Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5169 ALL
Judgement Date : 13 June, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 48 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7232 of 2022 Petitioner :- Hukam Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar,Rahul Chaudhary Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.A.
Present writ petition has been preferred for quashing the FIR dated 10.5.2022, registered as Case Crime No. 279/2022, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC, P.S. Kotwali, District Mathura and for a direction to the respondents not to arrest the petitioner in pursuance of the aforesaid FIR.
Learned AGA opposed the prayer for quashing of the FIR, which discloses cognizable offence.
Perusal of the impugned first information report prima facie reveals commission of cognizable offence. Therefore, in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Haryana and others vs. Bhajan Lal and others, 1992 Supp. (1) SCC 335; M/s Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra, AIR 2021 SC 1918 and the judgment dated 7.10.2021 in Leelavati Devi @ Leelawati & Anr. v. State of U.P., Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).3262 of 2021, no case has been made out for interference with the impugned first information report.
Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed leaving it open for the petitioner to apply before the competent court for anticipatory bail/ bail as permissible under law and in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 13.6.2022
Vandana
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!