Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 124 Chatt
Judgement Date : 24 June, 2024
Neutral Citation
2024:CGHC:21062
Page 1 of 2
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 3257 of 2024
1. Umendram Son Of Firantaram Sahu Aged About 63 Years R/o
Ward No. 15 Village Sursabandha, Tahsil - Rajim, District -
Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh.
2. Raghunandan Son Of Beniram Yadav Aged About 63 Years R/o
Navatariyapara, Ward No. 16, Lafandhi, District - Gariyaband,
Chhattisgarh.
3. Bhukhan Son Of Manku Sahu Aged About 63 Years Resident Of
Abadi Para Ward No. 4, Semhartara, Post - Kirvai, Tahsil -
Gariyaband, District - Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh.
4. Sukshyam Sahu Son Of Ramcharan Aged About 67 Years
Resident Of Village And Post - Pokhara, District - Gariyaband,
Chhattisgarh.
5. Likhanram Sahu Son Of Vaisakhu Sahu Aged About 71 Years
Resident Of Village - Partewa, District - Gariyaband,
Chhattisgarh.
6. Budhram Sahu Son Of Suklal Sahu Aged About 70 Years
Resident Of Village - Semhartara, Post - Kirvai, District -
Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh.
7. Smt. Ratni Wife Of Late Tejram Aged About 59 Years Resident
Of Village - Semhartara, Post - Kirvai, District - Gariyaband,
Chhattisgarh.
8. Smt. Sukhiya Sahu Wife Of Late Kartikram Sahu Aged About 61
Years Resident Of Bastipara, Ward No. 8, Post - Kirvai, District -
Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Water Resources
Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur,
Chhattisgarh.
2. The Executive Engineer Water Resources Division, Gariyaband,
District - Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh.
3. The Divisional Joint Director Treasury, Accounts And Pension,
Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
For Petitioner : Mr. Gaurav Singhal, Advocate For State : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Dy. Govt. Advocate Neutral Citation 2024:CGHC:21062
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 24.06.2024
1. The issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided
by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & others Vs. State of
Chhattisgarh [WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (decided on
30.09.2022)].
2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition also deserves to be
disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in
case of Faguvaram Patel (supra).
3. Accordingly, the writ petition (s) stands disposed of.
Sd/-
(Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Deshmukh
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!