Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Deshraj @ Bablu vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2023 Latest Caselaw 6317 MP

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6317 MP
Judgement Date : 19 April, 2023

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Deshraj @ Bablu vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 April, 2023
Author: Deepak Kumar Agarwal
                                                      1
                           IN    THE     HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                               AT GWALIOR
                                                   BEFORE
                                HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DEEPAK KUMAR AGARWAL
                                             ON THE 19 th OF APRIL, 2023
                                         CRIMINAL REVISION No. 383 of 2015

                          BETWEEN:-
                          1.    DESHRAJ @ BABLU S/O SHRI BHANVAR SINGH
                                RAJPUT, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/O GRAM
                                JHIKNI TEHSIL KUMBHRAJ GUNA (MADHYA
                                PRADESH)

                          2.    RAMBANA S/O POORAN SINGH, AGED ABOUT 25
                                YEAR S , R/O GRAM JHIKNI TEH. KUMBHRAJ
                                GUNA (MADHYA PRADESH)

                          3.    ANAR SINGH S/O BHAWAR SINGH, AGED ABOUT
                                38 YEARS, R/O GRAM JHIKNI TEH. KUMBHRAJ
                                GUNA (MADHYA PRADESH)

                          4.    PRATAP SINGH S/O MOTI SINGH, AGED ABOUT 39
                                YEARS, R/O GRAM JHIKNI TEH. KUMBHRAJ
                                GUNA (MADHYA PRADESH)

                          5.    NIRANJAN SINGH S/O POORAN SINGH, AGED
                                ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O GRAM JHIKNI TEH.
                                KUMBHRAJ GUNA (MADHYA PRADESH)

                          6.    HUKUM SINGH S/O BHAWAR SINGH, AGED
                                ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O GRAM JHIKNI TEH.
                                KUMBHRAJ GUNA (MADHYA PRADESH)

                          7.    BAIJNATH SINGH S/O MOTI SINGH, AGED ABOUT
                                58 YEARS, R/O GRAM JHIKNI TEH. KUMBHRAJ
                                GUNA (MADHYA PRADESH)

                          8.    RAMBABU S/O BAIJNATH SINGH, AGED ABOUT 25
                                YEARS, R/O GRAM JHIKNI TEH. KUMBHRAJ
                                GUNA (MADHYA PRADESH)

                          9.    NABAL SINGH S/O MOTI SINGH, AGED ABOUT 43
                                YEAR S , R/O GRAM JHIKNI TEH. KUMBHRAJ
                                GUNA (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                                                             .....PETITIONERS
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: ADNAN HUSAIN
ANSARI
Signing time: 4/19/2023
6:34:54 PM
                                                              2
                          (NONE FOR THE PETITIONERS)

                          AND
                          THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AARKSHI KENDRA
                          KUMBHRAJ DISTRICT GUNA (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                                                                       .....RESPONDENT
                          (BY SHRI PRAMOD PACHOURI - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR)

                                Th is revision coming on for hearing this day, th e court passed the
                          following:
                                                               ORDER

Today, no one has appeared on behalf of petitioners. This criminal revision is pending since 2015.

Case diary is perused.

This criminal revision under Section 397 read with Section 401 of CrPC has been filed by applicants against the judgment dated 23.04.2015 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Chachoda, District Guna in Criminal Appeal No.220 of 2014 confirming the judgment dated 08.07.2014 passed by the Court of JMFC in Criminal Case No.12/2012, whereby the applicants have been convicted under Section 323/34 of IPC and sentenced to undergo 3-3 months' RI with fine of Rs.200-200/- and for offence under Section 324/34 of IPC sentenced to undergo 1-1 years' RI with fine of Rs.300-300/- and for offence under Section 325/34 of IPC and sentenced to undergo 2-2 years' RI with fine of Rs.500-500/- with default stipulations.

Having perused the record and gone through the impugned judgments passed by learned trial Court as well as lower appellate Court, this Court is of the considered opinion that no illegality has been committed by the Court below in passing the impugned judgments.

The Apex Court in the case of Duli Chand vs. Delhi Administration Signature Not Verified Signed by: ADNAN HUSAIN ANSARI Signing time: 4/19/2023 6:34:54 PM

as reported in (1975) 4 SCC 649, has held that the jurisdiction of the High Court in a criminal revision is severely restricted and it cannot embark upon a re-appreciation of evidence. The said judgment has been followed by the Apex Court in the case of State of Maharashtra vs. Jagmohan Singh Kuldip Singh Anand and others as reported in (2004) 7 SCC 659.

Accordingly, present criminal revision stands dismissed.

(DEEPAK KUMAR AGARWAL) JUDGE Adnan

Signature Not Verified Signed by: ADNAN HUSAIN ANSARI Signing time: 4/19/2023 6:34:54 PM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter