Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manoj Yadav vs State Of Chhattisgarh
2022 Latest Caselaw 6896 Chatt

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6896 Chatt
Judgement Date : 17 November, 2022

Chattisgarh High Court
Manoj Yadav vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 17 November, 2022
                                                                                    Page 1 of 3

                      HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                                        Order Sheet

                                    CRA No. 1710 of 2022

    Manoj Yadav, S/o Jugla Yadav, aged about 24 years, R/o Village Patora, P.S. Lundra,
     District- Surguja (C.G.)

                                                                                ---- Appellant
                                           Versus
    State of Chhattisgarh Through: the Station House Officer, PS Lundra, District- Surguja
     (C.G.) Civil & Revenue District- Ambikapur (Surguja) Cr. No. 50/2020 PS Lundra,
     Dist.Surguja (C.G.).

                                                                              ---- Respondent

17.11.2022 Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Praveen Shrivastava, P. L. for the State/respondent.

Heard on application (I.A. No. 01 of 2022) for suspension of sentence and grant of bail to the appellant.

By the impugned Judgment dated 18.10.2022 passed by Special Judge (Atrocities), Surguja, Ambikapur, (C.G.) in Special ST(Atrocities) No. 43/2020 and Crime No. 50/2020, stands convicted and sentenced as under:

S. No. Conviction Sentences

1. Under Section 354 (A)(1) (i) of R.I. for 1 year and fine of the Indian Penal Code Rs. 500/- in default of payment of fine amount to further undergo 1 month R. I.

2. Under Section 354(A)(1)(ii) of R.I. for 1 year and fine of Indian Penal Code Rs. 500/- in default of payment of fine amount

to further undergo 1 month R.I.

3. 509 of the Indian Penal Code S.I. for 1 year and fine of Rs. 500/- in default of payment of fine amount to further undergo 1 month S. I.

4. Section 3(1)(r)(ii) of the R.I. for 1 year and fine of Scheduled Castes and Rs. 500/- in default of Scheduled Tribes(Prevention of payment of fine amount Atrocities)Act, 1989 to further undergo 1 month R. I.

5. Section 3(2)(v)(A) of the R.I. for 1 year and fine of Scheduled Castes and Rs. 500/- in default of Scheduled Tribes(Prevention of payment of fine amount Atrocities)Act, 1989. to further undergo 1 month R. I.

6. Section 3(2)(v)(A) of the S.I. for 1 year and fine of Scheduled Castes and Rs. 500/- in default of Scheduled Tribes(Prevention of payment of fine amount Atrocities)Act, 1989 to further undergo 1 month S. I.

All sentences were ordered to be run concurrently.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that during trial the appellant was remained in jail only for 5 days and he has been convicted only for one year i.e. short sentence. He lastly submits that the appeal is of the 2022 and disposal of the appeal is likely to take some time. Therefore, it is prayed that the appellant may be released on bail.

On the other hand, learned State Counsel opposes submissions of the counsel for the appellant.

In pursuance of the order dated 09.11.2022, the victim has appeared before this Court through video conferencing from the District Legal Services Authority (DLSA), Surguja and raised objection to the application for

suspension of sentence and grant of bail to the appellant.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature & gravity of allegations against appellant and particularly considering the fact that it is a short sentence and the appeal is of the 2022 and disposal of the appeal is likely to take some time, without expressing anything on merit of the case I am inclined to allow the appellant to release on bail.

Accordingly, application (IA No.1 of 2022) for suspension of sentence and grant of bail is allowed and it is directed that execution of further substantive jail sentence of the appellant shall remain suspended and he shall be released on bail on his executing a personal bond in sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of trial Court for his appearance before the Registry of this Court on 5th of January, 2023. He shall thereafter appear before Registry of this Court on a date to be given by the Registry of this Court and shall continue to appear on all such subsequent dates as are given to him by the Registry of this Court till the disposal of this appeal.

List this appeal for final hearing in due course.

Sd/-

(Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge

amita

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter