Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 12542 Ker
Judgement Date : 22 November, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA, 1945
RP NO. 1166 OF 2023
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT WP(C) 20170/2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3:
1 UNIVERSITY OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, SENATE HOUSE CAMPUS,
PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695034
2 THE SYNDICATE
UNIVERSITY OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE CHANCELLOR,
SENATE HOUSE CAMPUS, PALAYAM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695034
3 THE REGISTRAR
UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, SENATE HOUSE CAMPUS, PALAYAM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695034
BY ADV THOMAS ABRAHAM
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS 4 TO 6:
1 D S SANTHOSHKUMAR
S/O N DEVAPALAN NAIR, AGED 49 YEARS, DEPUTY REGISTRAR,
CREDIT AND SEMESTER SYSTEM, KARYAVATTOM, UNIVERSITY OF
KERALA RESIDING AT MIDHILA, TC 18/691-1, PUNNAKKAMUGAL,
ARAMADA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695032
2 B H JAYASREE
DEPUTY REGISTRAR (I), UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, SENATE HOUSE
CAMPUS, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695034
3 S UMADEVI
DEPUTY REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, SENATE HOUSE CAMPUS,
PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695034
4 SINDHU GEORGE
DEPUTY REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, SENATE HOUSE CAMPUS,
PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695034
SRI. LIJU V. STEPHEN
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.11.2023,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RP No.1166 of 2023
in W.P.(C.) No.20170 of 2023
2
T.R. RAVI, J.
------------------------------------
R.P. No.1166 of 2023
in W.P.(C.) No.20170 of 2023
------------------------------------
Dated this the 22nd day of November, 2023
ORDER
The review petition has been filed for a
clarification that the judgment will not affect the
continuance of the disciplinary action which had
already been initiated. This Court has not
considered the correctness or otherwise of the
disciplinary action that is pending. As a matter
of fact, the only aspect considered was whether
the promotion can be denied anticipating a
disciplinary action.
2. It is hence clarified that the judgment
will not in any manner affect the continuance of
the disciplinary action and taking it to the logical
end.
The review petition is closed.
Sd/-
T.R.RAVI JUDGE SKP/22-11
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE A1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF INQUIRY DATED NIL ANNEXURE A2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE MEMO NO.AD.A.I/3/2023 DATED 17/4/2023 ISSUED TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT ANNEXURE A3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE HANDWRITTEN STATEMENT SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT BEFORE THE SUB COMMITTEE OF THE SYNDICATE AT THE HEARING CONDUCTED ON 23/5/2023 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:NIL
TRUE COPY
P.A. TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!