Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M.K.Rajan vs The State Transport Authority
2024 Latest Caselaw 15642 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15642 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 June, 2024

Kerala High Court

M.K.Rajan vs The State Transport Authority on 6 June, 2024

Author: N.Nagaresh

Bench: N.Nagaresh

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                        PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
THURSDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 16TH JYAISHTA, 1946
                 WP(C) NO. 1960 OF 2024
PETITIONER:

         M.K.RAJAN,
         AGED 70 YEARS,
         TC 20/1114(1), S/O KUNJIRAMAN,
         KARAMANA PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
         (PRESIDENT, ALL INDIA AUTO CONSULTANCY WORKERS
         ASSOCIATION, REGNO:TVM/TC/412/2018),
         PIN - 695002.

         BY ADV. K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR


RESPONDENTS:

    1    THE STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,
         REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY,
         TRANS BHAVAN, VAZHUTHACAUD,
         THRIUVANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001.
    2    THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER,
         TRANS BHAVAN, VAZHUTHACAUD,
         THRIUVANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001.

         BY ADV.SRI.V.S.SREEJITH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP         FOR
ADMISSION ON 06.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME         DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C) No.1960/2024
                                :2:




                         JUDGMENT

Dated this the 6th day of June, 2024

The petitioner is the President of All India Auto

Consultancy Workers Association having registration

No.TVM/TC/412/2018. The members of the Association

are person authorised by the owners of the vehicle having

interstate permits, which is to be allowed and issued by the

State Transport Authority.

2. As part of the transportation of goods, the

Government of Kerala have entered into agreement with

the neighboring States Tamil Nadu and Karnataka, to

issue countersignature for 500 goods carriages in respect

of permits issued by the State Transport Authority,

Karnataka as well as State Transport Authority, Tamil

Nadu, enabling to operate in the State of Kerala by way of

extension of the validity of the permit. For operating those

vehicles in this State, the tax is also prescribed at ₹3,000/-

per year. The countersignature will become invalid if the

permit holder failed to remit the said amount for the State

of Kerala.

3. After obtaining permit from the State Transport

Authority, Karnataka as well as State Transport Authority,

Tamil Nadu, the permit holders file application before the

1st respondent for countersignature/extension of validity of

the permit by extending the facility as stated above. But,

the 1st respondent without verifying the existing vacancies

and granting the same, direct the applicant to approach

the State Transport Authority, Tamil Nadu and State

Transport Authority, Karnataka and obtain necessary

permission from them for such facility, which is absolutely

unnecessary improper and without justification.

4. The petitioner's Association, which is a

registered Association approved and accepted by the

Government filed a detailed representation pointing out the

difficulty and delay in issuing the extension of validity of

permit, because of the unnecessary and arbitrary

procedure requesting the 1st respondent to pass necessary

orders of procedure enabling to issue extension of validity

of permit to the applicant depending upon the existing

vacancies. Though Ext.P2 representation was filed for the

consideration of the respondents, the same has not been

considered so far. Hence, the petitioner has filed this writ

petition.

5. Government Pleader entered appearance and

resisted the writ petition. Subject to the conditions of the

reciprocal agreement, the total number of goods, vehicles

for operation on the interstate route between the state of

Kerala and Karnataka on single point tax shall be fixed at

5,000 numbers of such permits issued in each State shall

not exceed 5,000 numbers. There is no sealing on number

of permits where double point tax is applicable.

6. The quota of such Goods Vehicle Permits of

each State are to be counter signed by the other State in

accordance with the proviso to sub-Section (4) of Section

88 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Central Act 59 of 1988)

shall be 5,000.

7. The Goods Carriages permit holders plying their

vehicles in the reciprocating State with valid counter

signature shall in addition to the Vehicle Tax due to the

home State pay too the reciprocating State a tax of

₹5,000/- for Karnataka and ₹3,000/- for Tamil Nadu per

vehicle per annum which shall be remitted into the account

of State Transport Authority of the respective State through

mutually agreed upon collection and credit arrangements.

8. No refund of tax shall be payable in respect of

vehicles replaced by another vehicle during the year for

which tax is already paid. Countersigned permit shall be

valid only for the period for which the tax is paid under this

agreement and the same stand automatically cancelled, if

tax is not paid. Countersigned permit shall be granted for

plying the vehicles on all motorable roads subject to local

rules or restrictions imposed by the counter State.

9. As per the revised/modified supplementary

agreement with State of Karnataka (S.R.O. No.659/2016),

the number of single point tax/extension of validity permits

were enhanced and limited to 5,000 for vehicles registered

in both Kerala and Karnataka and with the supplementary

agreement with State of Tamil Nadu (S.R.O. No. 648/2008)

the number of single point tax/extension of validity permits

were enhanced and limited to 5,000 for vehicles registered

in both Kerala and Tamil Nadu.

10. Ext.P1 letter was issued to the Secretary, State

Transport Authority, Karnataka was upon the request of

Sri. Jomon K.M. in which he has requested the State

Transport Authority, Kerala to issue a recommendation

letter to State Transport Authority, Karnataka for issuing

E.V. of permit on single point tax basis as per Ext.P1. The

recommendation letter will be issued only when there

exists vacancy. The purpose of recommendation letter of

Home State to the other State is to ensure that the permit

so recommended is well within the number of permits

reciprocally agreed between the States. Hence, the

recommendation from the Home State to the other State is

a condition precedent without which the other State could

not ascertain the limit so fixed for single point taxation E.V.

Permits.

11. The Goods Carriages Permit holders plying their

vehicles in the reciprocating State with valid

countersignature shall in addition to the Vehicle Tax due to

the Home State pay to the reciprocating State, a tax of

₹5,000/- per vehicle per annum which shall be remitted

into the account of State Transport Authority of the

respective State through mutually agreed upon collection

and credit arrangements.

12. Subject to the conditions of the reciprocal

agreement, the total number of goods vehicles for

operation on the Interstate route between the State of

Kerala and Karnataka on single point tax shall be fixed at

10,000 numbers and number of such permits issued in

each State shall not exceed 5,000 numbers. The quota of

such Goods Vehicle Permits of each State to be counter

signed by the other State in accordance with the proviso to

sub-Section (4) of Section 88 of the Motor Vehicles Act,

1988 (Central Act 59 of 1988) shall be 5,000.

13. The counsel for the petitioner would urge that

the reasons advanced in the statement filed by the

respondents are not sustainable.

14. Heard.

15. The contention of the petitioner's Association is

that if the suggestions made by the petitioner are

accepted, that will be convenient not only to the operators

but also to the officials.

16. Considering the facts of the case, I am of the

view that the 1st respondent can consider Ext.P2

representation submitted by the petitioner at the first

instance atleast.

The writ petition is therefore disposed of

directing the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P2

representation submitted by the petitioner and pass

appropriate orders within a period of two months. It is

made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on

merit of the claims made by the petitioner.

Sd/-

N. NAGARESH JUDGE SR

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 1960/2024

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF ONE OF SUCH LETTER DIRECTING THE APPLICANT AND APPROACH THE SECRETARY STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY KARNATAKA DATED 06.10.2023.

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 03.01.2024.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter