Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19108 Mad
Judgement Date : 27 September, 2024
W.A.(MD)No.1650 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 27.09.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE VICTORIA GOWRI
W.A.(MD)No.1650 of 2024
and C.M.P(MD)No.12953 of 2024
The Management,
O.265 Thenthiruperai
Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society,
Thenthiruperai,
Tuticorin District
Rep. by its Secretary ... Appellant/Writ Petitioner
vs.
1. The Presiding Officer,
Labour Court,
Tirunelveli.
2.K.Perumal ... Respondents/Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent challenging
the order dated 10.06.202`3 made in W.P.(MD)No.22303 of 2015.
For Appellant : Mr.SRA Ramachandran
Additional Government Pleader
For R2 : Mr.V.Rajiv Rufus
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.(MD)No.1650 of 2024
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.)
The Co-operative Society is on appeal. Challenge is to the order of the writ
court directing payment of salary for the period during which the 2nd respondent
was not allowed to work by the appellant society and the central cooperative bank
to which he was deputed.
2. The employee has approached the Labour Court. The Labour Court,
upon consideration of the evidence, came to the conclusion that the employee was
not allowed to work by the appellant society and the central co-operative bank to
which he was deputed. The writ court has also affirmed the conclusion of the
Labour Court. The writ court has also referred to the proceedings, particularly, the
correspondence between the two institutions namely, the appellant society and the
management of the Tuticorin District Central Cooperative Bank Limited to come
to the conclusion that the employee remained out of employment only because
of inaction on the part of the two institutions.
3. In view of the said conclusion, we do not think we can test the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
correctness of the same, particularly, in an appeal filed against the order passed
under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Once it is found that the employee
was not allowed to work, the liability to pay the salary attaches to the employer
automatically. Therefore,we see no reason to interfere with the order of the
learned single Judge. The Writ Appeal fails and the same is dismissed. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
(R.S.M., J.) (L.V.G., J.)
27.09.2024
NCC : Yes/No
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
CM
To
The Presiding Officer,
Labour Court,
Tirunelveli.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
and L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
CM
and
27.09.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!