Friday, 10, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anurag Tiwari @ Lavkush vs State Of Chhattisgarh
2026 Latest Caselaw 195 Chatt

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 195 Chatt
Judgement Date : 9 March, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Chattisgarh High Court

Anurag Tiwari @ Lavkush vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 9 March, 2026

                                                                      1




                                                                                                  NAFR
             Digitally signed
INDRAJEET by INDRAJEET
          SAHU
                                      HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SAHU      Date: 2026.03.09
             18:48:30 +0530

                                                         MCRC No. 2045 of 2026

                    1 - Anurag Tiwari @ Lavkush S/o Santosh Tiwari Aged About 20 Years R/o
                    Pure Gurudatt Tiwari Ka Purva, Post- Parabazar, Police Station- Baldirai,
                    District- Sultanpur (U.P.) (Description Of Applicant Mentioned As Per Charge
                    Sheet)
                                                                                     ... Applicant
                                                         versus
                    1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through- The Station House Officer, Police Of
                    Police Station Bhatapara (City), District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.)
                                                                                  ... Respondent
                                For Applicant        :         Shri Anil Gulati, Advocate.
                                For Respondent       :         Shri Ghanshyam Kashyap, Dy. Govt. Advocate
                                                               along with Shri Vikhyat Arora, Panel Lawyer.


                                       Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J
                                                               Order on Board
          09.03.2026

1. This is first bail application seeking grant of bail to the Applicant who is

in jail since 08.05.2025 in connection with Crime No.288/2025

registered at Police Station Bhatapara (City), District Baloda Bazar

Bhatapara for the offence punishable under Sections

318(4),319(2),336(2),336(3),338,340(2),238,111 of BNS and Section

42(2) Telecommunication Act and Section 66(C) and 66(D) of the

Information Technology Act.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 05-05-2025, the police of Police

Station Bhatapara (City) received a secret information that a person is

engaged in playing online gambling through his mobile phone near

State Bank of India and betting in the IPL Cricket Match. The police

conducted a raid and caught the co-accused Gourav Hablani, who was

actively involved in online gambling. He was interrogated and he

disclosed that he used Allpanelexch.app, the goexch09.com platform

for betting in the IPC 20-20-Cricket match through his mobile No.

7224090781 and obtained online login password of Mc123456 and ID

KLSGOI. He also disclosed that his brother Kapil Hablani, mobile No.

8421478285 and his friend Deepak Sablani, mobile No 7723008660,

have also engaged in online gambling for a long time and residing at

Vasco (South Goa) and using the betting platform of RBC139,

Kheloyaar 164, Win Bu. The online betting platform Allpanelexch.app

and goexch09.com were also provided to Gourav Hablani by Kapil

Hablani and Deepak Sablani. From memorandum statement of these

accused persons, the name of other accused persons were disclosed

who were also actively involved in the online gambling. From the

memorandum statement of Aman Dewangan, the name of present

applciant were disclosed that he too was involved in online gambling

along with other accused persons. The present applicant was arrested

on 08.05.2025 and one mobile phone was seized from him.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that except

memorandum statement of Aman Dewangan, there is no other

evidence in the charge sheet against the present applicant that he was

also involved in online gambling with other co-accused. Except mobile

phone, no other articles were seized from him to implicate him in the

offence in question. Even the name of Aman Dewangan was disclosed

in the memorandum statement of other accused persons therefore

there is no direct evidence against the present applicant. He would also

submit that other two accused persons Gaurav Hablani and Deepak

Sablani have been granted bail by the Hon'ble Supreme Court vide

order dated 09.02.2026 passed in SLP (Crl.) No. 20121/2025 and order

dated 28.01.2026 passed in Criminal Appeal No.478 of 2026. The

allegation against the present applicant is also similar to the allegations

against those co-accused, therefore, the present applicant may also be

released on bail.

4. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the State opposes

the submission made by learned counsel for the applicant and submit

that there are sufficient evidence against the applicant that he with the

association of other co-accused persons engaged in playing online

gambling. From the statement of witnesses Sameer Chouhan and

Durgesh Gujratia, the association of accused persons and their

syndicate have been disclosed. From the memorandum statement of

the Aman Dewangan, the name of present applicant has been

disclosed. In the memorandum statement of present applicant also the

entire syndicate and the manner in which they engaged in online

gambling have been disclosed. During investigation the entire network

and manner in which they organized the crime were disclosed. Looking

to the seriousness of the offence and the second bail application of the

co-accused Aman Dewangan has already been rejected by this court

vide order dated 16.02.2026, the applicant is not entitled for bail.

5. I have heard the counsel for the parties and perused the material

annexed with the application and case diary.

6. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties,

considering the nature of allegation and the material collected during

investigation, further the evidence with respect to their syndicate which

spread throughout the country and active involvement of the applicant

and further that second bail application of the co-accused Aman

Dewangan have already been dismissed by this court on 16.02.2026 in

MCrC No.1609 of 2026, this court is not inclined to release the present

applicant on bail.

7. Accordingly, the application for grant of bail is rejected.

Sd/-

(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge

inder

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Media

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter