supply of document has to be supported by prejudice caused to him in making an effective representation. What applies to a document would equally apply to furnishing a translated copy of the document in the language known to and understood by the detenue, should the document be in a different language.

..... 16.For the above reasons, in our view, the non-supply of the Tamil version of the English document, on the facts and in the circumstances, renders her continued detention illegal. We, therefore, direct that the detenuee be set free forthwith unless she is required to be detained in any other case. The appeal is accordingly allowed.”

6. In view of the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and in

view of the aforesaid facts, this Court is of the view that the detention order

is liable to be quashed.

7. In the result, the detention order passed by the 2nd respondent

dated 10.02.2025 in No.72/BCDFGISSSV/2025 is hereby set aside and the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 27/11/2025 06:07:17 pm )

Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed. The detenu viz., Dilip Kumar,

S/o.Janakiraman, male, aged 29 years, is directed to be set at liberty

forthwith unless he is required in connection with any other case.

                                                                                [N.S.K.,J.]       [M.J.R.,J.]
                                                                                           24.11.2025

                     Index: Yes/No
                     Neutral Citation: Yes/No
                     gpa

                     To

1. The Additional Chief Secretary to Government Home, Prohibition and Excise Department Secretariat, Government of Tamil Nadu Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009

2. The Commissioner of Police Greater Chennai

3. The Superintendent of Police Central Prison-II Puzhal, Chennai

4. The Inspector of Police (L & O) S-4, Nanthambakkam Police Station, Chennai

5. The Joint Secretary to Government Public (Law & Order) Fort Saint George, Chennai – 9

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 27/11/2025 06:07:17 pm )

6.The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras.

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J., AND M.JOTHIRAMAN, J.,

gpa

24.11.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 27/11/2025 06:07:17 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter