Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 22831 ALL
Judgement Date : 23 December, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 93 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1536 of 2010 Revisionist :- Lal Husain Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- S.K. Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Surendra Singh-I,J.
List revised. None present for the revisionist. None present on behalf of opposite party nos. 2 to 5 as well. Learned A.G.A. is present on behalf of the State.
This revision has been filed against the impugned judgment and order dated 01.02.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge/FTC Court no. 3, Basti, vide which the Trial Court had acquitted the accused, Imamuddin, Mohd. Mohasin and Shaisunisha under Section 323, 336, 504, 506, 427 I.P.C.
Heard learned A.G.A. and perused the lower court record record including the impugned judgment and order dated 01.02.2010.
There is no illegality, irregularity, impropriety or jurisdictional error in the impugned judgement and order. There is no ground to allow the criminal revision.
It is dismissed, accordingly.
Let the lower court record be sent back to the Trial Court.
Order Date :- 23.12.2022
Brijesh Maurya
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!