Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12111 MP
Judgement Date : 12 September, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUBODH ABHYANKAR
ON THE 12th OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
WRIT PETITION No. 20671 of 2022
BETWEEN:-
SUNIL SHRIVASTAVA S/O SHRI SIYASARAM
SHRIVASTAVA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: SERVICE 59, VANDANA NAGAR
MAIN, INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI L.C. PATNE, ADVOCATE)
AND
1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF NRED AND ENVIRONMENT
VALLABH BHAWAN MANTRALAYA BHOPAL
(MADHYA PRADESH)
2. THE M.P. POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,
THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN E 5 ARERA COLONY,
PARYAVARAN PARISAR, DISTRICT BHOPAL
(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI S.R. SAXENA, DY. ADVOCATE GENERAL)
This petition coming on for admission/orders this day, the court passed
the following:
ORDER
In the instant petition, a challenge has been made to the order of compulsory retirement under the provisions of Rule 42(1)(b) of the MP Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue raised in the present case that there is no provision for compulsory retirement in the Signature Not Verified Signed by: KHEMRAJ JOSHI Signing time: 12-09-2022 18:19:11
establishment of MP Pollution Control Board has already been answered by the co-ordinate bench of this Court at Principal Seat in WP No.12230/2022 (Anoop Kumar Shrivastava Vs. State of MP and Ors).
A copy of the said judgment was supplied to the learned counsel for the respondent to examine the same and to make submission before this court.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the judgment passed by the co-ordinate bench of this Court in the case of Anoop (supra) covers the issue involved in the present case also and the petition may be disposed off in terms of the said order.
The operative part of the order passed in the said case reads as under :- "Thus, in the considered view of this Court, the order impugned dated 19.05.2022 (Annexure P/1) deserves to be and is accordingly quashed. The petitioner shall be reinstated back in service, if relieved pursuant to impugned order, will all consequential benefits. However, this order will not come in a way of respondent/Board to proceed afresh if so advised while taking recourse to the other statutory provisions. Accordingly, the petition stands allowed to the extent indicated hereinabove."
In view of the aforesaid, the present petition also stands disposed off with a direction that the order passed in the case of Anoop (supra) shall apply mutatis mutandis in the present case also.
(SUBODH ABHYANKAR) JUDGE krjoshi
Signature Not Verified Signed by: KHEMRAJ JOSHI Signing time: 12-09-2022 18:19:11
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!