Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nikunj Vallabhbhai Mandaviya vs State Of Gujarat
2024 Latest Caselaw 636 Guj

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 636 Guj
Judgement Date : 24 January, 2024

Gujarat High Court

Nikunj Vallabhbhai Mandaviya vs State Of Gujarat on 24 January, 2024

                                                                                         NEUTRAL CITATION




     R/CR.RA/114/2024                                     ORDER DATED: 24/01/2024

                                                                                          undefined




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

     R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (AGAINST CONVICTION -
          NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT) NO. 114 of 2024

==========================================================
                         NIKUNJ VALLABHBHAI MANDAVIYA
                                     Versus
                               STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR RATHIN P RAVAL(5013) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MS JIRGA JHAVERI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE S.V. PINTO

                                 Date : 24/01/2024

                                  ORAL ORDER

1. Ms. Esha S. Bhavsar, learned advocate submits that she has instruction to appear for the respondent No. 2 - original complainant, and therefore, she may be permitted to file his appearance. Accordingly, she is permitted to file his appearance.

2. With consent of the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing as the matter is amicably settled between the parties and the offence is bailable and compoundable and nothing survives in the matter.

3. Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned advocates appearing for the respondents waive service of notice of Rule on behalf of respective parties.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.RA/114/2024 ORDER DATED: 24/01/2024

undefined

4. By way of the present revision application filed under Section 397 read with 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the applicant has prayed for quashing and setting aside the judgment and order dated 10/11/2023 passed by the learned 10th Additional District and Sessions Judge, Rajkot in Criminal Appeal No.273 of 2022 as well as order dated 28/04/2022 passed by the learned 11 th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajkot in Criminal Case No.13637 of 2019.

4.1. Vide impugned order dated 28/04/2022 passed in Criminal Case No.13637 of 2019, the learned 11 th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajkot was pleased to convict the applicant accused and sentenced to undergo six months simple imprisonment for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and has also ordered the applicant accused to pay compensation of Rs.2,10,000/- to the original complainant within a period of three months from the date of the order and in default of payment of compensation, to undergo further simple imprisonment for six months.

4.2. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the aforesaid order of the learned Magistrate Court, the present applicant accused filed Criminal Appeal No.273 of 2022 before the learned 10th Additional District and Sessions Court, Rajkot and the learned Sessions Court, Rajkot vide order dated 10/11/2023, confirmed the judgment and order passed by learned Magistrate Court, Rajkot and rejected the appeal of

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.RA/114/2024 ORDER DATED: 24/01/2024

undefined

the present applicant.

5. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that at present the applicant accused is in Central Jail, Rajkot since 29/11/2023. Learned advocate for the applicant further submits that the respondent original complainant has filed an affidavit of compromise stating that no grievance is pending between them and the original complainant has received the amount of compensation and hence, the present application may be allowed and the order of conviction and sentence imposed by the learned Magistrate Court which has been confirmed by the learned Sessions Court may be quashed and set aside.

6. Learned advocate appearing for the respondent original complainant submits original complainant is present before this Court and has filed an affidavit which is produced on record at Annexure-C to this application. Learned advocate for the respondent original complainant also submits that the matter is amicably settled between the parties and the original complainant has no objection if present application is allowed and the conviction recorded by the learned Trial Court as well as the learned Appellate Court is quashed and set aside.

7. Considering the fact that as under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, the offence is compoundable and permissible to settle the dispute at any stage and therefore, permission to settle the dispute is required to be allowed. It is

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.RA/114/2024 ORDER DATED: 24/01/2024

undefined

pertinent to note that the applicant has settled the dispute at the level of High Court after the confirmation by the appellate Court and therefore, the present application requires consideration.

8. The learned advocates for the respective parties have jointly submitted that the matter is settled between the parties and the original complainant does not want to pursue further litigation. The original complainant has filed the affidavit and has admitted the contents of the affidavit. Learned advocate for the complainant has stated that the original complainant has no objection if the present application is allowed and the conviction recorded by the learned Trial Court as well as the learned Appellate Court is set aside.

9. This Court has also considered the facts and circumstances arising out of the present application as also the decision passed in case of Damodar S. Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal H, reported in 2010(5) SCC 663. It appears that further continuation of criminal proceedings in relation to the impugned proceeding against the applicant would be unnecessary harassment to the applicant.

10. Considering the nature of dispute between the parties which is private in nature, the matter requires consideration and it appears that the trial would be futile and further continuance of the proceedings would amount to abuse of process of law and hence, to secure the ends of justice, the

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.RA/114/2024 ORDER DATED: 24/01/2024

undefined

order is required to be quashed and set aside in exercise of powers conferred upon this Court.

11. Resultantly, present application is allowed. The impugned judgment and order dated 10/11/2023 passed by the learned 10th Additional District and Sessions Judge, Rajkot in Criminal Appeal No.273 of 2022 as well as the judgment and order dated 28/04/2022 passed by the learned 11 th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajkot in Criminal Case No.13637 of 2019 are hereby quashed and set aside and the applicant the applicant shall be released forthwith, if his presence is no longer required in any other criminal offence subject to the applicant deposits 15% of the amount of cheque before the Gujarat High Court Legal Services Committee within a period of three weeks from the date of his release.

12. Rule is made absolute. Direct service is permitted.

(S. V. PINTO,J) ILA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter