Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6385 Guj
Judgement Date : 1 September, 2023
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/19475/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 01/09/2023
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 19475 of 2022
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA
==========================================================
1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
to see the judgment ?
2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ?
3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy
of the judgment ?
4 Whether this case involves a substantial question
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India or any order made thereunder ?
==========================================================
PLANET AUTOMOTIVE PVT. LTD.
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
UCHIT N SHETH(7336) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1,2
for the Respondent(s) No. 1
GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA
Date : 01/09/2023
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA)
1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Uchit Sheth for
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/19475/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 01/09/2023
undefined
the petitioners and learned Assistant
Government Pleader Ms. Shrunal Shah for
the respondent.
2. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned AGP
Ms. Shah waives service of notice of rule.
3. Having regard to the controversy narrated
in narrow compass, with the consent of the
learned advocates of both the sides, the
matter is taken-up for hearing.
4. By this petition under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, the petitioner has
prayed for the following reliefs:
"A. This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order quashing and setting aside impugned letter dated 20.7.2022 (Annexed at Annexure A)and the Respondents may please be directed to grant benefit
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/19475/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 01/09/2023
undefined
of Vera Samadhan Yojana-2019.
B. This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order quashing and setting aside impugned garnishee notice dated 09.09.2022 (Annexed At Annexure B);
C. This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order quashing and setting aside the demand notice for the year 2017-18 (annexed at Annexure H);
D. Pending notice admission and final hearing of this petition, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to stay the operation, execution and implementation of the impugned garnishee notice dated 9.9.2022 (annexued at Annexure B) and the petitioners may please be permitted to operate their bank account;
E. Ex parte ad interim relief in terms of prayer D may kindly be granted;
F. Such further relief(s) as deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be granted in the interest of justice for which act of
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/19475/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 01/09/2023
undefined
kindness your petitioners shall forever pray."
5. Facts in nutshell are as under:
The petitioner is a Private Limited
Company and distributor of Hyundai Car.
The petitioner No.1 is registered under
the VAT Act as well as Central Sales Tax
Act now under the Goods and Service Tax
Act ['GST Act' for short].
5.1 For the period from 01.06.2017 to
30.06.2017, the petitioner paid the total
tax of Rs. 32,20,901/- under the Entry Tax
Act. It is the case of the petitioner that
after filing of the return, it was noticed
that there was an error in tax computation
which has resulted into short payment of
tax.
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/19475/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 01/09/2023
undefined
5.2 Respondent No.1-State of Gujarat
announced an amnesty Scheme named as "Vera
Samadhan Yojana-2019" for settlement of
the disputes under different tax laws
including the Entry Tax Act. The said
Scheme was substituted by resolution dated
06.12.2019.
5.3 As per the amended Scheme, on
payment of principal tax amount, waiver of
interest and penalty was admissible. The
petitioner was accordingly entitled to
credit of tax already paid prior to the
Scheme. The said Scheme was extended from
time-to-time and ultimately, expired on
31.08.2021.
5.4 The petitioner availed the benefit
of the Scheme and filed an application for
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/19475/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 01/09/2023
undefined
the period from 01.06.2017 to 30.06.2017
stating that the total tax liability for
the month was Rs. 1,80,75,735/- and the
petitioner paid amount of Rs. 32,20,901/-
towards tax. The petitioner has also
submitted the challans showing the payment
of tax.
5.5 Upon filing of the application
under the said Scheme, the petitioner
received an online intimation regarding
the amount payable by the petitioner to
avail the benefit of the Scheme.
5.6 The petitioner, on receipt of such
intimation, noticed that there was error
in the intimation requiring the petitioner
to pay the amount in excess of what is
actually to be paid by the petitioner. The
petitioner therefore approached respondent
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/19475/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 01/09/2023
undefined
No.3-the Jurisdictional Officer and
pointed out an error in the letter. The
Officer corrected the amount mentioned in
the letter manually and the amount was
reduced to Rs. 1,48,54,834/- from Rs.
1,80,75,735/-.
5.7 The petitioner therefore, paid the
said amount in installments from
13.03.2020 onwards till 31.01.2021.
5.8 During the pendency of the amnesty
scheme, the petitioner No.1 was also
assessed to tax and the liability under
the Entry Tax Act and VAT Act was
determined after giving the credit of tax
already paid by the petitioner in the
assessment order.
5.9 The fact that the petitioner
applied for the amnesty scheme was also
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/19475/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 01/09/2023
undefined
recorded in the assessment order.
Considering the assessment order as a
base, the petitioner paid further amount
of Rs. 1,31,641/- as determined by the
assessment order after the set off of the
amount already paid by the petitioner
under the amnesty scheme. Thus, according
to the petitioner, the petitioner has paid
the dues as determined by the assessment
order passed on 31.12.2020 for the period
from 01.04.2017 to 30.06.2017.
5.10 However, the respondent No.3, by
impugned letter dated 20.07.2022, rejected
the application of the petitioner under
the 'Vera Samadhan Yojana-2019' on the
ground that the petitioner did not pay
full payment against the outstanding
amount intimated to the petitioner vide
intimation letter generated online.
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/19475/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 01/09/2023
undefined
Being aggrieved, the petitioner has filed
this petition.
6. Learned advocate Mr. Sheth for the
petitioner submitted that the petitioner
has paid the entire outstanding amount as
corrected by the respondent No.3 on the
intimation letter on being pointed out the
error in the said letter within the
stipulated time before 31.08.2021. It was
also submitted that the petitioner
deposited further sum of Rs. 1,31,641/-
which was left outstanding as per the
assessment order passed on 31.12.2020. It
was therefore, pointed out that the
petitioner has discharged the entire
liability within the stipulated time to
avail the benefit of the Vera Samadhan
Yojana-2019 and hence, the petitioner is
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/19475/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 01/09/2023
undefined
entitled to get the waiver of interest and
penalty leviable upon the petitioner for
short payment of the entry tax as per the
Scheme.
7. On the other hand, learned AGP Ms. Shah
for the respondent submitted that the
respondent No.3 had no authority to
correct the intimation letter by reducing
the amount of payment from Rs.
1,80,75,735/- to Rs.1,48,54,834/-. The
petitioner was liable to pay Rs.
1,80,75,735/- but the petitioner has not
made the payment as per the intimation
letter and therefore by the impugned
communication dated 20.07.2022, the
respondent has rightly disposed of the
application made by the petitioner under
the Vera Samadhan Yojna-2019.
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/19475/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 01/09/2023
undefined
8. It was further submitted that the amount
paid by the petitioner is admittedly not
as per the intimation letter. Reliance was
placed on the relevant clauses of the
amnesty scheme which is produced by the
petitioner at page 28 of the paper book to
submit that the petitioner was required to
pay 10% of the amount on or before
31.07.2020 and the remaining amount with
interest @ 1.5% per annum before
31.08.2021. It was submitted that the
petitioner had admittedly not paid the
amount of Rs. 1,80,75,735/- as per the
intimation letter generated online and
accordingly the petitioner is not entitled
to the benefit of the Vera Samadhan Yojna-
2019.
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/19475/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 01/09/2023
undefined
9. Having heard learned advocates for the
respective parties hand considering the
material on record it is not in dispute
that the petitioner has paid the entire
amount of the outstanding dues as per the
corrected intimation and assessment order
prior to the date prescribed under the
Vera Samadhan Yojna-2019 i.e. 31.08.2021.
The petitioner has paid the following
amount on various dates amounting to Rs.
1,48,54,833/-.
Planet Automotive Pvt Ltd Entry Tax Month Paid Date Installment Paid Amount March'20 13/03/2020 1485483 1510674 April'20 31/07/2020 1215396 1266712 May'20 09-01-2020 1215396 1264149 June'20 28/09/2020 1215396 1240658 July'20 13/10/2020 1215396 1248776 Aug'20 11-10-2020 1215396 1273644 Sept'20 12-08-2020 1215396 1230201 Oct'20 01-02-2021 1215396 1282539 Nov'20 20/01/2021 1215396 1236028 Dec'20 30/01/2021 1215396 1250213 Jan'21 30/01/2021 1215396 1257389
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/19475/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 01/09/2023
undefined
Feb'21 31/01/2021 1215396 793850 14854839 14854833
10. The petitioner has also deposited
Rs. 1,31,643/- on 5th March,2021 after the
assessment order was passed on 31.12.2020.
Thus, the petitioner has deposited the
entire amount as per the assessment order.
Merely because, the intimation generated
online has erroneously stated the amount
which was not correct, the petitioner was
not liable to make the payment of such
amount to avail the benefit of the Scheme
when it emerges from the record that there
was no outstanding dues towards the
principal amount of entry tax payable by
the petitioner and such amount was paid by
the petitioner before the due date i.e.
31.08.2021 as per the Scheme. In such
circumstances, the petitioner is entitled
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/19475/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 01/09/2023
undefined
to the benefit of the Vera Samadhan
Yojana- 2019 and merely because the
respondent No.3 has changed the figure of
payment to be made by the petitioner in
the intimation as the figure shown in the
in the intimation was erroneous, cannot
come in way of the petitioner in the facts
of the case to deny the benefit of the
Vera Samadhan Yojna-2019 Scheme which is a
benevolent scheme for the assessees
floated by the State of Gujarat so as to
see that the principal amount of tax is
recovered on waiver of interest and
penalty, if any, so as to reduce the
future litigation.
11. In view of the the foregoing reasons,
the petition succeeds and is accordingly
allowed. The impugned communication dated
20.07.2022 is hereby quashed and set
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/19475/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 01/09/2023
undefined
aside. Respondents are directed to give
benefit of Vera Samadhan Yojana-2019 to
the petitioner and pass consequential
order within a period of eight weeks from
the date of receipt of copy of this order.
Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid
extent. No order as to costs.
(BIREN VAISHNAV, J)
(BHARGAV D. KARIA, J) JYOTI V. JANI
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!