Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6915 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 June, 2023
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.168 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Date : 23.06.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.168 of 2019
and
Crl.M.P(MD) 2548 of 2019
Maruthavanan ... Revision Petitioner/Appellant / Accused
vs.
N.Thirumalaikumar ... Revision Respondent/ Respondent Complainant
PRAYER : This Criminal Revision has been filed under Section 397 r/w
401 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records from the lower court and to duly set
aside the order passed by the learned Additional District Court,
Srivillipudhur, Virudhunagar District in his C.A. No 120 of 2014 dated
02.03.2019 in confirming the judgment of the Judicial Magistrate
Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District in C.C.No.198 of 2013 dated
02.09.2014.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Prabhu
For Respondent : Mr.A.Sivaji
1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.168 of 2019
ORDER
This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed as against the
Judgment passed by the learned Additional District Court, Srivillipudhur,
Virudhunagar District in C.A.No.120 of 2014 dated 02.03.2019 by
confirming the order of the learned Judicial Magistrate Rajapalayam,
Virudhunagar District in C.C.No.198 of 2013 dated 02.09.2014.
2.The petitioner is an accused in the complaint lodged by the
respondent for the offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I. Act.
3.The crux of the complaint is that the petitioner borrowed a sum
of Rs.5,44,000/- from the respondent on 10.10.2012 and he also
promised to repay the said amount within a period of four months. On
repeated request in order to return the money, the petitioner has issued
two cheques dated 22.02.2013 for a sum of Rs.2,72,000/- each. Both the
cheques were presented for collection. However, both cheques were
returned dishonored for the reason 'funds insufficient'. After causing
statutory notice, the respondent lodged a complaint.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.(MD)No.168 of 2019
4.On the side of the respondent, he had examined P.W.1 and P.W.2
and marked Ex.P.1 to Ex.P.9. On the side of the accused, he had
examined D.W.1 and D.W.2 and marked Ex.D.1 to Ex.D.3.
5.On perusal of the oral and documentary evidence, the trial Court
found the petitioner guilty for the offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act
and sentenced him to undergo two years Simple Imprisonment and to pay
a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to undergo 6 months Simple Imprisonment.
Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has preferred an appeal in
C.A.No.120 of 2014 before the learned Additional District Court,
Srivillipudhur, Virudhunagar District and the Appellate Court also
dismissed the appeal on 02.03.2019 and confirming the order of
conviction and sentence imposed by the trial Court. Hence, the present
revision.
6.At the time of suspending the sentence of the petitioner, the
petitioner was directed to deposit a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- to the credit of
C.C.No.198 of 2013 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate
Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District. Subsequently, he was directed to
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.(MD)No.168 of 2019
deposit the remaining cheque amount. Both directions were duly
complied with and the petitioner deposited a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- to the
credit of C.C.No.198 of 2013 on the file of the learned Judicial
Magistrate Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District, on 06.05.2019 and a sum
of Rs.3,94,000/- was deposited in C.C.No.198 of 2013 before the trial
Court on 01.07.2019.
7.Now the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he
has no objection to withdraw the said amount by the respondent.
8.The learned counsel for the respondent also satisfied with the
cheque amount, which was already deposited by the petitioner.
9.In view of the above, the Judgment made in C.A.No.120 of 2014,
dated 26.09.2018 on the file of the learned Additional District Court,
Srivillipudhur, Virudhunagar District, confirming the order made in
C.C.No.198 of 2013, dated 02.09.2014 on the file of the Judicial
Magistrate No.I, Tiruchirappalli is set aside.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.(MD)No.168 of 2019
10.Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is allowed. The
petitioner/accused is acquitted. Bail bond if any executed by the
petitioner/accused shall stand cancelled and a fine amount if paid is
ordered to be refunded to the petitioner/accused forthwith. Consequently
connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
11.The respondent is permitted to withdraw the amount, which was
deposited by the petitioner by way of proper application before the trial
Court. It is also made clear that the trial Court is directed to permit the
respondent to withdraw the amount without ordering notice to the
petitioner herein.
23.06.2023
sji NCC : Yes/No Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No To
1.The Additional District Court, Srivillipudhur, Virudhunagar District.
2.The Judicial Magistrate Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District.
3.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.(MD)No.168 of 2019
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN , J.
sji
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.168 of 2019
23.06.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!