Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4555 Gua
Judgement Date : 8 November, 2023
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010237152023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : RSA/197/2023
AMAL DEY
S/O LATE HARI MOHAN DEY
RESIDENT OF ASHOK NAGAR, MAKUM PO AND PS MAKU, DIST
TINSUKIA, ASSAM
VERSUS
MANGAL MAJHI AND 7 ORS
S/O LATE SITA RAM MEJHI
RESIDENT OF TINGRAI GAON, PO AND PS MAKUM, DIST TINSUKIA,
ASSAM
2:SRI LALBABU MAJHI
S/O LATE SITA RAM MEJHI
RESIDENT OF TINGRAI GAON
PO AND PS MAKUM
DIST TINSUKIA
ASSAM
3:SRI FAGU MAJHI
S/O LATE SITA RAM MEJHI
RESIDENT OF TINGRAI GAON
PO AND PS MAKUM
DIST TINSUKIA
ASSAM
4:SRI BIRSA MAJHI
S/O LATE SITA RAM MEJHI
RESIDENT OF TINGRAI GAON
PO AND PS MAKUM
DIST TINSUKIA
ASSAM
5:SRI JEEBAN MAJHI
Page No.# 2/3
S/O LATE SITA RAM MEJHI
RESIDENT OF TINGRAI GAON
PO AND PS MAKUM
DIST TINSUKIA
ASSAM
6:SMTI BIRASH MUNI MAJHI
D/O LATE SITA RAM MEJHI
RESIDENT OF TINGRAI GAON
PO AND PS MAKUM
DIST TINSUKIA
ASSAM
7:SMTI MINA MAJHI
W/O BALAK BUDHUA
RESIDENT OF LANGKASHI
PS BORDUBI
DIST TINSUKIA
ASSAM
8:SMTI MINU MAJHI
W/O SRI KARIMON RAOTIA
D/O LATE SITARAM MAJHI
RESIDENT OF BALIJAN
PS DULIAJAN
DIST DIBRUGARH ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR G N SAHEWALLA
Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
ORDER
08-11-2023 Heard the learned Senior Counsel Mr. G.N. Sahewalla assisted by Ms. S. Todi, the learned counsel for the appellant.
The Regular Second Appeal is admitted for hearing upon the following three substantial questions of law:
Page No.# 3/3
1. Whether the Learned Courts below erred in law in not taking into consideration the fact that Samboti Majhi who was in exclusive possession of land as Annual Patta holder got the final settlement and Periodic Patta was issued, the question of coming of other legal heirs of Late Budhu Majhi does not arise at all.
2. Whether the judgment of Learned Courts below are perverse in not considering the evidence of DW2 i.e. Lat Mandal who supports the conversion of land in the name of Samboti Majhi as well as the evidence of DW2 who admitted that no suit was filed for cancellation of the name of revenue records or conversion of Annual Patta to Periodic Patta in her name inasmuch as DW1 was a resident of Tingrai Gaon since childhood.
3. Whether the Learned Courts committed error in considering the payment of revenue for Annual Patta No. 6 even after the same being converted to Periodic Patta.
Issue notice to the respondents.
The appellant shall take steps for service of notice upon the respondents by registered post with A/D.
Call for the LCR.
List this matter after 4 (four) weeks.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!