Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kanniyappan vs S.Prabha
2023 Latest Caselaw 12602 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 12602 Mad
Judgement Date : 15 September, 2023

Madras High Court
Kanniyappan vs S.Prabha on 15 September, 2023
                                                                    TR.C.M.P.(MD) No.413 of 2023

                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED : 15.09.2023

                                                       CORAM

                     THE HO'BLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI

                                            TR.C.M.P.(MD) No.413 of 2023
                                                        and
                                             C.M.P.(MD) No.8588 of 2023

                    1.Kanniyappan

                    2.Vallinayagi                                              ... Petitioners

                                                         Vs.
                    1.S.Prabha

                    2.P.K.Parthasarathy                                        ... Respondents

                    Prayer:- This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24
                    of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to withdraw D.V.C.No.18 of 2023
                    on the file of the Additional Mahila Court, Pudukottai and transfer the
                    same to the file of the Additional Mahila Court, Trichy.


                                   For Petitioners   : Mr.T.Lenin Kumar

                                   For R1            : Mr.R.Maheswaran


                                                     ORDER

This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the

petitioners for transfer of D.V.C.No.18 of 2023 from the file of the

_____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

TR.C.M.P.(MD) No.413 of 2023

Additional Mahila Court, Pudukottai to the file of the Additional Mahila

Court, Trichy.

2. The respondents are the wife and husband. The petitioners are

the parents-in-law of the first respondent and the parents of the second

respondent. The marriage was solemnized between the respondents on

28.01.2007 and out of wedlock, a male child and a female child were

born. Due to the some matrimonial discord, the respondents are living

separately.

3. Thereafter, the second respondent/husband filed H.M.O.P.No.

250 of 2020 before the Family Court, Dindigul for dissolution of marriage

solemnized between the respondents on 28.01.2007. Meantime, the first

respondent/wife filed H.M.O.P.No.22 of 2021 before the Principal Sub

Court, Pudukottai for restitution of conjugal rights

4. Thereafter, the first respondent/wife filed Tr.C.M.P.(MD) No.10

of 2021 before this Court for transfer of H.M.O.P.No.250 of 2020 from

the Family Court, Dindigul to the Principal Sub Court, Pudukottai. Vide

order dated 18.06.2021, H.M.O.P.No.250 of 2020 was directed to be

_____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

TR.C.M.P.(MD) No.413 of 2023

transferred to an intermediate place i.e. the Family Court, Trichy and was

re-numbered as H.M.O.P.No.345 of 2021.

5. Thereafter, for joint trial, the second respondent/husband filed

Tr.C.M.P.(MD) No.277 of 2021 before this Court for transfer of

H.M.O.P.No.22 of 2021 filed by the first respondent/wife before the

Principal Sub Court, Pudukottai for restitution of conjugal rights to the

Family Court, Trichy which was allowed and the H.M.O.P. filed by the

first respondent/wife was transferred to the Family Court, Trichy.

6. Subsequently, the first respondent/wife filed G.W.O.P.No.121 of

2021 before the Principal District Court, Dindigul to appoint her as legal

guardian of the minor children and also to direct the second

respondent/husband to hand over the minor children to the first

respondent/wife. To avoid multiplicity of Judgments, the second

respondent/husband again filed Tr.C.M.P.(MD) No.176 of 2022 before

this Court for transfer of G.W.O.P. from Principal District Court,

Dindigul to the Family Court, Trichy where already both H.M.O.P are

pending. The Tr.C.M.P. was allowed and G.W.O.P. was transferred to the

Family Court, Trichy and renumbered as G.W.O.P.No.121 of 2021.

_____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

TR.C.M.P.(MD) No.413 of 2023

7. Now, the first respondent/wife filed D.V.C.No.18 of 2023 before

the Additional Mahila Court, Pudukottai against the second

respondent/husband and the petitioners herein who are her parents-in-law.

The petitioners filed the present Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition for

transfer of D.V.C.No.18 of 2023 from the Additional Mahila Court,

Pudukottai to the Additional Mahila Court, Trichy.

8. It is submitted that it is very difficult for the petitioners to attend

the hearing at Pudukottai and H.M.O.Ps. filed by the first and second

respondents respectively and the G.W.O.P. filed by the first

respondent/wife are pending before the Family Court, Trichy and if the

D.V.C. proceedings is allowed to go ahead at Pudukottai, all parties

should run from pillar to post to attend the case at Trichy on one day and

attend the case at Pudukottai on the other day.

9. It is further submitted that the first respondent’s brother has made

a life threatening to the petitioners at Pudukottai and therefore, they

lodged a complaint before the Inspector of Police, Vadamadurai and same

was registered in Crime No.108 of 2021 for the offence punishable under

Sections 294(b) and 506(i) of the Indian Penal Code. It is further

_____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

TR.C.M.P.(MD) No.413 of 2023

submitted that if the petitioners go to Pudukottai, the first respondent

along with his family members will try to eliminate them.

10. It is further submitted that the petitioners are senior citizens and

they crossed the age of 70 years and cannot travel such a long distance in

a single day. It is further submitted that in order to avoid multiplicity of

Judgments, D.V.C. may transferred from the file of the Additional Mahila

Court, Pudukottai to the Additional Mahila Court, Trichy.

11. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned

counsel for the first respondent.

12. Already two H.M.O.Ps. and one G.W.O.P. are pending before

the Family Court, Trichy. If D.V.C. proceedings are permitted to be

continued at Pudukottai, it will be inconvenient for both parties to attend

Court proceedings at two different places. Therefore, considering the age

of the petitioners and considering the above facts and circumstances of

the case, D.V.C.No.18 of 2023 is directed to be transferred from the file

of the Additional Mahila Court, Pudukottai to the file of the Additional

Mahila Court, Trichy.

_____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

TR.C.M.P.(MD) No.413 of 2023

13. Accordingly, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is

allowed. No cost. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is

closed.

15.09.2023 NCC : Yes / No Internet: Yes/No Index: Yes/ No jen

To

1.The Judge, Additional Mahila Court, Pudukottai.

2.The Judge, Additional Mahila Court, Trichy.

_____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

TR.C.M.P.(MD) No.413 of 2023

K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.

jen

TR.C.M.P.(MD) No.413 of 2023 and C.M.P.(MD) No.8588 of 2023

15.09.2023

_____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter