Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6787 Jhar
Judgement Date : 11 November, 2025
2025:JHHC:33564-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No. 5897 of 2025
Banshidhar Construction Pvt. Ltd., having its office at 2nd Floor, Near
Biscuit Factory More, Nasriganj, PO-Digha, PS-Danapur, District-
Patna, through its Chief Executive Officer, Kanchan Yadav
... ... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand, through the Secretary, Department of
Mines and Geology, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi
2. The Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Government
of Jharkhand, Ranchi
3. The Director, Department of Mines and Geology, Jharkhand,
Ranchi
4. The Deputy Commissioner, Chatra
5. Jharkhand State Mineral Development Corporation, through the
Secretary, Ranchi
6. The In-charge Sand-I, Jharkhand State Mineral Development
Corporation, Ranchi ... ... Respondents
-----
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
-----
For the Petitioner : Mr. D.K. Pathak, Advocate
For the Respondents : Mr. Piyush Chitresh, AC to AG
-----
02/11.11.2025 The Instant writ petition has been filed for quashing
letter no. 1058 dated 01.08.2025 (Annexure-10 to the writ petition)
issued by the respondent no. 6, whereby (a) Letter of Intent no.
413 dated 21.02.2024 and agreement dated 04.03.2024, (b) Letter
of Intent no. 414 dated 21.02.2024 and the agreement dated
04.03.2024, and (c) Letter of Intent no. 415 dated 21.02.2024 and
agreement 04.03.2024 pertaining to (i) Urali & Bahera sand
deposit, (ii) Kedalikalan, Patwa, Banki and Kobni sand deposits and
(iii) Sahi sand deposit in the district of Chatra respectively have
been cancelled with effect from 16.08.2025 and the petitioner has
been directed to provide bank account details for refund of
performance and additional security. Further prayer has been made
for issuance of direction upon the concerned respondents to
2025:JHHC:33564-DB
conduct public hearing with respect to the aforesaid sand deposits
in the district of Chatra as, according to the petitioner, the aforesaid
letters and agreements are highly arbitrary and not in accordance
with law.
2. It is jointly submitted by learned counsel for the parties
that the issue in question is no longer res-integra in view of the
judgment rendered by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in batch of
writ petitions led by W.P.(C) No. 4503 of 2025, whereby all the writ
petitions have been ordered to be dismissed.
3. For the reasons stated in the aforesaid judgment which
shall be read mutatis-mutandis to the facts of the instant petition,
the same is accordingly dismissed, leaving the parties to bear their
own costs.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan, C.J.)
(Rajesh Shankar, J.) November 11, 2025 Manish/Ritesh
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!