Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manohar Paswan vs The State Of Jharkhand
2022 Latest Caselaw 2812 Jhar

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2812 Jhar
Judgement Date : 21 July, 2022

Jharkhand High Court
Manohar Paswan vs The State Of Jharkhand on 21 July, 2022
                                          1

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
                       Cr.M.P. No. 1224 of 2022
                                         ----

Manohar Paswan, aged about 45 years, son of Bhim Ram, resident of Village Rupaitha, PO and PS-Nokha, District Rohtas (Sasaram), Bihar ..... Petitioner

-- Versus --

1.The State of Jharkhand

2.Asha, aged about 33 years daughter of late Ramdeo Ram, permanent address villge Dharampur, PO Kailo Dehri (Andhari) Block Sadar, PS Dehri, District Bhojpur, Ara, Bihar, presently residing at Hatma, Kanke Road (renter in the house of Vijay Kumar), PO and PS Gonda District Ranchi ...... Opposite Parties

----

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

---

For the Petitioner :- Mr. Surendra Pratap Singh, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, Advocate

----

4/21.07.2022 This petition has been filed for quashing the order taking

cognizance dated 11.12.2020 and the order of charge framed dated

16.03.2022 arising out of Gonda P.S.Case No.63 of 2020, G.R.No.3665 of

2020 [Sessions Trial No.21 of 2022], pending in the court of A.J.C.1 st cum

Special Judge, FTC (CAW), Ranchi.

The case was instituted against the petitioner on the basis of written information submitted by the informant Asha alleging therein that I, Asha doing work of nursing and it is further alleging therein that on 23.03.2020 a call had come from Mobile No.9631176947, 8651138675 and 787065348 on my Mobile 7050224410 and 9905802434. He talked to me and disclosed his name as Manohar Paswan son of Bhim Ram, resident of Village Rupaitha, Block Nokha District Rohtas, Sasaram, Bihar. Manohar Paswan further told that I am unmarried and doing job in Aurangaad Collectoriate in Bihar. Informant told that he further told that I am willing to merry with you. Then informant told that I am already married and having children. Then he told that he has no objection and am in knowledge that you have been neglected by your husband. It is further stated by the informant that she stopped to talk on by cutting call. But he used to contact me by way of facebook, whatsapp and messages and always used to disturb. I want to overlook, but suddenly he came to my residence on 26.05.2020 and established physical relationship with me on promise to marriage. But he did not marry with me. It is further stated by the informant that she become mentally ill and lodging a FIR against Manohar Paswan son of Bhim Ram with a request to

take necessary legal action against him.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

entire criminal proceeding is fit to be quashed on the ground that FIR

was lodged after 3 months of the alleged occurrence and there is no eye

witness and no case is made out against the petitioner. He further

submits that the charge has also been framed which is under challenge

in this petition.

The learned counsel for the respondent State submits that

there is no illegality and the court has rightly taken the cognizance and

framed charge.

It is well known that cases under section 376 IPC merely on

the ground of delay it would not be thrown away the proceeding as has

been held in several judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court as well as the

High Courts. There are allegations of calling upon the informant and

establishing relationship fraudulently even if the relationship has been

established on the false marriage that is also required to be proved in the

trial. What are the materials in the charge sheet that has not been before

this Court and this Court is not in a position to appreciate the materials

brought on record of trial court by the investigating agency. The learned

court has applied its mind in taking cognizance and has taken cognizance

after looking into the materials available in the FIR, charge sheet and

other documents and the order framing charge is a speaking order for

framing of charge and the only requirement is to explain the charge

properly and in clear term that has been done by the learned court.

There is no illegality in the order framing charge.

Cr.M.P.No.1224 of 2022 is accordingly dismissed.

I.A. if any also stands disposed of.

( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)

SI/,

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter