Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt C M Hema vs K Sathisha
2022 Latest Caselaw 11104 Kant

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11104 Kant
Judgement Date : 25 July, 2022

Karnataka High Court
Smt C M Hema vs K Sathisha on 25 July, 2022
Bench: K.S.Mudagal, S Rachaiah
                                     M.F.A. No.7451/2013

                              1

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

         DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JULY 2022

                       :PRESENT:

        THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL

                             AND

           THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH

 MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.7451/2013 (MC)
BETWEEN:

SMT.C.M.HEMA
W/O K.SATISHA
AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS
R/AT NEAR VARTHAKARA BHAVANA
GANDHINAGARA
CHIKMAGALUR CITY - 577 101
PRESENTLY R/AT
C/O VISHWANATH
VIT CROSS, OPP:EMVEE SOLAR FACTORY
BESIDES KADAMBARI FARM
YELAHANKA, JALA HOBLI
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK
BANGALORE - 560 064                      ...APPELLANT
(BY SMT.C.M.HEMA [ABSENT])

AND:

K.SATHISHA
S/O KRISHNE GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
WORKING AT CABLE NET WORK
R/AT HOSAMANE EXTENSION
CHIKMAGALUR - 577 101
PRESENTLY R/AT
SHYLAJA NETWORK
AGRAHARA CIRCLE, KOTE
CHIKKAMAGALUR - 577 101                   ...RESPONDENT
                                          M.F.A. No.7451/2013

                             2

     THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 28 OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 PRAYING TO
SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.09.2012
PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,
CHIKMAGALUR IN M.C.NO.116/2011 ALLOWING THE PETITION
FILED UNDER SECTION 13(1) OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955
FOR DECREE OF DIVORCE.

     THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR
ORDERS THIS    DAY, K.S.MUDAGAL J., DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:

                        JUDGMENT

Learned Counsel for the appellant has submitted memo

of retirement after issuing notice to the appellant. The said

notice is returned with endorsement that there is 'no such

person in the given address'. Therefore considering his

submission, learned Counsel for the appellant is permitted to

retire.

2. It appears that the appellant is not interested in

prosecuting the matter. Therefore the appeal is dismissed for

non-prosecution.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE KSR

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter