Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Munni Devi vs State Of U.P. And Another
2022 Latest Caselaw 5419 ALL

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5419 ALL
Judgement Date : 27 June, 2022

Allahabad High Court
Munni Devi vs State Of U.P. And Another on 27 June, 2022
Bench: Siddharth



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?
 
Court No. - 33
 

 
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4402 of 2022
 

 
Applicant :- Munni Devi
 
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Viveka Nand Rai
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ankit Kapoor
 

 
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.

The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Munni Devi, with a prayer to release her on bail in Case Crime No.502 of 2021, under Section- 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station- Bhelupur, District- Varanasi, during pendency of trial.

Prior to lodging the F.I.R., the applicant has instituted a suit for permanent injunction against the informant's side. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that after institution of the aforesaid suit, F.I.R. has been lodged alleging offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC by way of counter blast. The dispute between the parties is purely of civil nature. The applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. She has no criminal history to her credit. The applicant has definite apprehension that she may be arrested by the police any time.

Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the applicant, but could not dispute the aforesaid fact.

Hence the applicant is directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail as per the Constitution Bench judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Sushila Aggarwal vs. State (NCT of Delhi)- 2020 SCC Online SC 98 and order dated 22.05.2020 passed by this Court in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No.2609 of 2020. The future contingencies regarding anticipatory bail being granted to applicant shall also be taken care of as per the aforesaid judgment of the Apex Court.

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the nature of accusations and her antecedents, the applicant is entitled to be released on anticipatory bail in this case.

Let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court concerned with the following conditions:-

1. The applicant shall not leave India during the currency of trial without prior permission from the concerned trial Court.

2. The applicant shall surrender her passport, if any, to the concerned trial Court forthwith. Her passport will remain in custody of the concerned trial Court.

3. That the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

4. The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence and the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law to ensure presence of the applicant.

5. In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail, the trial Court concerned may take appropriate action in accordance with law and judgment of Apex Court in the case of Sushila Aggarwal vs. State (NCT of Delhi)- 2020 SCC Online SC 98.

6. The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of her bail and proceed against her in accordance with law.

7. The party shall file certified copy/computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

8. The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

Order Date :- 27.6.2022

Ruchi Agrahari

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter