Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 18102 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 December, 2022
TR.CMP(MD)No.661 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 09.12.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
TR.CMP(MD)No.661 of 2022
and
CMP(MD)No.10557 of 2022
Shyamala ... Petitioner
Vs
Karumanikandan ... Respondent
Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed
under Section 24 of C.P.C, to withdraw HMOP.No.1 of
2020 pending before the Subordinate Judge, Pazhani,
Camp Court at Kodaikanal and to transfer the same to
the file of the Family Court, Madurai.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.A.Dhana Aravindha Balaji
For Respondent : Mr.I.Sam Jeyam
ORDER
This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is
filed seeking transfer of the case in HMOP.No.1 of 2020
from Sub Court, Pazhani, Camp Court at Kodaikanal to
Family Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.CMP(MD)No.661 of 2022
2.The marriage between the petitioner and the
respondent was solemnized on 08.06.2014. Due to
misunderstanding between them, the respondent has filed
a petition in HMOP.No.1 of 2020 before the learned Sub
Judge, Pazhani, Camp Court at Kodaikanal seeking
divorce, which is sought to be transferred to the
Family Court, Madurai by the petitioner on the ground
that she is residing in Madurai along with her aged
mother, she is having a child of tender age and she
finds it difficult to appear before the Court at
Kodaikanal.
3.The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits
that the petitioner is dependant of her aged mother,
she is having a child of five years old and the
respondent has filed the above petition only to harass
the petitioner.
4.The learned Counsel for the respondent opposed
this petition.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.CMP(MD)No.661 of 2022
5.The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of
Amitha Shah vs- Virendar Lal Shah, reported
(2003)10 SCC 609 has held that the convenience of the
wife and more so of the child must be taken into
account while deciding the petition for transfer and in
the case of Rajani Kishor Paradeshi Vs Kishor Babulal
Paradeshi reported in (2005) 12 SCC 237, the Hon'ble
Apex Court has held that in such type of transfer
petitions, the convenience of the wife is to be
preferred over the convenience of the husband.
6.This Court being satisfied with the reasons
stated in the affidavit filed in support of this
petition and also taking into consideration that the
convenience of wife is to be taken into consideration
at the time of considering transfer petitions as held
by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the judgments cited
supra, is inclined to allow the present petition.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.CMP(MD)No.661 of 2022
7.Accordingly, this transfer civil miscellaneous
petition stands allowed with the following directions:
(i) The case in HMOP.No.1 of 2020 on the
file of the Sub Judge, Pazhani, Camp Court at
Kodaikanal is transferred to the Family Court,
Madurai.
(ii)The learned Sub Judge, Pazhani, Camp
Court at Kodaikanal is directed to send the
above case records within a period of fifteen
days from the date of receipt of a copy of this
order to the learned Judge, Family Court,
Madurai, who in turn, on receipt of the case,
shall dispose of it as expeditiously as
possible. No costs. Consequently, connected
miscellaneous petition stands closed.
09.12.2022
dsk
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.CMP(MD)No.661 of 2022
To
1.The Judge, Family Court, Madurai.
2.The Sub Judge, Pazhani.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.CMP(MD)No.661 of 2022
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
dsk
TR.CMP(MD)No.661 of 2022
09.12.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!