Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8913 Mad
Judgement Date : 24 July, 2023
W.A.No.1818 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 24.07.2023
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
W.A.No.1818 of 2023
The Management,
Sanmina SCI India Private Limited,
OZ-1, SIPCOT Hi-Tech SEZ,
Oragadam, Sriperumbudur Taluk,
Kancheepuram District – 602 105
rep. by its HR Director &
Authorised Signatory R.Kumar .. Appellant
Vs
S.Loganathan .. Respondent
Prayer: Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to set aside the
order dated 25.4.2023 passed in W.M.P.No.5620 of 2022 in
W.P.No.25939 of 2021 by the learned Single Judge.
For the Appellant : Mr.A.L.Somayaji
Senior Counsel
for Mr.C.Manohar Gupta
__________
Page 1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.1818 of 2023
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
We have heard Mr.A.L.Somayaji, learned Senior Counsel
for the appellant.
2. The appellant is challenging the order passed by the
learned Single Judge in W.M.P.No.5620 of 2022 in W.P.No.25939
of 2021, dated 25.4.2023.
3. Learned Senior Counsel for the appellant submits that
without considering the prima facie case, the learned Single Judge
has invoked Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The
approval application has not been accepted by the Industrial
Tribunal only on the ground that the prior permission was not
obtained and the application for approval was filed on the day of the
dismissal of the employee. The legal issue is pending consideration
before the learned Single Judge. It was incumbent upon the learned
Single Judge to look into the prima facie case before passing the
__________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.1818 of 2023
order under Section 17-B of the Act.
4. We have considered the submissions canvassed by learned
Senior Counsel for the appellant.
5. There is no dispute that as on date the application for
approval of the dismissal has not been accepted. The result is
reinstatement. The issue on merits is pending consideration before
the learned Single Judge. As such, we would not like to comment
on the merits of the matter. Section 17-B of the Act does not admit
of any other interpretation. The learned Single Judge exercised the
discretion in a plausible manner. As such, we are not inclined to
interfere with the order passed by the learned Single Judge.
6. In the result, the writ appeal is disposed of. There will be
no order as to costs. Consequently, C.M.P.No.16015 of 2023 is
closed.
__________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.1818 of 2023
7. Learned Senior Counsel for the appellant submits that the
writ petition be directed to be disposed of expeditiously.
8. The appellant may make a request to the learned Single
Judge, which would be considered by the learned Single Judge
considering the convenience of the learned Single Judge.
(S.V.G., CJ.) (P.D.A., J.)
24.07.2023
Index : Yes/No
Neutral Citation : Yes/No
sasi
__________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.1818 of 2023
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND P.D.AUDIKESAVALU,J.
(sasi)
W.A.No.1818 of 2023
24.07.2023
__________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!