Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Executive Officer vs B.Sivaraman
2023 Latest Caselaw 12791 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 12791 Mad
Judgement Date : 20 September, 2023

Madras High Court
The Executive Officer vs B.Sivaraman on 20 September, 2023
                                                                      W.A.No.2980 of 2021



                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                             DATED:    20.09.2023

                                                   CORAM :

                           THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE
                                                      AND
                                    THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU


                                              W.A.No.2980 of 2021

                     The Executive Officer,
                     Arulmigu Selva Vinayagar & Kothandaramar Temple,
                     West Tambaram,
                     Chennai-600 045.                                 .. Appellant

                                                       Vs

                     1.B.Sivaraman

                     2.B.Krishnamurthi

                     3.B.Thyagarajan

                     4.The Commissioner,
                       Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Dept.,
                       Nungambakkam,
                       Chennai-600 034.

                     5.The Assistant Commissioner,
                       Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Dept.,
                       Nungambakkam,
                       Chennai-600 034.




                     ___________
                     Page 1 of 8


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                              W.A.No.2980 of 2021



                     6.The Special Revenue District Officer,
                       Land Acquisition,
                       National Highways Schemes,
                       Kanchipuram and Tiruvallur Districts,
                       Kanchipuram.                                            .. Respondents


                     Prayer : Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the
                     order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.15344 of 2014
                     dated 19.07.2021 and 12.08.2021.

                                     For the Appellant       : Mr.J.Chandran Sunder Sashikumar
                                                               for Mr.S.Adaikkappan   @   Sithirai
                                                               Anandam
                                     For the Respondents     : Mr.R.Rajarajan
                                                               for respondent Nos.1 to 3

                                                             : Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan
                                                               Spl. Govt. Pleader (HR & CE)
                                                               for respondent Nos.4 and 5

                                                               Mr.P.Muthukumar
                                                               State Government Pleader
                                                               for respondent No.6

                                                       JUDGMENT

(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

We have heard Mr.J.Chandran Sunder Sashikumar, learned

counsel for the appellant; Mr.R.Rajarajan, learned counsel for

respondents 1 to 3; Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan, learned Special

Government Pleader (HR & CE) for respondents 4 and 5; and,

___________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.2980 of 2021

Mr.P.Muthukumar, learned State Government Pleader for respondent

No.6.

2. The order passed by the learned Single Judge is assailed.

3. The present respondents 1, 2 and 3 had filed writ petition

bearing W.P.No.15344 of 2014 seeking directions against the fourth

respondent in the writ petition to pay the compensation amount of

Rs.1,33,45,948/- to the original petitioners in respect of the

ownership of the property situated at No.55, G.S.T. Road, Survey

No.5, Irumpuliyur Village, Tambaram Taluk. The petitioners also

challenged the order appointing a Fit Person.

4. The learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petition

accepting that the HR & CE Department has no claim over the

property in question and the consideration for acquisition is to be

handed over to the original petitioners. The learned Single Judge

observed that no-objection has been conveyed by the Assistant

Commissioner, HR & CE Department.

___________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.2980 of 2021

5. In fact, the stand of the HR & CE Department is not clear.

The Assistant Commissioner, HR & CE Department, had requested

the Highways Authority to pay the compensation to the Fit Person

appointed for the temple and not to pay compensation to the

individuals and, on the second breath, before the learned Single

Judge, has contended otherwise. The learned Single Judge has also

commented upon the stand of the HR & CE Department.

6. It appears that the issue with regard to the title, namely

whether the private persons are the owners or the temple, is the

subject matter of dispute.

7. Section 3-H(4) of the National Highways Act, 1956 provides

that if any dispute arises as to the apportionment of the amount or

any part thereof or to any person to whom the same or any part

thereof is payable, the competent authority shall refer the dispute to

the decision of the Principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction within

the limits of whose jurisdiction the land is situated.

___________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.2980 of 2021

8. The dispute exists between the parties as to whether the

temple is the owner of the property or the private individuals are the

owners of the property.

9. In the light of that, we set aside the order of the learned

Single Judge and direct the National Highways Authority to adopt

the procedure under Section 3-H(4) of the Act. As the Assistant

Commissioner, HR & CE Department has already raised a dispute

and requested that the compensation should be paid to the Fit

Person and not to any individuals, whereas the writ petitioners/

individuals have claimed the compensation amount on the ground

that they are owners of the property, the dispute of title exists. In

view of that, it would be appropriate to resort to the recourse

provided under Section 3-H(4) of the Act.

10. The authority concerned shall refer the dispute to the

concerned Principal Court of civil jurisdiction, preferably within one

month from today. The parties shall appear before the Principal

___________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.2980 of 2021

Court of civil jurisdiction, where the matter is being referred to for

adjudication, on 1.11.2023. In view of the fact that the date is

already given by this court, it will not be necessary for the civil court

to issue fresh notices. The civil court shall endeavour to decide the

said suit/dispute expeditiously.

11. The amount with the DRO/Land Acquisition Officer shall be

remitted to the court where the dispute is referred to. The Court,

where the dispute is referred to, shall invest the said amount in a

fixed deposit till the disposal of the suit/dispute. The Principal

District Judge shall thereafter take steps for payment of the amount

in tune with the judgment that may be delivered by the civil court.

The writ appeal is disposed of accordingly. There will be no

order as to costs. Consequently, C.M.P.No.20257 of 2021 is closed.

                                                         (S.V.G., CJ.)                 (P.D.A., J.)
                                                                         20.09.2023
                     Index            :            Yes/No
                     Neutral Citation :            Yes/No
                     sasi

                     ___________



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.2980 of 2021

To

1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Dept., Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034.

2.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Dept., Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034.

3.The Special Revenue District Officer, Land Acquisition, National Highways Schemes, Kanchipuram and Tiruvallur Districts, Kanchipuram.

___________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.2980 of 2021

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND P.D.AUDIKESAVALU,J.

(sasi)

W.A.No.2980 of 2021

20.09.2023

___________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter