Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chatur Singh vs State Of Chhattisgarh
2026 Latest Caselaw 1530 Chatt

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1530 Chatt
Judgement Date : 10 April, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Chattisgarh High Court

Chatur Singh vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 10 April, 2026

                                                            1




                                                                             2026:CGHC:16606
         Digitally
         signed by
         YOGESH
YOGESH   TIWARI
TIWARI   Date:
         2026.04.10
         18:23:14
                                                                                          NAFR
         +0530



                                HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR


                                                WPC No. 2030 of 2020

                      1 - Chatur Singh S/o Late Shobhi Ram Aged About 70 Years
                      Agriculturist, R/o Village - Gidhori, Tehsil - Kartala, Post - Dadarkala,
                      Dist. Korba
                      2 - Chopda Singh, S/o Shri Chatur Singh, Aged About 40 Years
                      Agriculturist, R/o Village - Gidhori, Tehsil - Kartala, Post Dadarkala, Dist.
                      Korba
                      3 - Ramesh Kumar S/o Shri Chatur Singh Aged About 42 Years
                      Agriculturist, R/o Village - Gidhori, Tehsil - Kartala, Post Dadarkala, Dist.
                      Korba
                                                                                   ... Petitioners
                                                        versus
                      1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Animal
                      Husbandry And Dairying, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
                      2 - The Collector, Korba, Dist. Korba (Chhattisgarh)
                      3 - The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Kartala, Dist. Korba
                      (Chhattisgarh)
                      4 - The Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Gidhori, Dist. Korba (Chhattisgarh)
                                                                                 ... Respondents

(Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. B.P. Rao, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Uttam Pandey, Advocate For State/Respondents No.1 : Mr. Dilman Rati Minj, Deputy and 2 Advocate General For Respondents No.3 and 4 : Ms. Zainab Vanak, Advocate on behalf of Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate

Hon'ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 10.04.2026

1 The petitioners have filed this writ petition with the following

relief(s):-

"10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court be pleased to summon the entire record pertaining to this case from the concerned office and to decide the grievance of the Petitioner in the interest of justice.

10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court be pleased to pass an Order, directing the Respondents to immediately stop the construction of Cow Shelter

of Village Gidhori in Kartala Tehsil of Korba District, where the Petitioners are living and cultivating since past 6-7 decades.

10.3 That, the Hon'ble Court be pleased to pass another order, directing the Respondents to remove all the so far work done in respect to construction of Cow Shed/Gothan on the said

of Village Gidhori in Kartala Tehsil of Korba District.

10.4 That, any other relief if deem fit, proper and appropriate may also be passed in the interest of justice."

2 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners

and their forefathers have been in continuous, peaceful and

uninterrupted occupation of the subject land bearing Khasra No.

1140, admeasuring 8.694 hectares, situated in Village Gidhori,

P.H. No. 21, Tehsil Kartala, District Korba, for the last 6-7

decades. It is contended that although the land is recorded as

Government waste land, the same has long been under the

possession and use of the petitioners, who have been cultivating

paddy crops thereon and have also constructed residential

houses, thereby establishing settled possession over the said

land. It is further submitted that under the State Government's

scheme namely Narwa, Garuwa, Ghuruwa & Badi, particularly

under the component "Garuwa", a proposal was made to

construct Gothan/Cow Shelters in villages by utilizing excess and

undisputed land available with the Gram Panchayat. However, in

the present case, the respondent No. 3 - Sarpanch of Gram

Panchayat, without properly verifying the factual possession and

nature of the land, has erroneously identified the subject land,

which is neither vacant nor undisputed, but is in actual possession

of the petitioners.

3 Learned counsel submits that acting upon such recommendation,

the respondents have commenced construction activities over the

said land, including fencing and dumping of construction

materials, thereby interfering with the peaceful possession of the

petitioners. It is contended that such action is arbitrary, illegal and

in violation of the petitioners' rights, particularly when the land in

question is under cultivation and the standing paddy crop is likely

to be adversely affected. It is also submitted that immediately

upon gaining knowledge of the said activities, petitioner No. 1

submitted representations dated 13.08.2020 and 17.08.2020

before the competent authorities, requesting them to restrain from

proceeding with the construction of the Gothan/Cow Shelter on

the said land. However, despite such representations, no action

has been taken by the authorities and the construction work is

being continued, compelling the petitioners to approach this Court

seeking appropriate relief.

4 On the other hand, learned State counsel submits that the Gothan

Scheme, which was introduced during the tenure of the previous

Government, has now been discontinued. It is, therefore,

contended that no further construction activity is being carried out

pursuant to the said scheme and the very basis of the grievance

raised in the present petition no longer survives.

5 Considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the

petitioners, and in view of the stand taken by the State that the

scheme in question has already been discontinued, this Court is

of the opinion that the cause of action, as projected in the present

petition, does not subsist any further. Consequently, the instant

petition has been rendered infructuous.

6 Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of as having become

infructuous. However, it is made clear that if any surviving

grievance still remains, the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail

appropriate remedy in accordance with law.

Sd/-

(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter