Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Tvl.R.Sankara Narayanan Industries vs The Deputy State Tax Officer – 2
2025 Latest Caselaw 4160 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4160 Mad
Judgement Date : 19 March, 2025

Madras High Court

Tvl.R.Sankara Narayanan Industries vs The Deputy State Tax Officer – 2 on 19 March, 2025

Author: G.R.Swaminathan
Bench: G.R.Swaminathan
                                                                             W.A.(MD)Nos.667 & 668 of 2022

                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
                                                  DATED : 19.03.2025
                                                           CORAM
                            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
                                                              AND
                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN
                                           W.A(MD)Nos.667 & 668 of 2022
                                                      and
                                         C.M.P(MD)Nos.5663 & 5664 of 2022

                     W.A(MD)No.667 of 2022:

                     Tvl.R.Sankara Narayanan Industries,
                     Represented by its Proprietor
                     R.Sankara Narayanan,
                     No.114, Opposite to RMTC Colony,
                     Mariammankovilpatti,
                     Theni.                                                              ... Appellant /
                                                                                             Petitioner
                                                                Vs.

                     The Deputy State Tax Officer – 2,
                     Theni – 1.                                                          ... Respondent /
                                                                                             Respondent

                     Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside
                     the order of the learned Judge in W.P(MD)No.4380 of 2022 dated
                     28.04.2022 and allow the above said Writ Appeal.


                                     For Appellant        : Mr.A.Chandrasekaran

                                     For Respondent       : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar
                                                            Additional Government Pleader



                     1/7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                ( Uploaded on: 21/04/2025 03:14:08 pm )
                                                                                    W.A.(MD)Nos.667 & 668 of 2022

                     W.A(MD)No.668 of 2022:

                     Tvl.R.Sankara Narayanan Industries,
                     Represented by its Proprietor
                     R.Sankara Narayanan,
                     No.114, Opposite to RMTC Colony,
                     Mariammankovilpatti,
                     Theni.                                                                     ... Appellant /
                                                                                                    Petitioner

                                                                       Vs.

                     The Deputy State Tax Officer – 2,
                     Theni – 1.                                                                 ... Respondent /
                                                                                                    Respondent

                     Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside
                     the order of the learned Judge in W.P(MD)No.4381 of 2022 dated
                     28.04.2022 and allow the above said Writ Appeal.
                                        For Appellant            : Mr.A.Chandrasekaran

                                        For Respondent           : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar
                                                                   Additional Government Pleader

                                                  COMMON JUDGMENT


(Judgment of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan J.)

Heard both sides.

2.The appellant was a dealer in Charcoal and Agarbathies. The

case on hand pertains to the assessment of the dealers under Central

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 21/04/2025 03:14:08 pm ) W.A.(MD)Nos.667 & 668 of 2022

Sales Tax Act, 1956. The assessee had paid tax at 2% by submitting C-

Form.

3.While so on 14.07.2021, the respondent issued notice for the

years 2009-10 and 2010-11 calling upon the assessee / dealer to produce

the 'C' Form declarations. The assessee offered their explanation. They

also attended the personal hearing. The stand of the assessee was that

they were maintaining the accounts only for a period of 6 years and that

therefore they are not in a position to comply with the demand of the

assessing officer.

4.Not satisfied with the explanation given by the assessee, the

assessing officer passed order dated 08.02.2022 denying concessional

rate of 2% and levying higher rate of 4%. Challenging the said

assessment order, the assessee filed W.P(MD)Nos.4380 and 4381 of

2022. The learned single Judge vide order dated 28.04.2022 dismissed

the writ petitions and granted liberty to the assessee to file statutory

appeals. Aggrieved by the same, these writ appeals have been filed.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 21/04/2025 03:14:08 pm ) W.A.(MD)Nos.667 & 668 of 2022

5.The prime contention urged by the learned counsel appearing for

the appellant is that the demand is bared by limitation. He pointed out

that the assessment years are 2009-2010 and 2010-2011. Rule 64(2)(b)

of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Rules, 2007 mandates that the dealer

/ assessee must maintain the books of account and documents for a

period of 6 years from the end of the assessment year. Therefore, the

assessee cannot be faulted for not keeping the photo copies of the C-form

originally submitted by them. The assessee reiterates before us that they

did submit the C-form declaration during the relevant time.

6.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the

assessing officer is right in his submission that there is no limitation

period for making original assessment under Section 22(4) of Tamil

Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 read with Section 9(2) of the Central

Sales Tax Act, 1956. Though a learned Judge of this Court had earlier

held that the original assessment must be made before the deemed

assessment kicks in, there has been a subsequent change in the legal

position. He drew our attention to the order dated 18.09.2024 rendered

by the Hon'ble Division Bench in W.P.Nos.6153, 6156 and 6157 of 2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 21/04/2025 03:14:08 pm ) W.A.(MD)Nos.667 & 668 of 2022

(M/s.Oliva Care Vs The State Tax Offier, Podanur Assessment Circle,

Coimbatore). It was held therein that there is no period of limitation

prescribed for making original assessment under Section 22(4) of Tamil

Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. But the very same Hon'ble Division

Bench had clarified that this power must be exercised within a reasonable

period. The only question that we are called upon to determine is

whether in this case the impugned assessment was made within a

reasonable period. It is obvious that the issue is sought to be reopened

by the Department after a lapse of more than a decade. We do not want

to lay down any hard and fast rule prescribing what would be the

reasonable period. This issue has to be determined with reference to the

facts and circumstances of each case.

7.Coming to the case on hand, we hold that the notice and

assessment under Section 22(4) of Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act,

2006 have not been issued within a reasonable period. Respectfully

applying the Hon'ble Division Bench decision rendered in M/s.Oliva

Care, we hold that the impugned proceedings are hit by limitation. In this

view of the matter, the orders impugned in the writ petitions as well as in

these Writ Appeals are set aside.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 21/04/2025 03:14:08 pm ) W.A.(MD)Nos.667 & 668 of 2022

8.These Writ Appeals are allowed accordingly. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

                                                                     [G.R.S., J.]    [M.J.R., J.]
                                                                              19.03.2025

                     NCC : Yes / No
                     Index : Yes / No
                     Internet : Yes/ No
                     MGA

                     To

                     The Deputy State Tax Officer – 2,
                     Theni – 1.







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                 ( Uploaded on: 21/04/2025 03:14:08 pm )
                                                                W.A.(MD)Nos.667 & 668 of 2022


                                                                    G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.
                                                                                        AND
                                                                            M.JOTHIRAMAN, J.
                                                                                        MGA




                                                      W.A(MD)Nos.667 & 668 of 2022
                                                                                and
                                                   C.M.P(MD)Nos.5663 & 5664 of 2022




                                                                                    19.03.2025






https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 21/04/2025 03:14:08 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter