Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3917 Cal
Judgement Date : 4 July, 2022
23.
04.07.2022.
Ct. No. 11.
F.B.
MAT 608 of 2021
with
IA No. CAN 1 of 2021
with
IA No. CAN 2 of 2021
The Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group
Insurance & Ors.
-Vs.-
Smt. Kabita Sinha & Anr.
Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Vaisya,
Mr. Suman Dey
..... For the Appellants/State.
Mr. Tarapada Das,
Mr. Chandan Dutta
.....For the Respondent/
Writ Petitioner.
Re: IA No. CAN 1 of 2021
Party/Parties is/are represented in the order of
their name/names as printed above in the cause title.
Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Vaisya, Learned Additional
Government Pleader (AGP) assisted by Mr. Suman Dey,
Learned State Counsel, appears in support of the
appeal and also in support of IA No. CAN 1 of 2021,
which is an application for condonation of delay in
preferring the appeal.
The Respondent/Writ Petitioner is represented
by Mr. Tarapada Das, Learned Counsel with Mr.
Chandan Dutta, Learned Advocate.
Heard.
Perused the contents of IA No. CAN 1 of 2021.
Cause shown is found to be sufficient.
Accordingly, the delay stands condoned. The
appeal is formally treated to be on board.
IA No. CAN 1 of 2021 stands thus disposed of.
Re: MAT 608 of 2021 with IA No. CAN 2 of 2021.
This appeal is directed against the Judgement
and Order of the Hon'ble Single Bench dated 9 th of
December, 2019 in the writ petition, being W.P. No.
7741 (W) of 2018.
On behalf of the State Appellants, Mr. Bhaskar
Prasad Vaisya, Learned Additional Government Pleader
assisted by Mr. Suman Dey, Learned State Counsel,
produces a copy of an Order dated 6th of April, 2022 in
MAT 1518 of 2019 with IA No. CAN 2 of 2019 (Old No.
CAN 10437 of 2019) in the matter of the State of West
Bengal and Others -Vs.- Sabita Roy.
From the contents of the said Order dated 6 th of
April, 2022, it transpires that a similar issue which is
germane to this appeal and connected to pension
payable to widowed/unmarried daughters of the
deceased employees has been referred to a Larger
Bench in the light of conflict of decisions on the issue
amongst several Benches of this Court.
The relevant portion of the Order dated 6 th of
April, 2022 of the concurrent Hon'ble Division Bench
reads as follows:-
"What we noticed from the above that there
are conflicting judgments of the coordinate Benches
operating in the filed. The judicial discipline demands
that the issue raised before the earlier coordinate
Benches where the contrary view has been taken to
be resolved by the Larger Bench to achieve the
certainty and the uniformity in law, which is virtue.
We, thus, feel that the point, which is required to be
answered by the Larger Bench in view of the
conflicting decision is-
"Whether the benefit of family pension
can be extended to unmarried/widowed
daughter of an employee who superannuated
or died prior to coming in force of the Death-
cum-Retirement Benefit Scheme, 1981, which
came into effect on and from 1st April 1981."
Let this matter be placed before the Hon'ble
the Chief Justice for constituting a Larger Bench to
answer the reference as indicated above."
This Court have carefully considered the
materials placed and the issues raised in this appeal.
This Court is of the view that this appeal requires to be
also placed before the Hon'ble Larger Bench for a parity
of consideration.
MAT 608 of 2021 with IA No. CAN 2 of 2021
stand accordingly released for the above reasons.
In view of the order passed above, the operation
of the order impugned stands stayed till the
order/orders are passed by the Hon'ble Larger Bench.
All parties to act in terms of the copy of the
order downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Lapita Banerji, J.) (Subrata Talukdar, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!