Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Karunanidhi Saroja vs State Represented By
2022 Latest Caselaw 13501 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 13501 Mad
Judgement Date : 28 July, 2022

Madras High Court
Karunanidhi Saroja vs State Represented By on 28 July, 2022
                                                                     Crl.A.Nos.345 of 2017 etc batch

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                     DATED : 28.07.2022

                                                            CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN

                      Criminal Appeal Nos.345, 352 to 356, 359, 361, 363 to 368, 372, 373 &
                                        398 to 400 of 2017 and Crl.M.Ps

                     Crl.A.No.345 of 2017

                     Karunanidhi Saroja                                             .. Appellant
                                                        /versus/

                     State Represented by:
                     The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
                     Economic Offences Wing-II,
                     Salem District.                                               .. Respondent


                                   Criminal Appeal has been filed under Section 374 of Criminal
                     Procedure Code r/w. 11 of the TNPID Act, praying to set aside the
                     judgment passed in C.C.No.2 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the
                     Special Judge under TNPID Act, Coimbatore dated 19.06.2017


                                            For Appellant      : M/s.S.Doraisamy

                                            For Respondent     : Mr.R.Kishore Kumar
                                                               Government Advocate (Crl.Side)




                     Page 1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                       Crl.A.Nos.345 of 2017 etc batch


                                                 COMMON JUDGMENT

                                  The learned counsel for the appellants without adverting to the

                     merits of the case has come forward to deposit the entire principal

                     amount claimed by the complainant and seek compounding of the

                     offence. However some of the depositors are not inclined to receive the

                     principal amount but they are insisting for interest, which according to

                     them is 15% per annum as promised by the finance company.



                                  2. The learned counsel for the appellants circulated the order of

                     this Court passed in W.P.No.13472 of 2019 dated 05.08.2019, wherein,

                     this Court has passed the following order:

                                               “2.There is already a sum of
                                    Rs.1,00,00,000/- which is available by way of
                                    deposit and this amount shall be disbursed to
                                    the depositors. Simultaneously, steps shall be
                                    taken to bring the properties for sale and the
                                    sale proceeds shall be used to settle the entire
                                    amount to all the depositors.”



                                  3. It is submitted by the appellants that due to the interim order

                     Page 2/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                      Crl.A.Nos.345 of 2017 etc batch

                     passed by this Court, the balance sum of Rs.3,09,35,925/- has been

                     deposited. Hence, prayer for compounding the offence by invoking

                     Section 5A of the TNPID Act. This plea though accepted by many of the

                     depositors, who are parties in this batch of cases, not acceptable to some

                     of the depositors.



                                  4. In the said circumstances, this Court is of the view that the

                     appeals shall be remitted back to the Special Court to record

                     compounding of the offence, wherever the investors are ready to accept

                     the principal amount. For the remaining depositors retry the case and

                     decide whether offence under this Act is attracted against the accused and

                     be dealt accordingly.



                                  5. This Court takes note of the fact that there are materials to

                     show that the prosecution has been launched against some of the sleeping

                     partners and retired partners of the firm and their role in collection of

                     deposit has not been clearly made out by the prosecution during the trial.

                                  6. Hence, the order of the Court below is set aside. The case is



                     Page 3/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                    Crl.A.Nos.345 of 2017 etc batch

                     remanded back for retrial. The Court below shall take note of the fact that

                     the amount collected has already been deposited and most of the investors

                     are ready to compound the offence.



                                  7. Meanwhile the money deposited by the accused persons

                     shall be invested in any one of the Nationalized banks to accrue interest.

                     The fine amount if collected, shall be refunded to the accused persons,

                     subject to the out come of the trial.



                                  8. Accordingly, these Criminal Appeals are allowed and the

                     matter is remanded back for retrial. Consequently, the connected

                     Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.



                                                                                      28.07.2022

                     Index : yes/no
                     Internet:yes/no
                     Speaking order/ Non speaking order

                     rpl

                     To



                     Page 4/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                               Crl.A.Nos.345 of 2017 etc batch

                     1. The Special Judge under TNPID Act, Coimbatore.

                     2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
                     Economic Offences Wing-II,
                     Salem District.

                     3.The Public Prosecutor,
                     High Court, Madras.




                                                              Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.

Page 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.A.Nos.345 of 2017 etc batch

rpl

Crl.A.No.345 of 2017 etc batch

28.07.2022

Page 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter