Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1544 Cal
Judgement Date : 15 March, 2024
25 15.03.
2024 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Ct CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION
237 APPELLATE SIDE
rup CRR 2210 of 2016
Srinath Mukherjee
versus
Srabani Banerjee
Mr. Probal Kr. Halder,
Mr. C. Halder,
Mr. S Halder ... for the petitioner.
1.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has
submitted that petitioner filed this revisional application
being aggrieved by the order and judgment dated 23.02.2016
passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 2 nd Court,
Serampore, Hooghly in connection with Criminal Appeal No.
02 of 2015 under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, whereby the judgment and order of conviction
dated 13.06.2007 passed by the learned Additional Chief
Judicial Magistrate, Searampore in connection with CR Case
No. 91 of 2006 was affirmed.
2. At this stage, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner has filed one order of learned Additional Chief
Judicial Magistrate passed on 05.02.2019 in connection with
CR Case No. 91 of 2006 whereby the case was disposed of on
settlement between the parties. The copy of the order be kept
with the record.
3. Accordingly, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner has submitted that the instant revisional
application has become infructuous.
4. Given facts and circumstances, the instant revisional
application stands dismissed being infructuous.
5. Connected application, if there be any, also stands dismissed.
6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
7. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly
downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!